Effectiveness of Adding a Pain Neuroscience Education Program to a Multimodal Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients with Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.3390/brainsci15020125
Jose Angel Delgado-Gil, Eva Prado-Robles, María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz, Jesús Seco-Calvo
{"title":"Effectiveness of Adding a Pain Neuroscience Education Program to a Multimodal Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients with Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jose Angel Delgado-Gil, Eva Prado-Robles, María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz, Jesús Seco-Calvo","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15020125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program completed by patients with shoulder pain. <b>Methods</b>: A randomized, controlled trial was performed. Fifty-five patients satisfied the eligibility criteria, agreed to participate, and were randomized into an experimental group (n = 27) or control group (n = 28). A manual therapy and exercises program was administered for both groups. The experimental group also received a 4-week pain neuroscience education protocol (1 session/week, 75 min per session). The measurements taken included the active range of motion, pain, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance. The outcomes were assessed at baseline and 5 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary outcome analyzed was the group × time interaction. <b>Results</b>: The 2 × 2 analysis of variance revealed a significant group × time interaction for the active range of motion (F = 15.27; <i>p</i> = 0.011), disability (F = 6.14; <i>p</i> = 0.01), catastrophizing (F = 8.79; <i>p</i> = 0.01), kinesiophobia (F = 7.62; <i>p</i> = 0.008), and therapeutic alliance (<i>p</i> = 0.03) in favor of the experimental group. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study showed that the patients with shoulder pain who completed the pain neuroscience program achieved significantly better results in terms of their active range of motion, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance compared to those achieved by the control group. Therefore, pain neuroscience education may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with shoulder pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program completed by patients with shoulder pain. Methods: A randomized, controlled trial was performed. Fifty-five patients satisfied the eligibility criteria, agreed to participate, and were randomized into an experimental group (n = 27) or control group (n = 28). A manual therapy and exercises program was administered for both groups. The experimental group also received a 4-week pain neuroscience education protocol (1 session/week, 75 min per session). The measurements taken included the active range of motion, pain, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance. The outcomes were assessed at baseline and 5 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary outcome analyzed was the group × time interaction. Results: The 2 × 2 analysis of variance revealed a significant group × time interaction for the active range of motion (F = 15.27; p = 0.011), disability (F = 6.14; p = 0.01), catastrophizing (F = 8.79; p = 0.01), kinesiophobia (F = 7.62; p = 0.008), and therapeutic alliance (p = 0.03) in favor of the experimental group. Conclusions: This study showed that the patients with shoulder pain who completed the pain neuroscience program achieved significantly better results in terms of their active range of motion, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance compared to those achieved by the control group. Therefore, pain neuroscience education may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with shoulder pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在慢性肩痛患者的多模式物理治疗干预中加入疼痛神经科学教育项目的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
目的:本研究的目的是评估肩痛患者完成疼痛神经科学教育计划的效果。方法:采用随机对照试验。55例患者符合入选标准,同意参与,随机分为实验组(n = 27)和对照组(n = 28)。两组均采用手工治疗和锻炼方案。实验组同时接受为期4周的疼痛神经科学教育方案(1次/周,每次75分钟)。测量包括活动范围、疼痛、残疾、灾难化、运动恐惧症和治疗联盟。结果在基线和治疗完成后5周进行评估。分析的主要结局是组与时间的相互作用。结果:2 × 2方差分析显示,活跃活动度组×时间交互作用显著(F = 15.27;p = 0.011),残疾(F = 6.14;p = 0.01)、灾难化(F = 8.79;p = 0.01),运动恐惧症(F = 7.62;P = 0.008),治疗联合(P = 0.03)有利于实验组。结论:本研究表明,与对照组相比,完成疼痛神经科学课程的肩痛患者在活动活动度、残疾、灾难化、运动恐惧症和治疗联盟方面取得了明显更好的结果。因此,疼痛神经科学教育可能对肩痛患者的治疗有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Toe Clearance Characteristics Between Simulated Obstacle Crossing Using Visual Height Cues and Actual Obstacle Crossing. Sense of Time in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: ADHD and Developmental Dyscalculia from a Dimensional and Transdiagnostic Perspective. Temporal Dynamics of Auditory Evoked Neural Oscillations Under a Paired-Pulse Suppression Paradigm. Neural Complexity of Implicit Attitudes Predicts Exercise Behavior in Hypertensive Patients: An EEG Entropy Study. Exploring the Role of TSPO-PET Imaging Among MRI-Negative Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: From the Perspective of Heterogeneity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1