Singaporean attitudes to cognitive enhancement: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Journal of Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2025-10-23 DOI:10.1136/jme-2024-110490
Casey M Haining, Hui Jin Toh, Julian Savulescu, G Owen Schaefer
{"title":"Singaporean attitudes to cognitive enhancement: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Casey M Haining, Hui Jin Toh, Julian Savulescu, G Owen Schaefer","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent developments in genetic technologies have provided prospective parents with increasing opportunities to influence their future child's phenotype. This study aimed to understand public attitudes towards gene-based technologies and services, with a particular focus on improving educational outcomes. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among a Singaporean population (n=1438), adapting a survey instrument previously used in the US context. Our results suggested that Singaporeans had a greater moral acceptance of, and willingness to use, genetic technologies and services compared with the US population. Among the technologies examined, the use of polygenic embryo screening was considered more acceptable than gene editing. While these public attitudes show some support for the use of these technologies, further research and consultation among multiple stakeholder groups is necessary to determine whether such technology should be used and how it should be regulated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"747-753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12573384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent developments in genetic technologies have provided prospective parents with increasing opportunities to influence their future child's phenotype. This study aimed to understand public attitudes towards gene-based technologies and services, with a particular focus on improving educational outcomes. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among a Singaporean population (n=1438), adapting a survey instrument previously used in the US context. Our results suggested that Singaporeans had a greater moral acceptance of, and willingness to use, genetic technologies and services compared with the US population. Among the technologies examined, the use of polygenic embryo screening was considered more acceptable than gene editing. While these public attitudes show some support for the use of these technologies, further research and consultation among multiple stakeholder groups is necessary to determine whether such technology should be used and how it should be regulated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡人对认知增强的态度:一项横断面调查。
基因技术的最新发展为未来的父母提供了越来越多的机会来影响他们未来孩子的表型。这项研究旨在了解公众对基于基因的技术和服务的态度,特别关注改善教育成果。我们在新加坡人群中进行了一项横断面调查(n=1438),采用了以前在美国使用的调查工具。我们的研究结果表明,与美国人相比,新加坡人对基因技术和服务的道德接受度和使用意愿更高。在研究的技术中,使用多基因胚胎筛选被认为比基因编辑更可接受。虽然这些公众态度表明对这些技术的使用有一定的支持,但需要在多个利益相关者群体之间进行进一步的研究和协商,以确定是否应该使用这些技术以及如何对其进行监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
期刊最新文献
Moral enhancement increases freedom. Equity in the ICU: an exploratory qualitative study of the ethical acceptability of a reserve system for allocating limited ICU resources. There is no consequentialist ethical justification for registries of conscientious non-objectors. Pragmatic defence of the register system: strengthening Clarke's consequentialist case for managing conscientious objection. Guest editorial: Accommodating cultural differences in the International Conference of Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1