A Pilot Study on the Effect of Added Sugar on Response Inhibition: Event-Related Potentials in a Go/NoGo Task.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicina-Lithuania Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.3390/medicina61020323
Karolina Jocbalyte, Rytis Stanikunas
{"title":"A Pilot Study on the Effect of Added Sugar on Response Inhibition: Event-Related Potentials in a Go/NoGo Task.","authors":"Karolina Jocbalyte, Rytis Stanikunas","doi":"10.3390/medicina61020323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Added sugar usage has become an important public health issue nowadays. Therefore, the interest in studying the cognitive and emotional effects associated with sugar consumption has increased. The present study aimed to investigate how the intake of added sugar affects participants' impulsivity and cognitive functions monitored during the performance of a computerized Go/NoGo task. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included 20 subjects (10 men and 10 women). Quantitative data for this study were collected via self-report questionnaires, including demographics, the Dietary Fat and Free Sugar-Short Questionnaire (DFS), the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS 2.0), and the Barratt impulsiveness scale-11 (BIS-11). <i>Results</i>: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were registered throughout this study. Comparing the results of psychophysiological and neuropsychological evaluations before and after the added sugar consumption reveals differences in ERPs. Specifically, the NoGo-P3 amplitude increased after the intake of added sugar. However, there were no behavioral differences between the two experimental sessions. <i>Conclusions</i>: Overall, the results of our study suggest that added sugar intake was associated with stronger neuronal firing in NoGo trials. One possible explanation for this could be the need for more cognitive endeavors for participants to successfully inhibit their response impulses after added sugar consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Added sugar usage has become an important public health issue nowadays. Therefore, the interest in studying the cognitive and emotional effects associated with sugar consumption has increased. The present study aimed to investigate how the intake of added sugar affects participants' impulsivity and cognitive functions monitored during the performance of a computerized Go/NoGo task. Materials and Methods: This study included 20 subjects (10 men and 10 women). Quantitative data for this study were collected via self-report questionnaires, including demographics, the Dietary Fat and Free Sugar-Short Questionnaire (DFS), the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS 2.0), and the Barratt impulsiveness scale-11 (BIS-11). Results: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were registered throughout this study. Comparing the results of psychophysiological and neuropsychological evaluations before and after the added sugar consumption reveals differences in ERPs. Specifically, the NoGo-P3 amplitude increased after the intake of added sugar. However, there were no behavioral differences between the two experimental sessions. Conclusions: Overall, the results of our study suggest that added sugar intake was associated with stronger neuronal firing in NoGo trials. One possible explanation for this could be the need for more cognitive endeavors for participants to successfully inhibit their response impulses after added sugar consumption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加糖对反应抑制影响的初步研究:Go/NoGo任务中的事件相关电位。
背景与目的:添加糖的使用已成为当今重要的公共卫生问题。因此,研究与糖摄入有关的认知和情绪影响的兴趣有所增加。本研究旨在调查添加糖的摄入如何影响参与者在计算机化Go/NoGo任务中监测的冲动和认知功能。材料与方法:本研究纳入20名受试者(男10名,女10名)。本研究通过人口统计学、膳食脂肪和游离糖-短问卷(DFS)、耶鲁食物成瘾量表(YFAS 2.0)和Barratt冲动量表-11 (BIS-11)等自述问卷收集定量数据。结果:在整个研究过程中记录了事件相关电位(ERPs)。比较添加糖摄入前后的心理生理和神经心理评估结果,揭示了erp的差异。其中,添加糖后NoGo-P3振幅增加。然而,两个实验阶段之间没有行为差异。结论:总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在NoGo试验中,添加糖的摄入与更强的神经元放电有关。一种可能的解释是,参与者需要更多的认知努力来成功地抑制他们在摄入添加糖后的反应冲动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
期刊最新文献
Hemodynamic Monitoring During Liver Transplantation for Patients on Perioperative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support: A Narrative Review. The Role of MDCT Coronary Angiography in the Detection of Benign Varieties and Anomalies of Coronary Blood Vessels-A Narrative Review. An Assessment of the Knowledge of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Polish Primary Care Physicians. Alterations in von Willebrand Factor Levels in Patients with Malaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Disease Severity. Use of Quadruple Therapy in the Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1