A scoping review of ethical aspects of public-private partnerships in digital health

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01515-3
Marieke A. R. Bak, Daan Horbach, Alena Buyx, Stuart McLennan
{"title":"A scoping review of ethical aspects of public-private partnerships in digital health","authors":"Marieke A. R. Bak, Daan Horbach, Alena Buyx, Stuart McLennan","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01515-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Partnerships between public and private organizations in digital health can promote more accessible, affordable, and high-quality care, but they also raise ethical and governance challenges. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, identifying 46 studies examining ethical aspects of digital health public-private partnerships (PPPs). Three key themes emerged: data privacy and consent, ensuring public benefit and access, and good governance and demonstrating trustworthiness. We provide recommendations for each theme. To foster responsible innovation, we conclude that early and contextual operationalisation of ethics guidelines in PPPs is necessary to balance respect for fundamental values with the pursuit of impactful innovation. If PPPs become more successful as a result, this contributes to reducing the research waste of failed collaborations. Further research should clarify the scope of PPPs and definition of ‘public benefit’, and we call for critical study on the ‘economization’ of digital health promoted by public and private sector organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"46 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01515-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partnerships between public and private organizations in digital health can promote more accessible, affordable, and high-quality care, but they also raise ethical and governance challenges. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, identifying 46 studies examining ethical aspects of digital health public-private partnerships (PPPs). Three key themes emerged: data privacy and consent, ensuring public benefit and access, and good governance and demonstrating trustworthiness. We provide recommendations for each theme. To foster responsible innovation, we conclude that early and contextual operationalisation of ethics guidelines in PPPs is necessary to balance respect for fundamental values with the pursuit of impactful innovation. If PPPs become more successful as a result, this contributes to reducing the research waste of failed collaborations. Further research should clarify the scope of PPPs and definition of ‘public benefit’, and we call for critical study on the ‘economization’ of digital health promoted by public and private sector organizations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对数字卫生领域公私伙伴关系伦理方面的范围审查
公共和私营组织在数字医疗领域的合作可以促进更容易获得、负担得起和高质量的医疗服务,但也会带来道德和治理方面的挑战。我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science,确定了46项关于数字卫生公私伙伴关系(ppp)伦理方面的研究。出现了三个关键主题:数据隐私和同意、确保公共利益和访问、良好治理和展示可信度。我们为每个主题提供建议。为了促进负责任的创新,我们得出结论,在公私合作伙伴关系中尽早实施道德准则是必要的,以便在尊重基本价值观与追求有影响力的创新之间取得平衡。如果公私伙伴关系因此变得更加成功,这将有助于减少失败合作造成的研究浪费。进一步的研究应该澄清公私伙伴关系的范围和“公共利益”的定义,我们呼吁对公共和私营部门组织推动的数字卫生的“经济化”进行批判性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Key concept learning for medical vision language model with reasoning capabilities. Reinforcement learning based automated anesthesia system for gastrointestinal endoscopy with a multicenter randomized trial. Explainable machine learning differentiates necrotizing fasciitis and osteomyelitis via routine blood biomarkers. External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction. Diagnostic accuracy of digital clock drawing test for Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1