Adolescent Patient Perspectives on Family-Based Treatment: A Pilot Study

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS International Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/eat.24403
Catherine Gao, Catherine R. Drury, Simar Singh, Daniel Le Grange, Sasha Gorrell
{"title":"Adolescent Patient Perspectives on Family-Based Treatment: A Pilot Study","authors":"Catherine Gao,&nbsp;Catherine R. Drury,&nbsp;Simar Singh,&nbsp;Daniel Le Grange,&nbsp;Sasha Gorrell","doi":"10.1002/eat.24403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Family-based treatment (FBT) is the recommended first-line treatment for adolescent eating disorders (EDs), yet evidence suggests it is effective for only 50% of youth. Ambivalence about initiating treatment and/or recovery predicts treatment nonresponse for youth with other psychiatric disorders and may also contribute to poor FBT outcomes. Thus, understanding patient perspectives on FBT is essential to mitigating challenges to treatment acceptance, with great potential for improving treatment efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative, inductive approach was used to develop hypotheses about adolescents' perspectives on FBT and patient-perceived facilitators of ED recovery. Semi-structured interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory methodology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Interviewees (<i>N</i> = 10) expressed ambivalence toward FBT—particularly its use of parental empowerment and pragmatic focus on weight recovery. Many participants stated that FBT was effective, necessary for recovery, and improved relationships with caregivers; however, some reported that a perceived lack of agency and sidelining of psychosocial distress and family conflict negatively impacted their treatment engagement. Regarding ED recovery, participants reported a preference for cognitive/emotional aspects of recovery and framed recovery as an ongoing or lifelong process. Peer support was identified as an important facilitator of behavior change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings support addressing adolescent concerns (e.g., psychosocial well-being, agency, connection with peers, and family relationships) within the FBT framework. Results may inform future FBT implementation and adaptation and suggest the need for continued investigation of the treatment experience from multiple perspectives (i.e., patients, family members, and clinicians).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 5","pages":"890-902"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Family-based treatment (FBT) is the recommended first-line treatment for adolescent eating disorders (EDs), yet evidence suggests it is effective for only 50% of youth. Ambivalence about initiating treatment and/or recovery predicts treatment nonresponse for youth with other psychiatric disorders and may also contribute to poor FBT outcomes. Thus, understanding patient perspectives on FBT is essential to mitigating challenges to treatment acceptance, with great potential for improving treatment efficacy.

Methods

A qualitative, inductive approach was used to develop hypotheses about adolescents' perspectives on FBT and patient-perceived facilitators of ED recovery. Semi-structured interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory methodology.

Results

Interviewees (N = 10) expressed ambivalence toward FBT—particularly its use of parental empowerment and pragmatic focus on weight recovery. Many participants stated that FBT was effective, necessary for recovery, and improved relationships with caregivers; however, some reported that a perceived lack of agency and sidelining of psychosocial distress and family conflict negatively impacted their treatment engagement. Regarding ED recovery, participants reported a preference for cognitive/emotional aspects of recovery and framed recovery as an ongoing or lifelong process. Peer support was identified as an important facilitator of behavior change.

Discussion

Findings support addressing adolescent concerns (e.g., psychosocial well-being, agency, connection with peers, and family relationships) within the FBT framework. Results may inform future FBT implementation and adaptation and suggest the need for continued investigation of the treatment experience from multiple perspectives (i.e., patients, family members, and clinicians).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年患者对家庭治疗的看法:一项试点研究。
目的:以家庭为基础的治疗(FBT)是青少年饮食失调(EDs)推荐的一线治疗方法,但有证据表明,它仅对50%的青少年有效。对开始治疗和/或康复的矛盾心理预示着患有其他精神疾病的青少年治疗无反应,也可能导致不良的FBT结果。因此,了解患者对FBT的看法对于减轻对治疗接受度的挑战至关重要,具有提高治疗效果的巨大潜力。方法:采用定性、归纳的方法,对青少年对FBT的看法和患者认为的ED恢复的促进因素进行假设。采用扎根理论方法分析半结构化访谈数据。结果:受访者(N = 10)表达了对fbt的矛盾心理,特别是它使用父母授权和注重体重恢复的实用主义。许多参与者表示,FBT是有效的,是恢复和改善与照顾者关系的必要条件;然而,一些人报告说,缺乏代理和边缘化的心理社会困扰和家庭冲突对他们的治疗参与产生了负面影响。关于ED的恢复,参与者报告了对恢复的认知/情感方面的偏好,并将恢复视为一个持续或终身的过程。同伴支持被认为是行为改变的重要促进者。讨论:研究结果支持在FBT框架内解决青少年关注的问题(例如,心理社会健康、代理、与同龄人的联系和家庭关系)。结果可能为未来FBT的实施和适应提供信息,并提示需要从多个角度(即患者,家庭成员和临床医生)继续调查治疗经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
期刊最新文献
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Mobile App for Teens With or at High Risk for Eating Disorders: A Three-Arm Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Self-Help, Guided Self-Help, and Guided Self-Help With a Social Networking Component. Experiencing Extreme Hunger in Anorexia Nervosa Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis of Reddit Narratives. Developing Transdiagnostic Single-Session Interventions for University Students Experiencing Disordered Eating: A Mixed-Method Co-Design Study. Scrolling Toward Dissatisfaction? A Longitudinal Examination of Short-Form Video Use, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating Among Nurses. Disordered Eating Behaviors Among U.S. Children With Neuropsychiatric Conditions: A Nationally Representative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1