Endoscope reprocessing—resource consumption and emissions

IF 25.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gut Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-334457
Carlotta Crisciotti, Alessandro Fugazza, Maddalena Menini, Spadaccini Marco, Elena Vanni, Alberto Fumagalli, Paolo Oliva, Tommy Rizkala, Cesare Hassan, Serena Giordano, Rosaria Iacovino, Alessandro Repici
{"title":"Endoscope reprocessing—resource consumption and emissions","authors":"Carlotta Crisciotti, Alessandro Fugazza, Maddalena Menini, Spadaccini Marco, Elena Vanni, Alberto Fumagalli, Paolo Oliva, Tommy Rizkala, Cesare Hassan, Serena Giordano, Rosaria Iacovino, Alessandro Repici","doi":"10.1136/gutjnl-2024-334457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective reprocessing of reusable GI endoscopes is crucial to minimising patient risks associated with contamination. However, this process poses a considerable environmental challenge. This study aimed to examine the emissions associated with endoscope disinfection, a largely unexplored area. On average, a reprocessing cycle required 57 L water, 65 L air, 1080 watts of electricity and produced 3.30 kgCO2e. These findings highlight the pressing need for sustainable solutions to reduce the environmental impact of endoscope reprocessing while ensuring patient safety remains uncompromised. GI endoscopy represents a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and hazardous waste in healthcare.1–3 Several gastroenterology associations have issued guidelines and standards for proper endoscope reprocessing to ensure patient safety and prevent health risks.4 5 Digestive endoscopes are included in the ‘semicritical’ category of items as they contact mucous membranes, thus, the need for high-level disinfection, which, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), is defined as the ‘complete elimination of all microorganisms in or on an instrument, except for small numbers of bacterial spores’. This is achieved using high-level disinfectants, peracetic acid being the one used by the unit. However, the impact of this essential process remains largely unknown. Recently, Pioche et al 6 highlighted that—in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of gastroscopes—the decontamination stage of reusable gastroscopes was the greatest contributor to GHG emissions accounting for more than 90% of water consumption and 45% of carbon footprint. The goal of this study is to quantify the environmental burden of reusable endoscope reprocessing, …","PeriodicalId":12825,"journal":{"name":"Gut","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-334457","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective reprocessing of reusable GI endoscopes is crucial to minimising patient risks associated with contamination. However, this process poses a considerable environmental challenge. This study aimed to examine the emissions associated with endoscope disinfection, a largely unexplored area. On average, a reprocessing cycle required 57 L water, 65 L air, 1080 watts of electricity and produced 3.30 kgCO2e. These findings highlight the pressing need for sustainable solutions to reduce the environmental impact of endoscope reprocessing while ensuring patient safety remains uncompromised. GI endoscopy represents a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and hazardous waste in healthcare.1–3 Several gastroenterology associations have issued guidelines and standards for proper endoscope reprocessing to ensure patient safety and prevent health risks.4 5 Digestive endoscopes are included in the ‘semicritical’ category of items as they contact mucous membranes, thus, the need for high-level disinfection, which, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), is defined as the ‘complete elimination of all microorganisms in or on an instrument, except for small numbers of bacterial spores’. This is achieved using high-level disinfectants, peracetic acid being the one used by the unit. However, the impact of this essential process remains largely unknown. Recently, Pioche et al 6 highlighted that—in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of gastroscopes—the decontamination stage of reusable gastroscopes was the greatest contributor to GHG emissions accounting for more than 90% of water consumption and 45% of carbon footprint. The goal of this study is to quantify the environmental burden of reusable endoscope reprocessing, …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜后处理-资源消耗和排放
对可重复使用的胃肠道内窥镜进行有效的再处理对于最大限度地减少患者与污染相关的风险至关重要。然而,这一过程带来了相当大的环境挑战。这项研究旨在检查与内窥镜消毒有关的排放,这是一个很大程度上未开发的领域。平均而言,一个再处理循环需要57升水、65升空气、1080瓦电力,产生3.30千克二氧化碳当量。这些发现强调了迫切需要可持续的解决方案,以减少内窥镜再加工对环境的影响,同时确保患者的安全不受损害。胃肠道内窥镜检查是医疗保健领域温室气体(GHG)排放和危险废物的重要来源。1-3一些胃肠病学协会已经发布了内镜正确再处理的指南和标准,以确保患者安全和预防健康风险。消化内窥镜由于与粘膜接触而被列入“半临界”类别,因此需要进行高水平消毒,根据疾病控制中心(CDC)的定义,这是“完全消除仪器内或仪器上的所有微生物,除了少量细菌孢子”。这是通过使用高级消毒剂实现的,过氧乙酸是该装置使用的消毒剂。然而,这一重要过程的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。最近,Pioche等6强调,在胃镜的生命周期评估(LCA)中,可重复使用胃镜的净化阶段是温室气体排放的最大贡献者,占用水量的90%以上,占碳足迹的45%。本研究的目的是量化可重复使用内窥镜再处理的环境负担,…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gut
Gut 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
284
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Gut is a renowned international journal specializing in gastroenterology and hepatology, known for its high-quality clinical research covering the alimentary tract, liver, biliary tree, and pancreas. It offers authoritative and current coverage across all aspects of gastroenterology and hepatology, featuring articles on emerging disease mechanisms and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches authored by leading experts. As the flagship journal of BMJ's gastroenterology portfolio, Gut is accompanied by two companion journals: Frontline Gastroenterology, focusing on education and practice-oriented papers, and BMJ Open Gastroenterology for open access original research.
期刊最新文献
Circulating extracellular vesicle long RNA profiling combined with machine learning unveils novel diagnostic signature and molecular features in chronic pancreatitis. Loss of sinusoidal endothelial identity: RAP1A at the crossroads of capillarisation and liver fibrosis. Targeting PKM2-dependent glycolysis reprogrammes monocytes into Cadm1+ macrophages to promote mucosal repair and attenuate colitis progression. CD16+ γδ T cells mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and associate with viral control in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Percutaneous needle decompression for endoscopic iatrogenic pneumoperitoneum: assessment of safety and efficacy in real world practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1