Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Cervical Cancer: Challenges in Resource-Limited Settings with High Prevalence of Large Tumours.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/jcm14041381
Szilárd Leó Kiss, Mihai Stanca, Dan Mihai Căpîlna, Tudor Emil Căpîlna, Maria Pop-Suciu, Botond Istvan Kiss, Szilárd Leó Kiss, Mihai Emil Căpîlna
{"title":"Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Cervical Cancer: Challenges in Resource-Limited Settings with High Prevalence of Large Tumours.","authors":"Szilárd Leó Kiss, Mihai Stanca, Dan Mihai Căpîlna, Tudor Emil Căpîlna, Maria Pop-Suciu, Botond Istvan Kiss, Szilárd Leó Kiss, Mihai Emil Căpîlna","doi":"10.3390/jcm14041381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cervical cancer primarily disseminates through the lymphatic system, with the metastatic involvement of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes significantly impacting prognosis and treatment decisions. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is critical in guiding surgical management. However, resource-limited settings often lack advanced detection tools like indocyanine green (ICG). This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of SLN biopsy using alternative techniques in a high-risk population with a high prevalence of large tumours. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective, observational study included 42 patients with FIGO 2018 stage IA1-IIA1 cervical cancer treated between November 2019 and April 2024. SLN mapping was performed using methylene blue alone or combined with a technetium-99m radiotracer. Detection rates, sensitivity, and false-negative rates were analysed. Additional endpoints included tracer technique comparisons, SLN localization patterns, and factors influencing detection success. <b>Results</b>: SLNs were identified in 78.6% of cases, with bilateral detection in 57.1%. The combined technique yielded higher detection rates (93.3% overall, 80% bilateral) compared to methylene blue alone (70.4% overall, 40.7% bilateral, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The sensitivity and negative predictive values were 70% and 93.87%, respectively. Larger tumours (>4 cm), deep stromal invasion, and prior conization negatively impacted detection rates. False-negative SLNs were associated with larger tumours and positive lymphovascular space invasion. <b>Conclusions</b>: SLN biopsy is feasible in resource-limited settings, with improved detection rates using combined tracer techniques. However, sensitivity remains suboptimal due to a steep learning curve and challenges in high-risk patients. Until a high detection accuracy is achieved, SLN mapping should complement, rather than replace, pelvic lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer primarily disseminates through the lymphatic system, with the metastatic involvement of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes significantly impacting prognosis and treatment decisions. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is critical in guiding surgical management. However, resource-limited settings often lack advanced detection tools like indocyanine green (ICG). This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of SLN biopsy using alternative techniques in a high-risk population with a high prevalence of large tumours. Methods: This prospective, observational study included 42 patients with FIGO 2018 stage IA1-IIA1 cervical cancer treated between November 2019 and April 2024. SLN mapping was performed using methylene blue alone or combined with a technetium-99m radiotracer. Detection rates, sensitivity, and false-negative rates were analysed. Additional endpoints included tracer technique comparisons, SLN localization patterns, and factors influencing detection success. Results: SLNs were identified in 78.6% of cases, with bilateral detection in 57.1%. The combined technique yielded higher detection rates (93.3% overall, 80% bilateral) compared to methylene blue alone (70.4% overall, 40.7% bilateral, p < 0.05). The sensitivity and negative predictive values were 70% and 93.87%, respectively. Larger tumours (>4 cm), deep stromal invasion, and prior conization negatively impacted detection rates. False-negative SLNs were associated with larger tumours and positive lymphovascular space invasion. Conclusions: SLN biopsy is feasible in resource-limited settings, with improved detection rates using combined tracer techniques. However, sensitivity remains suboptimal due to a steep learning curve and challenges in high-risk patients. Until a high detection accuracy is achieved, SLN mapping should complement, rather than replace, pelvic lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌前哨淋巴结检测:在大肿瘤高流行的资源有限的环境中的挑战。
背景/目的:宫颈癌主要通过淋巴系统传播,骨盆和主动脉旁淋巴结的转移累及显著影响预后和治疗决策。前哨淋巴结(SLN)定位是指导手术治疗的关键。然而,资源有限的环境往往缺乏先进的检测工具,如吲哚菁绿(ICG)。本研究评估了在大肿瘤高发的高危人群中使用替代技术进行SLN活检的可行性和有效性。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了2019年11月至2024年4月期间接受FIGO 2018期IA1-IIA1宫颈癌治疗的42例患者。使用亚甲基蓝单独或与锝-99m放射性示踪剂联合进行SLN制图。分析检出率、灵敏度和假阴性率。其他终点包括示踪技术比较、SLN定位模式和影响检测成功的因素。结果:78.6%的病例检出单侧淋巴结,57.1%的病例检出双侧淋巴结。联合技术的检出率(总检出率93.3%,双侧检出率80%)高于单独亚甲蓝(总检出率70.4%,双侧检出率40.7%,p < 0.05)。敏感性为70%,阴性预测值为93.87%。较大的肿瘤(bbb4cm),深部间质浸润和先前的锥形对检出率有负面影响。假阴性sln与较大的肿瘤和淋巴血管间隙浸润阳性相关。结论:在资源有限的情况下,SLN活检是可行的,使用联合示踪技术可以提高检出率。然而,由于陡峭的学习曲线和高风险患者的挑战,敏感性仍然不是最佳的。在达到较高的检测精度之前,SLN作图应作为高危病例盆腔淋巴结切除术的补充,而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Association Between MGMT Promoter Methylation and Clinical and Lifestyle Factors in Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Study in Korea. Genetic Syndromes and Multimorbidity in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Insights from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry. The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Tumor-Related Amputations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 132 Cases over Two Decades. Assessing Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1