A Sequential Ultrafiltration Method to Enhance the Accuracy and Throughput in Plasma Protein Binding Tests.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmaceutics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics17020273
Sang Ho Jeon, Min Chang Kim, Haejun Lee, Ju-Hee Oh, Hyun Seo Kim, Heawon Lee, Taehoon Park, Young-Joo Lee
{"title":"A Sequential Ultrafiltration Method to Enhance the Accuracy and Throughput in Plasma Protein Binding Tests.","authors":"Sang Ho Jeon, Min Chang Kim, Haejun Lee, Ju-Hee Oh, Hyun Seo Kim, Heawon Lee, Taehoon Park, Young-Joo Lee","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17020273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: Ultrafiltration (UF) is widely accepted as a method for assessing the plasma protein binding (PPB) of drugs. However, it is vulnerable to non-specific binding (NSB) to the device, which can result in inaccuracies. This study presents a straightforward, high-throughput modified UF method aimed at minimizing bias due to NSB. <b>Methods</b>: The modified UF method, sequential UF, features the addition of a 2 min pre-UF phase designed to saturate the NSB in the device, followed by the main 20 min UF procedure, compared to the conventional UF method. To evaluate the feasibility of this sequential UF method, we measured the PPB of nine compounds using sequential UF and compared these results to those obtained with the conventional mass balance UF method, recognized as a standard for NSB correction. <b>Results</b>: The PPB values determined through sequential UF were generally consistent with those derived from the mass balance UF method. The fold differences ranged from 97.9% to 113.8%, with an average of 103.5%. No significant differences were observed between the two methods for all compounds, with the exception of quercetin, which showed an unusually high PPB. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sequential UF was effective in correcting NSB to the device while providing advantages in terms of simplicity and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":19894,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17020273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Ultrafiltration (UF) is widely accepted as a method for assessing the plasma protein binding (PPB) of drugs. However, it is vulnerable to non-specific binding (NSB) to the device, which can result in inaccuracies. This study presents a straightforward, high-throughput modified UF method aimed at minimizing bias due to NSB. Methods: The modified UF method, sequential UF, features the addition of a 2 min pre-UF phase designed to saturate the NSB in the device, followed by the main 20 min UF procedure, compared to the conventional UF method. To evaluate the feasibility of this sequential UF method, we measured the PPB of nine compounds using sequential UF and compared these results to those obtained with the conventional mass balance UF method, recognized as a standard for NSB correction. Results: The PPB values determined through sequential UF were generally consistent with those derived from the mass balance UF method. The fold differences ranged from 97.9% to 113.8%, with an average of 103.5%. No significant differences were observed between the two methods for all compounds, with the exception of quercetin, which showed an unusually high PPB. Conclusions: Sequential UF was effective in correcting NSB to the device while providing advantages in terms of simplicity and efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutics
Pharmaceutics Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
16.41 days
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications,  and short notes. Covered topics include pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, and pharmaceutical formulation. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical details in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Manipulated Prescribed Medicines for Novel Leads in 3D Printed Personalized Dosage Forms. Development of an Innovative Dual Construct for Targeted Drug Delivery in the Oral Cavity. Pharmacokinetics of Levofloxacin Entrapped in Non-Ionic Surfactant Vesicles (Niosomes) in Sprague Dawley Rats. A Sequential Ultrafiltration Method to Enhance the Accuracy and Throughput in Plasma Protein Binding Tests. Evaluating the Impact of Minimized GnRH and PGF Analogues-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles on Ovarian Activity and Fertility of Heat-Stressed Dairy Cows.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1