Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience.

Richard Garfinkle, Georgios M Kyriakopoulos, Brenda C Murphy, David W Larson, Sherief F Shawki, Amit Merchea, Nitin Mishra, Kellie L Mathis, William Perry, Kevin T Behm
{"title":"Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience.","authors":"Richard Garfinkle, Georgios M Kyriakopoulos, Brenda C Murphy, David W Larson, Sherief F Shawki, Amit Merchea, Nitin Mishra, Kellie L Mathis, William Perry, Kevin T Behm","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11634-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted beyond-TME surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adult (≥ 18 years old) patients who underwent a robotic-assisted proctectomy beyond-TME planes for primary or recurrent rectal cancer at three Mayo Clinic (USA) hospitals from 2017-2023 were included. Patient demographics and tumor and disease characteristics were obtained by review of the electronic health record. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and pathologic and oncologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 72 patients were included in the final cohort. Thirty-five (48.6%) patients underwent an extended resection without exenteration, while 22 (30.6%) underwent a multi-visceral en bloc exenteration; 20 (36.1%) patients underwent a lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, with or without a concomitant extended resection. Most cases had an advanced T-stage and an involved mesorectal fascia on pre-treatment MRI. The median operative time was 425.0 min (340.5-504.0) and the median estimated blood loss was 150.0 mL (75.0-277.5). Conversion to open surgery was needed in two (2.8%) cases. Nearly half the cohort (48.3%) experienced a postoperative complication and the median postoperative length of stay was 3.5 (3.0-7.0) days. Five cases had a positive margin, resulting in an R0 rate of 93.1%. None of the exenteration cases had a positive margin. After a median follow-up of 22.0 (13.0-45.7) months, 10 patients experienced a local recurrence (13.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted beyond-TME surgery can be performed safely with favorable postoperative clinical and oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11634-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted beyond-TME surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods: Consecutive adult (≥ 18 years old) patients who underwent a robotic-assisted proctectomy beyond-TME planes for primary or recurrent rectal cancer at three Mayo Clinic (USA) hospitals from 2017-2023 were included. Patient demographics and tumor and disease characteristics were obtained by review of the electronic health record. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and pathologic and oncologic outcomes.

Results: In total, 72 patients were included in the final cohort. Thirty-five (48.6%) patients underwent an extended resection without exenteration, while 22 (30.6%) underwent a multi-visceral en bloc exenteration; 20 (36.1%) patients underwent a lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, with or without a concomitant extended resection. Most cases had an advanced T-stage and an involved mesorectal fascia on pre-treatment MRI. The median operative time was 425.0 min (340.5-504.0) and the median estimated blood loss was 150.0 mL (75.0-277.5). Conversion to open surgery was needed in two (2.8%) cases. Nearly half the cohort (48.3%) experienced a postoperative complication and the median postoperative length of stay was 3.5 (3.0-7.0) days. Five cases had a positive margin, resulting in an R0 rate of 93.1%. None of the exenteration cases had a positive margin. After a median follow-up of 22.0 (13.0-45.7) months, 10 patients experienced a local recurrence (13.8%).

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted beyond-TME surgery can be performed safely with favorable postoperative clinical and oncologic outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Impact of surgical timing on postoperative quality of life in acute cholecystitis: a comparative analysis of early, intermediate, and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Meta-analysis of changes in skeletal muscle mass within 1 year after bariatric surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience. Commentary on "Multisociety research collaboration: timing of cholecystectomy following cholecystostomy drainage for acute cholecystitis". Comparison of primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a propensity score matching analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1