Inhibitory effects of phenolic compounds from blueberry leaf on α-amylase and α-glucosidase: kinetics, mode of action, and molecular interactions.

IF 3.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1002/jsfa.14187
Han Wu, Xiaoli Liu, Shudong Xie, Jianzhong Zhou, Maria G Corradini, Yue Pan, Xiaozhen Cui
{"title":"Inhibitory effects of phenolic compounds from blueberry leaf on α-amylase and α-glucosidase: kinetics, mode of action, and molecular interactions.","authors":"Han Wu, Xiaoli Liu, Shudong Xie, Jianzhong Zhou, Maria G Corradini, Yue Pan, Xiaozhen Cui","doi":"10.1002/jsfa.14187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interactions between blueberry leaf polyphenols (BLPs) and digestive enzymes were analyzed using multiple techniques to gain insights into their inhibitory effects on enzyme kinetics and modes of action.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA) was the most abundant compound identified. Quercetin (QR) exhibited the strongest inhibitory activity against α-amylase (α-AMY) and α-glucosidase (α-GLU). The BLP extracts acted as typical mixed-type inhibitors for both digestive enzymes, showing stronger inhibition of α-GLU (IC50 = 7.36 ± 0.03 μg mL<sup>-1</sup>) than α-AMY (IC50 = 12.52 ± 0.65 μg mL<sup>-1</sup>). Stern-Volmer plots showed static quenching of enzyme fluorescence intensity. The quenching and binding constants of α-GLU were higher than those of α-AMY, showing greater affinity of the former for BLP. The conformational changes of 3-CQA and QR in the BLP were studied at the molecular level. The stability of the complexes formed followed this order: α-GLU-3-CQA > α-AMY-QR > α-GLU-QR > α-AMY-3-CQA. This trend supported the observation that QR had a greater impact on α-AMY conformation, whereas 3-CQA more effectively altered α-GLU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings elucidated the inhibitory mechanisms of BLP on glucose-regulating enzymes, providing novel insights relevant for the treatment of diabetes. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":17725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.14187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The interactions between blueberry leaf polyphenols (BLPs) and digestive enzymes were analyzed using multiple techniques to gain insights into their inhibitory effects on enzyme kinetics and modes of action.

Results: 3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA) was the most abundant compound identified. Quercetin (QR) exhibited the strongest inhibitory activity against α-amylase (α-AMY) and α-glucosidase (α-GLU). The BLP extracts acted as typical mixed-type inhibitors for both digestive enzymes, showing stronger inhibition of α-GLU (IC50 = 7.36 ± 0.03 μg mL-1) than α-AMY (IC50 = 12.52 ± 0.65 μg mL-1). Stern-Volmer plots showed static quenching of enzyme fluorescence intensity. The quenching and binding constants of α-GLU were higher than those of α-AMY, showing greater affinity of the former for BLP. The conformational changes of 3-CQA and QR in the BLP were studied at the molecular level. The stability of the complexes formed followed this order: α-GLU-3-CQA > α-AMY-QR > α-GLU-QR > α-AMY-3-CQA. This trend supported the observation that QR had a greater impact on α-AMY conformation, whereas 3-CQA more effectively altered α-GLU.

Conclusion: These findings elucidated the inhibitory mechanisms of BLP on glucose-regulating enzymes, providing novel insights relevant for the treatment of diabetes. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
634
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, mini-reviews, perspectives and spotlights in these areas, with particular emphasis on interdisciplinary studies at the agriculture/ food interface. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) is a unique international forum where science meets business on independent, impartial ground. Anyone can join and current Members include consumers, business people, environmentalists, industrialists, farmers, and researchers. The Society offers a chance to share information between sectors as diverse as food and agriculture, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, materials, chemicals, environmental science and safety. As well as organising educational events, SCI awards a number of prestigious honours and scholarships each year, publishes peer-reviewed journals, and provides Members with news from their sectors in the respected magazine, Chemistry & Industry . Originally established in London in 1881 and in New York in 1894, SCI is a registered charity with Members in over 70 countries.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of key floral components between two Tilia species and among different processing technologies as revealed by widely targeted metabolomic profiling. Inhibitory effects of phenolic compounds from blueberry leaf on α-amylase and α-glucosidase: kinetics, mode of action, and molecular interactions. Prenylation of flavonoids by DMATS1 and their anti-inflammatory activities. Brassica oleracea as a functional crop: phytochemical potential and sustainable applications. Quantifying potassium bromate in flour using a phase-transfer headspace strategy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1