Correlation between contrast sensitivity and national eye institute visual function questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Rasch scores in patients with open-angle glaucoma: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1186/s12886-025-03928-w
Rieko Nakano, Ryoko Igarashi, Tadamichi Akagi, Yuta Sakaue, Ryu Iikawa, Ayako Tazawa, Kinuko Kamada, Mao Arimatsu, Tetsuya Togano, Takeo Fukuchi
{"title":"Correlation between contrast sensitivity and national eye institute visual function questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Rasch scores in patients with open-angle glaucoma: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rieko Nakano, Ryoko Igarashi, Tadamichi Akagi, Yuta Sakaue, Ryu Iikawa, Ayako Tazawa, Kinuko Kamada, Mao Arimatsu, Tetsuya Togano, Takeo Fukuchi","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-03928-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examined the relationship between contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual field stage/severity in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and correlated CS with Quality of Vision (QOV) scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CS was measured under photopic (100 cd) and mesopic (10 cd) conditions in 218 eyes of 109 patients with OAG aged < 60 years. The glaucoma stages were divided into four groups according to the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24 - 2 or 10 - 2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) standard, and their relationship with CS was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the Japanese version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) in 79 patients were converted into Rasch scores and correlated with CS. Both HFA24-2 and 10 - 2 showed statistically significant improvements in all items except 10.2 cycles per degree (cpd) under mesopic conditions where CS decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Correlations between CS and NEI VFQ-25 Rasch scores were stronger in the worse eye (WE) at HFA24-2, 10 - 2, and foveal sensitivity thresholds. The measurement results strongly correlated under photopic conditions. Comparing the correlations at HFA24-2, 10 - 2, and foveal sensitivity thresholds, the correlation was strongest at the foveal sensitivity threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CS declines with progression in the visual field stage or severity. QOV score tends to decreases with a decline in CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03928-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We examined the relationship between contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual field stage/severity in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and correlated CS with Quality of Vision (QOV) scores.

Methods: CS was measured under photopic (100 cd) and mesopic (10 cd) conditions in 218 eyes of 109 patients with OAG aged < 60 years. The glaucoma stages were divided into four groups according to the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24 - 2 or 10 - 2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) standard, and their relationship with CS was examined.

Results: The results of the Japanese version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) in 79 patients were converted into Rasch scores and correlated with CS. Both HFA24-2 and 10 - 2 showed statistically significant improvements in all items except 10.2 cycles per degree (cpd) under mesopic conditions where CS decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Correlations between CS and NEI VFQ-25 Rasch scores were stronger in the worse eye (WE) at HFA24-2, 10 - 2, and foveal sensitivity thresholds. The measurement results strongly correlated under photopic conditions. Comparing the correlations at HFA24-2, 10 - 2, and foveal sensitivity thresholds, the correlation was strongest at the foveal sensitivity threshold.

Conclusions: CS declines with progression in the visual field stage or severity. QOV score tends to decreases with a decline in CS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开角型青光眼患者对比敏感度与美国眼科学会视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25) Rasch评分相关性的横断面研究
背景:我们研究了开角型青光眼(OAG)患者的对比敏感度(CS)与视野分期/严重程度之间的关系,并将CS与视觉质量(QOV)评分相关联。方法:对109例高龄OAG患者218只眼在光镜(100 cd)和中视镜(10 cd)条件下的CS进行测量。结果:79例患者的日文版《国家眼科研究所视功能问卷-25》(NEI VFQ-25)的结果转化为Rasch评分,并与CS进行相关性分析。HFA24-2和10 -2在所有项目上都有统计学上的显著改善,除了在中观条件下10.2周期/度(cpd), CS显著下降(p)。结论:CS随着视野分期或严重程度的进展而下降。QOV得分有随CS下降而下降的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of prior intravitreal injections on the risk of posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery: a single-surgeon matched case-control study. Computed tomographic dacryocystography combined with multiplanar reconstruction technique in lacrimal duct probe placement. AI-assisted diagnosis of neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a systematic review from optic neuritis to papilledema. Management of refractory periorbital abscesses caused by Streptococcus constellatus: case report. Orthokeratology outperforms myopia control spectacles in slowing myopia progression: a prospective comparative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1