Computer- and Smart-Tablet-Based Self-Administered Treatments in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.3390/brainsci15020122
Célia Ericson, Alisa Latysheva, Sarah-Ève Poirier, Marion Fossard
{"title":"Computer- and Smart-Tablet-Based Self-Administered Treatments in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Célia Ericson, Alisa Latysheva, Sarah-Ève Poirier, Marion Fossard","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15020122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In current clinical practice, resources remain limited and are insufficient to address the needs of people with chronic post-stroke aphasia. To improve access to speech therapy, self-administered therapies using computers or smart tablets are increasingly recommended. In addition to enabling more intensive and prolonged treatment, computer- and smart-tablet-delivered therapies can be highly enjoyable and motivating for patients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic review aimed to identify computer- and smart-tablet-based self-administered treatments and analyze the proposed interventions in terms of treatment targets, effectiveness (considering specificity, generalization, transfer, and maintenance), and clinician involvement (during and/or prior self-administered therapies).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Terms encompassing three main concepts (rehabilitation, self-administration, and aphasia) were used to search three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts against eligibility criteria. Data extraction of included studies was completed by three reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine studies were included in this study. In terms of treatment targets, anomia is the most treated symptom in published studies (<i>n</i> = 24), but the existence of promising studies for other disorders means that the targets can be broadened. Therapies are effective for trained items, and gains are maintained. There is some evidence of transfer effects for treatments targeting the sentence level. Most studies offer training sessions, previous self-administered therapy, and/or observation and monitoring sessions during therapy; more rarely, self-administered therapy is supplemented with face-to-face therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review is the first to focus specifically on self-administered technology-based therapies. It provides important evidence-based information for clinical practice in self-administered therapies via computer or smart tablet.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In current clinical practice, resources remain limited and are insufficient to address the needs of people with chronic post-stroke aphasia. To improve access to speech therapy, self-administered therapies using computers or smart tablets are increasingly recommended. In addition to enabling more intensive and prolonged treatment, computer- and smart-tablet-delivered therapies can be highly enjoyable and motivating for patients.

Aims: This systematic review aimed to identify computer- and smart-tablet-based self-administered treatments and analyze the proposed interventions in terms of treatment targets, effectiveness (considering specificity, generalization, transfer, and maintenance), and clinician involvement (during and/or prior self-administered therapies).

Methods: Terms encompassing three main concepts (rehabilitation, self-administration, and aphasia) were used to search three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts against eligibility criteria. Data extraction of included studies was completed by three reviewers.

Results: Thirty-nine studies were included in this study. In terms of treatment targets, anomia is the most treated symptom in published studies (n = 24), but the existence of promising studies for other disorders means that the targets can be broadened. Therapies are effective for trained items, and gains are maintained. There is some evidence of transfer effects for treatments targeting the sentence level. Most studies offer training sessions, previous self-administered therapy, and/or observation and monitoring sessions during therapy; more rarely, self-administered therapy is supplemented with face-to-face therapy.

Conclusions: This systematic review is the first to focus specifically on self-administered technology-based therapies. It provides important evidence-based information for clinical practice in self-administered therapies via computer or smart tablet.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计算机和智能平板电脑的慢性中风后失语症自我治疗:系统综述。
背景:在目前的临床实践中,资源仍然有限,不足以满足慢性脑卒中后失语症患者的需求。为了提高语言治疗的可及性,越来越多的人推荐使用电脑或智能平板电脑进行自我治疗。除了能够进行更密集和更长时间的治疗外,计算机和智能平板电脑提供的治疗对患者来说是非常愉快和激励的。目的:本系统综述旨在识别基于计算机和智能片剂的自我给药治疗,并从治疗目标、有效性(考虑特异性、泛化、转移和维持)和临床医生参与(在自我给药治疗期间和/或之前)方面分析拟议的干预措施。方法:使用三个主要概念(康复、自我给药和失语)的术语检索三个电子数据库(Scopus、PubMed和PsycINFO)。两位审稿人根据资格标准独立筛选标题和摘要。纳入研究的资料提取由3名审稿人完成。结果:本研究共纳入39项研究。在治疗靶点方面,在已发表的研究中,失范症是治疗最多的症状(n = 24),但其他疾病有希望的研究的存在意味着靶点可以扩大。治疗对训练过的项目是有效的,并且收益保持不变。针对句子水平的治疗有一定的转移效应。大多数研究提供培训课程、先前的自我治疗和/或治疗期间的观察和监测课程;更罕见的是,自我治疗辅以面对面治疗。结论:本系统综述首次特别关注自我管理的基于技术的治疗方法。它为通过计算机或智能平板电脑进行自我治疗的临床实践提供了重要的循证信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Toe Clearance Characteristics Between Simulated Obstacle Crossing Using Visual Height Cues and Actual Obstacle Crossing. Sense of Time in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: ADHD and Developmental Dyscalculia from a Dimensional and Transdiagnostic Perspective. Temporal Dynamics of Auditory Evoked Neural Oscillations Under a Paired-Pulse Suppression Paradigm. Neural Complexity of Implicit Attitudes Predicts Exercise Behavior in Hypertensive Patients: An EEG Entropy Study. Exploring the Role of TSPO-PET Imaging Among MRI-Negative Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: From the Perspective of Heterogeneity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1