Tibial Tuberosity-Tibial Intercondylar Midpoint Distance Can Be Interchangeably Measured on Axial CT and MRI: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicina-Lithuania Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.3390/medicina61020348
Dinko Nizić, Marko Šimunović, Jure Serdar, Josip Vlaić, Mario Josipović, Ivan Levaj, Igor Ivić-Hofman, Mislav Jelić
{"title":"Tibial Tuberosity-Tibial Intercondylar Midpoint Distance Can Be Interchangeably Measured on Axial CT and MRI: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.","authors":"Dinko Nizić, Marko Šimunović, Jure Serdar, Josip Vlaić, Mario Josipović, Ivan Levaj, Igor Ivić-Hofman, Mislav Jelić","doi":"10.3390/medicina61020348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: It is unknown whether the tibial tuberosity-tibial intercondylar midpoint (TT-TIM) distance can be interchangeably measured on axial computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objective of this retrospective cross-sectional comparative study was to evaluate the intermethod agreement of the TT-TIM distance on axial CT and MRI and its bias towards tibial rotation (TR), age, sex, and body side. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: On axial CT and MRI of 15 consecutive knee pairs where each pair belonged to the same patient with no pathology affecting the tibial circumference and tibial tuberosity, TT-TIM distance and TR were measured by two blinded radiologists at 2-week intervals. Upon checking the symmetry of distributions (Shapiro-Wilk test), differences between matched knee pairs (Wilcoxon signed-rank test), intermethod (Bland-Altman plot) and interrater agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and correlations (Spearman rank correlation) were assessed. <i>Results</i>: The mean intermethod difference in TT-TIM distance was not statistically significant (-0.4 mm [-1.82, 0.96]; <i>p</i> = 0.52). The TT-TIM distance did not differ between knee pairs (<i>p</i> = 0.68), its interrater agreement was almost perfect (ICC > 0.81), and no bias towards TR (<i>p</i> > 0.66), age (<i>p</i> > 0.14), sex (<i>p</i> = 0.66), and body side (<i>p</i> > 0.37) was found. <i>Conclusions</i>: The TT-TIM distance can be interchangeably measured on axial CT and MRI with almost perfect interrater agreement, unbiased towards TR, age, sex, and body side.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: It is unknown whether the tibial tuberosity-tibial intercondylar midpoint (TT-TIM) distance can be interchangeably measured on axial computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objective of this retrospective cross-sectional comparative study was to evaluate the intermethod agreement of the TT-TIM distance on axial CT and MRI and its bias towards tibial rotation (TR), age, sex, and body side. Materials and Methods: On axial CT and MRI of 15 consecutive knee pairs where each pair belonged to the same patient with no pathology affecting the tibial circumference and tibial tuberosity, TT-TIM distance and TR were measured by two blinded radiologists at 2-week intervals. Upon checking the symmetry of distributions (Shapiro-Wilk test), differences between matched knee pairs (Wilcoxon signed-rank test), intermethod (Bland-Altman plot) and interrater agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and correlations (Spearman rank correlation) were assessed. Results: The mean intermethod difference in TT-TIM distance was not statistically significant (-0.4 mm [-1.82, 0.96]; p = 0.52). The TT-TIM distance did not differ between knee pairs (p = 0.68), its interrater agreement was almost perfect (ICC > 0.81), and no bias towards TR (p > 0.66), age (p > 0.14), sex (p = 0.66), and body side (p > 0.37) was found. Conclusions: The TT-TIM distance can be interchangeably measured on axial CT and MRI with almost perfect interrater agreement, unbiased towards TR, age, sex, and body side.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
期刊最新文献
Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging the Gap Between Mechanisms, Risk, and Therapy. Assessment of Pain, Diet, and Analgesic Use in Orthodontic Patients: An Observational Study. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Obesity Risk Prediction and Management: Approaches, Insights, and Recommendations. Can Clinical, Psychological, and Cognitive Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Help to Discriminate Women with Fibromyalgia from Those with Other Localized/Regional Pain Conditions? A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Diagnostic Criteria, Clinical Features, and Prognosis-A Focused Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1