In-Hospital Mortality Predictors in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Using Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump.

Rossana Dall'Orto Elias, Isabella Pedrosa Assunção, Julliane Vasconcelos Joviano Santos, Maria da Gloria Rodrigues-Machado, José Luiz Barros Pena
{"title":"In-Hospital Mortality Predictors in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Using Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump.","authors":"Rossana Dall'Orto Elias, Isabella Pedrosa Assunção, Julliane Vasconcelos Joviano Santos, Maria da Gloria Rodrigues-Machado, José Luiz Barros Pena","doi":"10.36660/abc.20230496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have a high risk of death. New types of mechanical devices have limited availability in Brazil. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), although new guidelines downgraded its recommendation, is the most widely used mechanical support strategy. However, little is known about the clinical predictors of its effectiveness in reducing mortality in this group of patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the predictors of IABP effectiveness in reducing in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI and CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, retrospective, descriptive, single-center study involved 98 patients with STEMI and CS treated with IABP, in an intensive care unit. We compared patients who survived (42 men and 13 women) and those did not (30 men and 13 women) using clinical predictors of IABP effectiveness in reducing in-hospital death, considering a statistical significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of IABP in patients less than 1 day after infarction (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02 to 0.85; p = 0.034) was a factor that increased the risk of in-hospital death. Younger age (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.16; p = 0.010) and dyslipidemia (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.81; p = 0.024) were predictors of reduced in-hospital mortality. For each additional year of age, the risk of death increased 1.07-fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with STEMI and CS, the use of IABP reduced in-hospital mortality when it was used for 2 or more days, as well as in younger patients and those with dyslipidemia. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 2","pages":"e20230496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have a high risk of death. New types of mechanical devices have limited availability in Brazil. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), although new guidelines downgraded its recommendation, is the most widely used mechanical support strategy. However, little is known about the clinical predictors of its effectiveness in reducing mortality in this group of patients.

Objectives: To assess the predictors of IABP effectiveness in reducing in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI and CS.

Methods: This observational, retrospective, descriptive, single-center study involved 98 patients with STEMI and CS treated with IABP, in an intensive care unit. We compared patients who survived (42 men and 13 women) and those did not (30 men and 13 women) using clinical predictors of IABP effectiveness in reducing in-hospital death, considering a statistical significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).

Results: The use of IABP in patients less than 1 day after infarction (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02 to 0.85; p = 0.034) was a factor that increased the risk of in-hospital death. Younger age (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.16; p = 0.010) and dyslipidemia (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.81; p = 0.024) were predictors of reduced in-hospital mortality. For each additional year of age, the risk of death increased 1.07-fold.

Conclusion: In patients with STEMI and CS, the use of IABP reduced in-hospital mortality when it was used for 2 or more days, as well as in younger patients and those with dyslipidemia. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用主动脉内球囊反搏泵的急性心肌梗死和心源性休克患者的院内死亡率预测指标
背景:st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和心源性休克(CS)患者具有较高的死亡风险。新型机械设备在巴西的可用性有限。使用主动脉内球囊泵(IABP),虽然新指南降低了其推荐,是最广泛使用的机械支持策略。然而,对其在降低这组患者死亡率方面的有效性的临床预测知之甚少。目的:评估IABP在降低STEMI和CS患者住院死亡率方面有效性的预测因素。方法:这项观察性、回顾性、描述性、单中心研究纳入了重症监护室接受IABP治疗的98例STEMI和CS患者。我们使用IABP降低院内死亡有效性的临床预测指标对存活患者(42名男性和13名女性)和未存活患者(30名男性和13名女性)进行比较,考虑统计学显著性水平为5% (p < 0.05)。结果:梗死后不到1天的患者使用IABP(优势比[OR]: 0.12;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.02 ~ 0.85;P = 0.034)是增加院内死亡风险的因素。年龄较小(OR: 1.09;95% CI: 1.02 ~ 1.16;p = 0.010)和血脂异常(OR: 0.19;95% CI: 0.05 ~ 0.81;P = 0.024)是降低住院死亡率的预测因子。年龄每增加一岁,死亡风险增加1.07倍。结论:在STEMI和CS患者中,使用IABP在使用2天或更长时间时,以及在年轻患者和血脂异常患者中,可降低住院死亡率。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Hidden Cost of Denied Access: Advanced Heart Failure in Latin America. Reversal of Left Bundle Branch Block Following Treatment in Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy. Alcohol Consumption and Its Association with Lifestyle in Individuals with and without Cardiovascular Disease. Small-Vessel Coronary Disease and Drug-Coated Balloons: Time to Reconsider Our Strategy? Testosterone, SHBG Levels, and Heart Failure Risk: Does the Correlation Imply Causation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1