Breast cancer patients' experience of menopause care in the UK: thematic analysis of free-text comments.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1097/GME.0000000000002505
Sarah Glynne, Kathy Seymour, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson
{"title":"Breast cancer patients' experience of menopause care in the UK: thematic analysis of free-text comments.","authors":"Sarah Glynne, Kathy Seymour, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a thematic analysis of free-text comments in an online survey that asked women about their experience of menopause care after breast cancer. A coding framework was used that mapped comments to eight domains of patient experience (deductive analysis). An inductive approach was used to identify subthemes within each of the eight domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. Two hundred twenty-six women (18.9%) left free-text comments in response to questions about shared decision making and patient experience. Most were White (96.9%), university educated (52.6%), and aged 41 to 60 years at breast cancer diagnosis (81.8%). The menopausal symptom burden was high (96.5%, 87.6%, and 75.7% reported physical, psychological, and genitourinary symptoms, respectively). Lack of involvement in shared decision making was the dominant theme (n = 120, 53%), followed by issues concerning access to menopause care (n = 65, 29%). Lack of information, communication issues, and feeling unsupported were prevalent themes/subthemes. Twenty women (9%) reported a lack of courtesy and respect in their interactions with healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, women's experience of menopause-related breast cancer aftercare was poor. Larger studies are needed to qualitatively explore the experience, unmet needs, and expectations of all breast cancer survivors including women from more deprived and ethnic minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.

Methods: This study is a thematic analysis of free-text comments in an online survey that asked women about their experience of menopause care after breast cancer. A coding framework was used that mapped comments to eight domains of patient experience (deductive analysis). An inductive approach was used to identify subthemes within each of the eight domains.

Results: A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. Two hundred twenty-six women (18.9%) left free-text comments in response to questions about shared decision making and patient experience. Most were White (96.9%), university educated (52.6%), and aged 41 to 60 years at breast cancer diagnosis (81.8%). The menopausal symptom burden was high (96.5%, 87.6%, and 75.7% reported physical, psychological, and genitourinary symptoms, respectively). Lack of involvement in shared decision making was the dominant theme (n = 120, 53%), followed by issues concerning access to menopause care (n = 65, 29%). Lack of information, communication issues, and feeling unsupported were prevalent themes/subthemes. Twenty women (9%) reported a lack of courtesy and respect in their interactions with healthcare professionals.

Conclusions: In this study, women's experience of menopause-related breast cancer aftercare was poor. Larger studies are needed to qualitatively explore the experience, unmet needs, and expectations of all breast cancer survivors including women from more deprived and ethnic minority groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
期刊最新文献
Exploring heterogeneity in the associations between menopausal status and depression: a cross-sectional study with a unique analytical approach. Unpacking eating disorder risk and resilience during menopause: a biopsychosocial perspective. The role of short luteal phases on cycle regularity during the perimenopausal transition. Fragmented QRS complexes in electrocardiogram and their relationship with somatic symptoms in postmenopausal women. Microablative radiofrequency versus sham for overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1