Analysis of functional outcomes and complications of tibial bone defects treated with Ilizarov bone transport technique.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w
Yaxin Zhang, Jidong Wang, Baoliang Jiao, Dongwei Feng, Zhaowei Li
{"title":"Analysis of functional outcomes and complications of tibial bone defects treated with Ilizarov bone transport technique.","authors":"Yaxin Zhang, Jidong Wang, Baoliang Jiao, Dongwei Feng, Zhaowei Li","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trifocal bone transport (TF) rather than bifocal bone transport (BF) can shorten the treatment time when treating of large bone defect in tibia. However, few studies have reported efficacy and complications among different bone transport.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of bone transport technique for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study including 48 patients who underwent bone transport for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia from May 2015 to September 2019. A total of 30 were treated by bifocal bone transport (BF group) and 18 by trifocal bone transport (TF group). Patient demographic data, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative variables, complications and clinical outcomes of the two groups were recorded and compared at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative complications were also evaluated according to Paley classification. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated at the last clinical follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients with an average follow-up of 27.5 months. All patients achieved complete union in the docking site and consolidation in the regenerate bone. Compared to the BF group, the TF group had a longer bone defect length(9.08 ± 1.74 > 6.33 ± 3.15, P < 0.01) but a shorter external fixation index (42.22 ± 2.41 < 65.82 ± 6.98, P < 0.001). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.6 and 1.7 for BF and TF patients (P > 0.05). At the postoperative follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the bone and functional results (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For tibial bone defects, both bifocal and trifocal bone transport can achieve good clinical results. Compared to the bifocal bone transport, The trifocal bone transport can significantly shorten the external fixation index without increasing the incidence of associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trifocal bone transport (TF) rather than bifocal bone transport (BF) can shorten the treatment time when treating of large bone defect in tibia. However, few studies have reported efficacy and complications among different bone transport.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of bone transport technique for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia.

Methods: The retrospective study including 48 patients who underwent bone transport for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia from May 2015 to September 2019. A total of 30 were treated by bifocal bone transport (BF group) and 18 by trifocal bone transport (TF group). Patient demographic data, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative variables, complications and clinical outcomes of the two groups were recorded and compared at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative complications were also evaluated according to Paley classification. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated at the last clinical follow-up.

Results: All patients with an average follow-up of 27.5 months. All patients achieved complete union in the docking site and consolidation in the regenerate bone. Compared to the BF group, the TF group had a longer bone defect length(9.08 ± 1.74 > 6.33 ± 3.15, P < 0.01) but a shorter external fixation index (42.22 ± 2.41 < 65.82 ± 6.98, P < 0.001). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.6 and 1.7 for BF and TF patients (P > 0.05). At the postoperative follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the bone and functional results (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: For tibial bone defects, both bifocal and trifocal bone transport can achieve good clinical results. Compared to the bifocal bone transport, The trifocal bone transport can significantly shorten the external fixation index without increasing the incidence of associated complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ilizarov骨转运技术治疗胫骨骨缺损的功能结局及并发症分析。
背景:在治疗胫骨大面积骨缺损时,三焦骨转运(TF)比双焦骨转运(BF)能缩短治疗时间。然而,很少有研究报道不同骨运输方式的疗效和并发症。目的:评价骨转运技术治疗胫骨大面积骨缺损的疗效及并发症。方法:对2015年5月至2019年9月行骨转运治疗胫骨大面积骨缺损的48例患者进行回顾性研究。双焦点骨运输组30例,三焦点骨运输组18例。记录两组患者的人口学资料、术中结果、术后变量、并发症和临床结果,并在至少24个月的随访中进行比较。根据Paley分类对术后并发症进行评估。最后一次临床随访时,参照美国Ilizarov方法研究与应用协会(ASAMI)标准对患者的骨骼和功能进行评估。结果:所有患者平均随访27.5个月。所有患者在对接部位均实现完全愈合,再生骨均实现实变。与BF组相比,TF组骨缺损长度更长(9.08±1.74 bb0 6.33±3.15 bb0, P 0.05)。术后随访,两组患者骨功能指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:对于胫骨骨缺损,双焦点和三焦点骨转运均可取得良好的临床效果。与双焦点骨运输相比,三焦点骨运输可显著缩短外固定指数,且不增加相关并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological profile and factors associated with length of stay in patients with acetabular fractures at a level 1 trauma center in Nepal: a retrospective analytical study. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric head posture measurement in patients with neck pain and hamstring tightness. Quantitative assessment of supraspinatus fatty infiltration on a novel MRI section: comparison with conventional methods. Efficacy of mobilization with movement in chronic shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. The association between body mass index and osteoporosis, with consideration of sex differences: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1