{"title":"<i>Bacillus subtilis</i> Contributes to Amylase Production in the Honey Sac of <i>Apis mellifera</i>.","authors":"Miao Wang, Wenzheng Zhao, Danyin Zhou, Jian Huang","doi":"10.3390/insects16020221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amylase activity is a critical biomarker for assessing the freshness of honey. Historically, bees have been considered the sole source of honey amylase. However, recent studies suggest that <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> may also contribute to amylase production in the honey sac of <i>Apis mellifera</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, amylase levels were measured in samples of nectar, honey sac fluid, and honey. The identification of <i>B. subtilis</i> in nectar, honey sac, and honey was evaluated. An in vitro bacterial culture system and a feeding experiment were developed to simulate honey sac conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that <i>B. subtilis</i> was detected in all sample groups, with the highest concentration in honey sac samples. Amylase levels in honey sac and honey samples were significantly higher than those in nectar. In the simulation experiment, amylase activity was only observed in cultures containing both <i>B. subtilis</i> and sucrose/nectar; no activity was detected in cultures containing only H<sub>2</sub>O or no <i>B. subtilis</i>. In the feeding experiment, bees fed sucrose or nectar showed higher amylase activity in their honey sacs than those fed water.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data show that <i>B. subtilis</i> can produce amylase and offer potential for more standardized quality assessment of honey.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Amylase activity is a critical biomarker for assessing the freshness of honey. Historically, bees have been considered the sole source of honey amylase. However, recent studies suggest that Bacillus subtilis may also contribute to amylase production in the honey sac of Apis mellifera.
Methods: In this study, amylase levels were measured in samples of nectar, honey sac fluid, and honey. The identification of B. subtilis in nectar, honey sac, and honey was evaluated. An in vitro bacterial culture system and a feeding experiment were developed to simulate honey sac conditions.
Results: Our results showed that B. subtilis was detected in all sample groups, with the highest concentration in honey sac samples. Amylase levels in honey sac and honey samples were significantly higher than those in nectar. In the simulation experiment, amylase activity was only observed in cultures containing both B. subtilis and sucrose/nectar; no activity was detected in cultures containing only H2O or no B. subtilis. In the feeding experiment, bees fed sucrose or nectar showed higher amylase activity in their honey sacs than those fed water.
Conclusions: Our data show that B. subtilis can produce amylase and offer potential for more standardized quality assessment of honey.
InsectsAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍:
Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.