Application of Tendon-Derived Matrix and Carbodiimide Crosslinking Matures the Engineered Tendon-Like Proteome on Meltblown Scaffolds

IF 3.1 3区生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1155/term/2184723

Thomas Lee Jenkins, Sadhana Venkataraman, Aya Saleh, Sarah Calve, Behnam Pourdeyhimi, Dianne Little

{"title":"Application of Tendon-Derived Matrix and Carbodiimide Crosslinking Matures the Engineered Tendon-Like Proteome on Meltblown Scaffolds","authors":"Thomas Lee Jenkins, Sadhana Venkataraman, Aya Saleh, Sarah Calve, Behnam Pourdeyhimi, Dianne Little","doi":"10.1155/term/2184723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n Background: Tendon injuries are increasingly common and heal by fibrosis rather than scar-less regeneration. Tissue engineering seeks to improve repair using synthetic polymer scaffolds with biomimetic factors to enhance the regenerative potential.\n Methods: In this study, we compared three groups, namely, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) meltblown scaffolds, PLA meltblown scaffolds coated with tendon-derived matrix (TDM), and PLA meltblown scaffolds with carbodiimide crosslinked TDM (2.5:1:1 EDC:NHS:COOH ratio) (EDC-TDM) and determined their potential for engineered tendon development. We cultured human adipose stem cells (hASCs) for 28 days on meltblown scaffolds (n = 4–6/group) and measured tensile mechanical function, matrix synthesis, and matrix composition using biochemical assays and proteomics.\n Results: Coating PLA meltblown scaffolds with TDM improved yield stretch and stress at 28 days compared with PLA. Matrix synthesis rates for TDM or EDC-TDM were similar to PLA. Proteomic analysis revealed that hASCs produced a collagen-rich extracellular matrix, with many tendon-related matrix proteins. Coating scaffolds with TDM led to an increase in collagen type I whereas EDC-TDM scaffolds had an increase in glycoproteins and ECM regulators compared with other groups, consistent with increased maturity of the newly deposited matrix.\n Conclusions: TDM coating and crosslinking of meltblown scaffolds demonstrated matricellular benefits for the proteome of engineered tendon development but provided fewer clear benefits toward mechanical, biochemical, and rate of matrix accumulation than expected, and that previous work with electrospun scaffolds would suggest. However, electrospun scaffolds have different fiber structure and microarchitecture than meltblown, suggesting that further consideration of these differences and refinement of TDM application methods to meltblown scaffolds is required.\n </div>","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/term/2184723","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/term/2184723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tendon injuries are increasingly common and heal by fibrosis rather than scar-less regeneration. Tissue engineering seeks to improve repair using synthetic polymer scaffolds with biomimetic factors to enhance the regenerative potential.

Methods: In this study, we compared three groups, namely, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) meltblown scaffolds, PLA meltblown scaffolds coated with tendon-derived matrix (TDM), and PLA meltblown scaffolds with carbodiimide crosslinked TDM (2.5:1:1 EDC:NHS:COOH ratio) (EDC-TDM) and determined their potential for engineered tendon development. We cultured human adipose stem cells (hASCs) for 28 days on meltblown scaffolds (n = 4–6/group) and measured tensile mechanical function, matrix synthesis, and matrix composition using biochemical assays and proteomics.

Results: Coating PLA meltblown scaffolds with TDM improved yield stretch and stress at 28 days compared with PLA. Matrix synthesis rates for TDM or EDC-TDM were similar to PLA. Proteomic analysis revealed that hASCs produced a collagen-rich extracellular matrix, with many tendon-related matrix proteins. Coating scaffolds with TDM led to an increase in collagen type I whereas EDC-TDM scaffolds had an increase in glycoproteins and ECM regulators compared with other groups, consistent with increased maturity of the newly deposited matrix.

Conclusions: TDM coating and crosslinking of meltblown scaffolds demonstrated matricellular benefits for the proteome of engineered tendon development but provided fewer clear benefits toward mechanical, biochemical, and rate of matrix accumulation than expected, and that previous work with electrospun scaffolds would suggest. However, electrospun scaffolds have different fiber structure and microarchitecture than meltblown, suggesting that further consideration of these differences and refinement of TDM application methods to meltblown scaffolds is required.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 生物-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

3.00%

发文量

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs. The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.