Prevalence study of antimicrobial resistant organisms in very preterm neonates.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s11845-025-03903-w
Elaine Houlihan, Anna McCormick, Carol O ' Connor, Susan J Knowles
{"title":"Prevalence study of antimicrobial resistant organisms in very preterm neonates.","authors":"Elaine Houlihan, Anna McCormick, Carol O ' Connor, Susan J Knowles","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03903-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm neonates have underdeveloped organs, a fragile skin barrier and an immature immune system rendering them susceptible to infection. These infants are at an increased risk of developing a healthcare-associated infection because of antibiotic exposure, invasive monitoring and the general risk of outbreaks within a hospital setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of antimicrobial resistant organism carriage in very preterm neonates (i.e. born ≤ 32 weeks gestation) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neonates born ≤ 32 weeks' gestation in NMH from September 2022 to January 2023 were included. Swabs were taken at admission and fortnightly until week 10 of life. Screening investigations included ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases) and AmpC producers, organisms resistant to gentamicin and ciprofloxacin, CPE (Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales), MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci). This differed from baseline screening by frequency of screening, and the recording of presence of AmpC-producers and ciprofloxacin-resistance. Ethical approval was sought and granted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 20 out of the 53 neonates (38%) included in the study were colonised with one or more resistant-gram-negative organism; 5 with ESBL (9%), 2 resistant to gentamicin (4%), 6 resistant to ciprofloxacin (11%) and 14 (26%) with AmpC producers. Three (6%) resistant gram-negative bacilli were detected on admission screens, and resistance rates peaked at week 4 where 14 screens were positive. No CPE, MRSA or VRE were isolated.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in a vulnerable patient cohort, the very preterm infants. This review should prompt revision of the importance of infection prevention and control, antimicrobial stewardship and regular MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism) screening in the neonatal critical care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"623-629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03903-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm neonates have underdeveloped organs, a fragile skin barrier and an immature immune system rendering them susceptible to infection. These infants are at an increased risk of developing a healthcare-associated infection because of antibiotic exposure, invasive monitoring and the general risk of outbreaks within a hospital setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of antimicrobial resistant organism carriage in very preterm neonates (i.e. born ≤ 32 weeks gestation) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: Neonates born ≤ 32 weeks' gestation in NMH from September 2022 to January 2023 were included. Swabs were taken at admission and fortnightly until week 10 of life. Screening investigations included ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases) and AmpC producers, organisms resistant to gentamicin and ciprofloxacin, CPE (Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales), MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci). This differed from baseline screening by frequency of screening, and the recording of presence of AmpC-producers and ciprofloxacin-resistance. Ethical approval was sought and granted.

Results: Overall, 20 out of the 53 neonates (38%) included in the study were colonised with one or more resistant-gram-negative organism; 5 with ESBL (9%), 2 resistant to gentamicin (4%), 6 resistant to ciprofloxacin (11%) and 14 (26%) with AmpC producers. Three (6%) resistant gram-negative bacilli were detected on admission screens, and resistance rates peaked at week 4 where 14 screens were positive. No CPE, MRSA or VRE were isolated.

Discussion/conclusion: This study highlights the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in a vulnerable patient cohort, the very preterm infants. This review should prompt revision of the importance of infection prevention and control, antimicrobial stewardship and regular MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism) screening in the neonatal critical care setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产新生儿中抗菌药耐药菌的流行研究。
背景:早产儿器官发育不全,皮肤屏障脆弱,免疫系统不成熟,易受感染。由于抗生素暴露、侵入性监测以及在医院环境中爆发的一般风险,这些婴儿发生卫生保健相关感染的风险增加。本研究的目的是调查新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中极早产新生儿(即出生≤32周妊娠)耐药菌携带的流行情况。方法:选取2022年9月至2023年1月在NMH出生的妊娠≤32周的新生儿。入院时采集棉签,每两周采集一次,直到第10周。筛选调查包括ESBL(扩展谱β -内酰胺酶)和AmpC生产者,对庆大霉素和环丙沙星耐药的生物,CPE(产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌),MRSA(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)和VRE(耐万古霉素肠球菌)。这与基线筛查的频率、ampc生产者的存在和环丙沙星耐药性的记录不同。寻求并批准了伦理许可。结果:总体而言,纳入研究的53名新生儿中有20名(38%)被一种或多种耐药革兰氏阴性菌定植;ESBL 5例(9%),庆大霉素耐药2例(4%),环丙沙星耐药6例(11%),AmpC生产商耐药14例(26%)。入院筛查中检出3株(6%)耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌,在第4周耐药率达到高峰,14株筛查呈阳性。未分离到CPE、MRSA或VRE。讨论/结论:本研究强调了抗生素耐药菌在易感患者队列(极早产儿)中的流行。这一综述应促使修订感染预防和控制、抗菌药物管理和在新生儿重症监护环境中定期MDRO(多药耐药菌)筛查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
期刊最新文献
Challenging convention: primary ureteroscopy for stone disease with concomitant infection-a multicentre study. Role of alternative splicing in cancer progression. Diagnostic value of thyroglobulin levels in fine-needle aspiration for evaluating metastatic cervical lymph nodes in papillary thyroid cancer. Important learning points for setting up a dental-oncology service in Ireland. Sir Peter Freyer Surgical Symposium 2025 University of Galway 5th & 6th September 2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1