Cesarean section diverticulum area predicting the intraoperative hemorrhage at suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy after focused ultrasound ablation surgery.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Hyperthermia Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1080/02656736.2025.2468757
Jun-Rong Huang, Li-Ya Sun, Ying Tang, Ming-Bo Wen, Ming-Tao Yang, Fan Xu, Qiuling Shi, Hui-Quan Hu
{"title":"Cesarean section diverticulum area predicting the intraoperative hemorrhage at suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy after focused ultrasound ablation surgery.","authors":"Jun-Rong Huang, Li-Ya Sun, Ying Tang, Ming-Bo Wen, Ming-Tao Yang, Fan Xu, Qiuling Shi, Hui-Quan Hu","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2025.2468757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the significance of the cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) area for predicting the intraoperative massive hemorrhage during suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 90 patients undergoing suction curettage after FUAS were collected. According to their intraoperative bleeding volume, patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 71, <200 mL), Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 9, 200-300 mL) and Group 3 (<i>n</i> = 10, ≥300 mL). Multiple liner regression analysis was performed to identify the influencing factors for CSD area and intraoperative blood loss. The ROC curve was plotted to identify the optimal cutoff values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median CSD area size in Group 3 (336.8 mm<sup>2</sup>) was significantly greater than in Groups 1 (128.6 mm<sup>2</sup>) and 2 (121.6 mm<sup>2</sup>) (<i>p</i> < .05). Using multiple linear regression analysis, CSD area was associated with intraoperative blood loss (<i>p</i> < .05). The optimal cutoff CSD areas for predicting intraoperative massive hemorrhage volumes ≥ 200 mL and ≥ 300 mL were 202.05 mm<sup>2</sup> and 241.90 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The mean gestational sac diameter and preoperative symptoms (+) were positively related to CSD area, while residual myometrial thickness was negatively correlated with the CSD area. CSD area showed the greatest relationship to sonication time (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.42), treatment time (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.316) and total energy used for ablation (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.415).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preoperative CSD area could predict intraoperative massive hemorrhage during suction curettage after FUAS, which might inform therapy strategies for CSP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","volume":"42 1","pages":"2468757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2468757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the significance of the cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) area for predicting the intraoperative massive hemorrhage during suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS).

Methods: Data from 90 patients undergoing suction curettage after FUAS were collected. According to their intraoperative bleeding volume, patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (n = 71, <200 mL), Group 2 (n = 9, 200-300 mL) and Group 3 (n = 10, ≥300 mL). Multiple liner regression analysis was performed to identify the influencing factors for CSD area and intraoperative blood loss. The ROC curve was plotted to identify the optimal cutoff values.

Results: The median CSD area size in Group 3 (336.8 mm2) was significantly greater than in Groups 1 (128.6 mm2) and 2 (121.6 mm2) (p < .05). Using multiple linear regression analysis, CSD area was associated with intraoperative blood loss (p < .05). The optimal cutoff CSD areas for predicting intraoperative massive hemorrhage volumes ≥ 200 mL and ≥ 300 mL were 202.05 mm2 and 241.90 mm2, respectively. The mean gestational sac diameter and preoperative symptoms (+) were positively related to CSD area, while residual myometrial thickness was negatively correlated with the CSD area. CSD area showed the greatest relationship to sonication time (rs = 0.42), treatment time (rs = 0.316) and total energy used for ablation (rs = 0.415).

Conclusion: The preoperative CSD area could predict intraoperative massive hemorrhage during suction curettage after FUAS, which might inform therapy strategies for CSP patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hyperthermia
期刊最新文献
Nomogram for predicting the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids based on oxytocin experimentation and ultrasonographic features: a retrospective single-center study. Thyroid nodule rupture after thermal ablation for benign thyroid nodules: incidence, risk factors, and clinical management. A translational review of hyperthermia biology. Osteoarthritis-related knee pain: MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation treatment. The role of HSPA14 in breast cancer: implications for tumorigenesis, immune response modulation, and personalized therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1