Understanding Pediatric Bipolar Disorder Through the Investigation of Clinical, Neuroanatomic, Neurophysiological and Neurocognitive Dimensions: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.3390/brainsci15020152
Alessio Simonetti, Evelina Bernardi, Sherin Kurian, Antonio Restaino, Claudia Calderoni, Emanuela De Chiara, Francesca Bardi, Gabriele Sani, Jair C Soares, Kirti Saxena
{"title":"Understanding Pediatric Bipolar Disorder Through the Investigation of Clinical, Neuroanatomic, Neurophysiological and Neurocognitive Dimensions: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Alessio Simonetti, Evelina Bernardi, Sherin Kurian, Antonio Restaino, Claudia Calderoni, Emanuela De Chiara, Francesca Bardi, Gabriele Sani, Jair C Soares, Kirti Saxena","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15020152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Pathophysiological models of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) are lacking. Multimodal approaches may provide a comprehensive description of the complex relationship between the brain and behavior. <b>Aim</b>: To assess behavioral, neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical alterations in youth with PBD. <b>Methods</b>: Subjects with PBD (n = 23) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 23) underwent (a) clinical assessments encompassing the severity of psychiatric symptoms, (b) neuropsychological evaluation, (c) analyses of event-related potentials (related to the passive viewing of fearful, neutral, and happy faces during electroencephalography recording, and (d) cortical thickness and deep gray matter volume measurement using magnetic resonance imaging. Canonical correlation analyses were used to assess the relationships between these dimensions. <b>Results</b>: Youth with PBD had higher levels of anxiety (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and borderline personality features (<i>p</i> < 0.001), greater commission errors for negative stimuli (<i>p</i> = 0.003), delayed deliberation time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and smaller risk adjustment scores (<i>p</i> = 0.002) than HCs. Furthermore, they showed cortical thinning in the frontal, parietal, and occipital areas (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) and greater P300 for happy faces (<i>p</i> = 0.29). In youth with PBD, cortical thickening and P300 amplitude positively correlated with more commission errors for negative stimuli, longer deliberation times, reduced risk adjustment, higher levels of panic and separation anxiety, and greater levels of negative relationships, whereas they negatively correlated with levels of depression (overall loadings > or <0.3). <b>Limitations:</b> Small sample size, cross-sectional design, and limited variables investigated. <b>Conclusions</b>: This preliminary work showed that multimodal assessment might be a viable tool for providing a pathophysiological model that unifies brain and behavioral alterations in youth with PBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathophysiological models of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) are lacking. Multimodal approaches may provide a comprehensive description of the complex relationship between the brain and behavior. Aim: To assess behavioral, neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical alterations in youth with PBD. Methods: Subjects with PBD (n = 23) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 23) underwent (a) clinical assessments encompassing the severity of psychiatric symptoms, (b) neuropsychological evaluation, (c) analyses of event-related potentials (related to the passive viewing of fearful, neutral, and happy faces during electroencephalography recording, and (d) cortical thickness and deep gray matter volume measurement using magnetic resonance imaging. Canonical correlation analyses were used to assess the relationships between these dimensions. Results: Youth with PBD had higher levels of anxiety (p < 0.001) and borderline personality features (p < 0.001), greater commission errors for negative stimuli (p = 0.003), delayed deliberation time (p < 0.001), and smaller risk adjustment scores (p = 0.002) than HCs. Furthermore, they showed cortical thinning in the frontal, parietal, and occipital areas (all p < 0.001) and greater P300 for happy faces (p = 0.29). In youth with PBD, cortical thickening and P300 amplitude positively correlated with more commission errors for negative stimuli, longer deliberation times, reduced risk adjustment, higher levels of panic and separation anxiety, and greater levels of negative relationships, whereas they negatively correlated with levels of depression (overall loadings > or <0.3). Limitations: Small sample size, cross-sectional design, and limited variables investigated. Conclusions: This preliminary work showed that multimodal assessment might be a viable tool for providing a pathophysiological model that unifies brain and behavioral alterations in youth with PBD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过临床、神经解剖学、神经生理学和神经认知维度的调查了解儿童双相情感障碍:一项初步研究。
背景:目前缺乏儿童双相情感障碍(PBD)的病理生理模型。多模态方法可以对大脑和行为之间的复杂关系提供全面的描述。目的:评估青少年PBD的行为、神经心理、神经生理和神经解剖学改变。方法:患有PBD的受试者(n = 23)和健康对照(hc, n = 23)进行了(a)包括精神症状严重程度的临床评估,(b)神经心理学评估,(c)事件相关电位分析(在脑电图记录中与恐惧、中性和快乐面孔的被动观看相关),以及(d)皮质厚度和深部灰质体积测量使用磁共振成像。典型相关分析用于评估这些维度之间的关系。结果:PBD青年患者的焦虑水平(p < 0.001)和边缘性人格特征水平(p < 0.001)较高,对负面刺激的委托误差较大(p = 0.003),考虑时间延迟(p < 0.001),风险调整得分较低(p = 0.002)。此外,他们还发现前额、顶叶和枕叶皮质变薄(均p < 0.001),快乐面孔的P300更高(p = 0.29)。在患有PBD的青少年中,皮质增厚和P300振幅与更多的负性刺激错误、更长的考虑时间、更低的风险调整、更高水平的恐慌和分离焦虑以及更高水平的负性关系呈正相关,而它们与抑郁水平呈负相关(总体负荷b>或局限性:小样本量、横断面设计和有限的变量调查)。结论:这项初步研究表明,多模式评估可能是一种可行的工具,可以提供一个病理生理模型,将青年PBD患者的大脑和行为改变结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Toe Clearance Characteristics Between Simulated Obstacle Crossing Using Visual Height Cues and Actual Obstacle Crossing. Sense of Time in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: ADHD and Developmental Dyscalculia from a Dimensional and Transdiagnostic Perspective. Temporal Dynamics of Auditory Evoked Neural Oscillations Under a Paired-Pulse Suppression Paradigm. Neural Complexity of Implicit Attitudes Predicts Exercise Behavior in Hypertensive Patients: An EEG Entropy Study. Exploring the Role of TSPO-PET Imaging Among MRI-Negative Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: From the Perspective of Heterogeneity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1