Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI

Yanni He , Wenhong Yi , Chenqian Guo , Wenjun Li , Changpeng Xu , Jialin Ye , Sushu Li , Meijun Zhou , Tong Bai , Tong Wang , Lixian Liu , Ning Zhang , Yu Wang , Jingjiao Xu , Hongmei Liu
{"title":"Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI","authors":"Yanni He ,&nbsp;Wenhong Yi ,&nbsp;Chenqian Guo ,&nbsp;Wenjun Li ,&nbsp;Changpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Jialin Ye ,&nbsp;Sushu Li ,&nbsp;Meijun Zhou ,&nbsp;Tong Bai ,&nbsp;Tong Wang ,&nbsp;Lixian Liu ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjiao Xu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2025.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for ankle ligament injuries, and evaluate ankle injury using the combination of US and X-ray.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on 1419 participants presenting with ankle injury at hospital between July 2020 and March 2022. 1153 patients included after exclusion underwent US imaging, while 584 patients were also diagnosed by X-ray and 78 accepted MRI. The diagnostic abilities of MRI and US for ankle ligamentous injuries (anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), medial deltoid ligament (MDL)) were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The diagnostic performance of US for ligamentous tear was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value, with MRI as the reference standard. The detection rates of X-ray imaging, US imaging, and their combination were compared by Kendall's W test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study population included 558 males and 595 females with a mean age of 30 ± 13 years. There were no significant differences on the grade of ligament injury detected by US and MRI (P <sub>AITFL</sub> = 0.52, P <sub>ATFL</sub> = 0.15, P <sub>CAL</sub> = 0.061, P <sub>MDL</sub> = 0.26). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and AUC of US imaging for ligamentous tear were 50.0 %, 88.9 % and 0.69 in AITFL, 92.7 %, 60.9 % and 0.77 in ATFL, 90.9 %, 86.6 % and 0.89 in CFL, 66.7 %, 96.0 % and 0.81 in MDL respectively. The detection rate of bone fracture increased significantly after combining US and X-ray imaging (R <sub>US &amp; x-ray</sub> = 42.6 %, R <sub>US</sub> = 36.5 %, R <sub>x-ray</sub> = 26.5 %, P &lt; 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>US imaging showed similar diagnostic performance for AITFL, ATFL, CFL and MDL injury as MRI. The combination of US and X-ray imaging can be a useful complementary tool for primary evaluation of ankle injuries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668325000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for ankle ligament injuries, and evaluate ankle injury using the combination of US and X-ray.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 1419 participants presenting with ankle injury at hospital between July 2020 and March 2022. 1153 patients included after exclusion underwent US imaging, while 584 patients were also diagnosed by X-ray and 78 accepted MRI. The diagnostic abilities of MRI and US for ankle ligamentous injuries (anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), medial deltoid ligament (MDL)) were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The diagnostic performance of US for ligamentous tear was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value, with MRI as the reference standard. The detection rates of X-ray imaging, US imaging, and their combination were compared by Kendall's W test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

The study population included 558 males and 595 females with a mean age of 30 ± 13 years. There were no significant differences on the grade of ligament injury detected by US and MRI (P AITFL = 0.52, P ATFL = 0.15, P CAL = 0.061, P MDL = 0.26). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and AUC of US imaging for ligamentous tear were 50.0 %, 88.9 % and 0.69 in AITFL, 92.7 %, 60.9 % and 0.77 in ATFL, 90.9 %, 86.6 % and 0.89 in CFL, 66.7 %, 96.0 % and 0.81 in MDL respectively. The detection rate of bone fracture increased significantly after combining US and X-ray imaging (R US & x-ray = 42.6 %, R US = 36.5 %, R x-ray = 26.5 %, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

US imaging showed similar diagnostic performance for AITFL, ATFL, CFL and MDL injury as MRI. The combination of US and X-ray imaging can be a useful complementary tool for primary evaluation of ankle injuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI Treatment of inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with focused ultrasound and microbubbles in patients receiving chemotherapy Breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation using improved 3DUnet++ Utilization of evoked vibrational signatures under ultrasound examination as a novel method of tissue classification Protocol refinement and inter- and intra-rater reliability assessment of ultrasound-based measurements of hamstring architecture, and echo intensity, and intra-rater reliability of shear wave elastography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1