"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0525
Julia I Bandini, Jeannette Tsuei, Dio Kavalieratos, Sangeeta C Ahluwalia, Enrique Vazquez, Kimberly Curseen, Jordan M Harrison
{"title":"\"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity\": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients.","authors":"Julia I Bandini, Jeannette Tsuei, Dio Kavalieratos, Sangeeta C Ahluwalia, Enrique Vazquez, Kimberly Curseen, Jordan M Harrison","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Telehealth for outpatient palliative care has grown rapidly since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet there remain important questions about the use of telehealth for underserved patient populations in a \"postpandemic\" society. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine current perspectives from interdisciplinary providers on the use of telehealth and in-person care for outpatient palliative care among underserved patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted semi-structured interviews with outpatient palliative care providers and clinic staff (<i>n</i> = 17) from one health system in the United States. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Providers endorsed tele-palliative care for underserved patients because it enhanced patient-centered care and increased equity. However, providers noted two main challenges to the use of telehealth: technological issues on the part of patients and policies around prescribing controlled substances. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Future efforts to improve tele-palliative care for underserved patients may focus on technological and institutional infrastructure to support telehealth and consider policies around prescribing controlled substances for palliative care patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"655-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth for outpatient palliative care has grown rapidly since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet there remain important questions about the use of telehealth for underserved patient populations in a "postpandemic" society. Objective: To examine current perspectives from interdisciplinary providers on the use of telehealth and in-person care for outpatient palliative care among underserved patients. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with outpatient palliative care providers and clinic staff (n = 17) from one health system in the United States. Results: Providers endorsed tele-palliative care for underserved patients because it enhanced patient-centered care and increased equity. However, providers noted two main challenges to the use of telehealth: technological issues on the part of patients and policies around prescribing controlled substances. Conclusions: Future efforts to improve tele-palliative care for underserved patients may focus on technological and institutional infrastructure to support telehealth and consider policies around prescribing controlled substances for palliative care patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“远程医疗允许灵活性和更多的公平”:提供者的观点远程医疗门诊姑息治疗服务不足的病人。
背景:自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,门诊姑息治疗的远程医疗迅速发展,但在“大流行后”社会中,对服务不足的患者群体使用远程医疗仍然存在重要问题。目的:研究跨学科提供者对在服务不足的患者中使用远程医疗和面对面护理的门诊姑息治疗的当前观点。方法:我们对来自美国一个卫生系统的门诊姑息治疗提供者和临床工作人员(n = 17)进行了半结构化访谈。结果:提供者支持对服务不足的患者进行远程姑息治疗,因为它增强了以患者为中心的护理并增加了公平性。然而,提供者注意到使用远程保健面临的两个主要挑战:患者方面的技术问题和有关管制药物处方的政策。结论:未来改善对服务不足患者的远程姑息治疗的努力可侧重于支持远程医疗的技术和机构基础设施,并考虑围绕为姑息治疗患者处方受控物质的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Discrepancies Between Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based eGFR Estimation in Palliative Care Patients and Their Implications on Drug Dosing. Half of Hospice and Palliative Care Unit Inpatients' Family Members Are Surprised by Death. Silver Linings. The Family that Never Shows Up. A Blueprint for Implementing Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy in Palliative Care: Design, Process, and Treatment Patterns of a Real-World Clinical Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1