A Sequential Ultrafiltration Method to Enhance the Accuracy and Throughput in Plasma Protein Binding Tests.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmaceutics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics17020273
Sang Ho Jeon, Min Chang Kim, Haejun Lee, Ju-Hee Oh, Hyun Seo Kim, Heawon Lee, Taehoon Park, Young-Joo Lee
{"title":"A Sequential Ultrafiltration Method to Enhance the Accuracy and Throughput in Plasma Protein Binding Tests.","authors":"Sang Ho Jeon, Min Chang Kim, Haejun Lee, Ju-Hee Oh, Hyun Seo Kim, Heawon Lee, Taehoon Park, Young-Joo Lee","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17020273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: Ultrafiltration (UF) is widely accepted as a method for assessing the plasma protein binding (PPB) of drugs. However, it is vulnerable to non-specific binding (NSB) to the device, which can result in inaccuracies. This study presents a straightforward, high-throughput modified UF method aimed at minimizing bias due to NSB. <b>Methods</b>: The modified UF method, sequential UF, features the addition of a 2 min pre-UF phase designed to saturate the NSB in the device, followed by the main 20 min UF procedure, compared to the conventional UF method. To evaluate the feasibility of this sequential UF method, we measured the PPB of nine compounds using sequential UF and compared these results to those obtained with the conventional mass balance UF method, recognized as a standard for NSB correction. <b>Results</b>: The PPB values determined through sequential UF were generally consistent with those derived from the mass balance UF method. The fold differences ranged from 97.9% to 113.8%, with an average of 103.5%. No significant differences were observed between the two methods for all compounds, with the exception of quercetin, which showed an unusually high PPB. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sequential UF was effective in correcting NSB to the device while providing advantages in terms of simplicity and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":19894,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11859236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17020273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Ultrafiltration (UF) is widely accepted as a method for assessing the plasma protein binding (PPB) of drugs. However, it is vulnerable to non-specific binding (NSB) to the device, which can result in inaccuracies. This study presents a straightforward, high-throughput modified UF method aimed at minimizing bias due to NSB. Methods: The modified UF method, sequential UF, features the addition of a 2 min pre-UF phase designed to saturate the NSB in the device, followed by the main 20 min UF procedure, compared to the conventional UF method. To evaluate the feasibility of this sequential UF method, we measured the PPB of nine compounds using sequential UF and compared these results to those obtained with the conventional mass balance UF method, recognized as a standard for NSB correction. Results: The PPB values determined through sequential UF were generally consistent with those derived from the mass balance UF method. The fold differences ranged from 97.9% to 113.8%, with an average of 103.5%. No significant differences were observed between the two methods for all compounds, with the exception of quercetin, which showed an unusually high PPB. Conclusions: Sequential UF was effective in correcting NSB to the device while providing advantages in terms of simplicity and efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种提高血浆蛋白结合检测准确性和通量的序贯超滤方法。
目的:超滤(UF)是一种被广泛接受的评价药物血浆蛋白结合(PPB)的方法。然而,它容易受到设备的非特异性绑定(NSB)的影响,这可能导致不准确。本研究提出了一种简单、高通量的改进UF方法,旨在最大限度地减少NSB引起的偏置。方法:与传统的超滤法相比,改进的超滤法,即顺序超滤法,其特点是增加2分钟的预超滤相,以使装置中的NSB饱和,然后进行20分钟的主要超滤程序。为了评估该方法的可行性,我们使用序列UF测量了9种化合物的PPB,并将这些结果与传统的质量平衡UF法进行了比较,后者被认为是NSB校正的标准。结果:序贯UF法测定的PPB值与质量平衡UF法测定的PPB值基本一致。倍差范围为97.9% ~ 113.8%,平均为103.5%。除槲皮素的PPB异常高外,两种方法对所有化合物均无显著差异。结论:序贯UF在纠正NSB方面是有效的,同时在简单和高效方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutics
Pharmaceutics Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
16.41 days
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications,  and short notes. Covered topics include pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, and pharmaceutical formulation. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical details in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Chemical Characterization and Evaluation of Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Synergistic Activities of Teucrium polium L.: An Integrated Experimental and In Silico Approach. Predicting Drug Loading Capacity for PLA-Amorphous Drug System Using Hansen Solubility Parameters. Exploring Key Factors Affecting the Encapsulation Efficiency of Ligusticum Chuanxiong-Vinegar Cyperus Rotundus Essential Oil Based on QbD Principles. Improvement of Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV)-Based Technologies by Cell-Penetrating Penta-Peptides (CPP5s). Gelatin/Ascorbic Acid Scaffolds for Controlled Release of Allantoin: A Fully Natural Approach for Skin Tissue Regeneration Through Pro-Regenerative, Antimicrobial, and Keratinocyte-Supportive Properties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1