GENE EXPRESSION DIFFERENCES AND PATHWAY ACTIVATION BY RACE IN ERG+ PROSTATE CANCERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EQUITABLE CANCER CARE

Matthew W. Cole, Keavash Assani, Bryn Launer, Hunter Robinson, Avi Baskin, Nikita Bastin, Matthew Shou, Derick Zhang, Janene Pierce, Jeffrey Tosoian
{"title":"GENE EXPRESSION DIFFERENCES AND PATHWAY ACTIVATION BY RACE IN ERG+ PROSTATE CANCERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EQUITABLE CANCER CARE","authors":"Matthew W. Cole,&nbsp;Keavash Assani,&nbsp;Bryn Launer,&nbsp;Hunter Robinson,&nbsp;Avi Baskin,&nbsp;Nikita Bastin,&nbsp;Matthew Shou,&nbsp;Derick Zhang,&nbsp;Janene Pierce,&nbsp;Jeffrey Tosoian","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>A large body of evidence has demonstrated increased prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality in African-American (AA) men relative to White men. While outcome disparities are strongly influenced by social determinants of health, established differences in molecular tumor biology between AA and White men have implications across the spectrum of prostate cancer care, including early diagnostic testing and targeted therapeutics. Expression of the <em>ERG</em> gene (ERG+) is an early molecular alteration in one-half of prostate cancers. Additionally, ERG+ is found to be two-fold more prevalent in White men compared to AA men. However, downstream molecular differences by race remain poorly understood. In a diverse cohort of men with ERG+ prostate cancer, we sought to assess differential expression of PCa-associated genes and identify specific biologic pathways implicated in AA PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the publicly available GSE169038 dataset, we analyzed Decipher whole-transcriptome expression profiles (22,236 transcripts) in 1079 men with clinically significant PCa (Grade Group ≥ 2) who underwent radical prostatectomy. Tumors were designated as either ERG+ or ERG- via Gaussian Mixture Modeling, and differentially expressed genes were identified among sample groups using the linear models for microarray data (<em>Limma</em>) package with a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 5%. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed on differentially expressed genes using the EnrichR web-based tool with an FDR threshold of 10%. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The microarray analysis included 522 White and 557 AA men. Overall, 40% (n=209) of White patients were classified as ERG+, as compared to 23% (n=127) of AA patients (p&lt;0.001). A total of 5814 genes were differentially expressed in ERG+ tumors relative to ERG- tumors. Of these, 2605 (45%) genes were differentially expressed in both White and AA patients. Additionally, 1987 (34%) genes were differentially expressed in only White patients, and 1312 (23%) were differentially expressed in only AA patients. Enrichment signatures in the genes that were differentially expressed in both White and AA patients demonstrated significant associations with pathways related to androgen and estrogen response, fatty acid metabolism, and apoptosis (q&lt;0.05 for all). In addition to the above shared pathways, genes differentially expressed only in White patients were associated with the p53 (q=0.04), while genes differentially expressed solely in AA patients were associated with the E2F Target pathway (q=0.07).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our analysis revealed distinct genetic profiles between White and AA patients within the ERG+ PCa molecular subtype. As previously described, we found ERG upregulation was associated with dysregulation of the androgen receptor pathway in both White and AA patients. However, we additionally identified race-specific disruptions to the E2F-RB in AA and p53 cell cycle regulation axis. As molecular testing continues to emerge as a standard component of cancer detection and treatment selection, a clear understanding of race-associated tumor differences will be necessary to ensure equitable care across racially diverse settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 5-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924007956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A large body of evidence has demonstrated increased prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality in African-American (AA) men relative to White men. While outcome disparities are strongly influenced by social determinants of health, established differences in molecular tumor biology between AA and White men have implications across the spectrum of prostate cancer care, including early diagnostic testing and targeted therapeutics. Expression of the ERG gene (ERG+) is an early molecular alteration in one-half of prostate cancers. Additionally, ERG+ is found to be two-fold more prevalent in White men compared to AA men. However, downstream molecular differences by race remain poorly understood. In a diverse cohort of men with ERG+ prostate cancer, we sought to assess differential expression of PCa-associated genes and identify specific biologic pathways implicated in AA PCa.

Methods

Using the publicly available GSE169038 dataset, we analyzed Decipher whole-transcriptome expression profiles (22,236 transcripts) in 1079 men with clinically significant PCa (Grade Group ≥ 2) who underwent radical prostatectomy. Tumors were designated as either ERG+ or ERG- via Gaussian Mixture Modeling, and differentially expressed genes were identified among sample groups using the linear models for microarray data (Limma) package with a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 5%. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed on differentially expressed genes using the EnrichR web-based tool with an FDR threshold of 10%. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

Results

The microarray analysis included 522 White and 557 AA men. Overall, 40% (n=209) of White patients were classified as ERG+, as compared to 23% (n=127) of AA patients (p<0.001). A total of 5814 genes were differentially expressed in ERG+ tumors relative to ERG- tumors. Of these, 2605 (45%) genes were differentially expressed in both White and AA patients. Additionally, 1987 (34%) genes were differentially expressed in only White patients, and 1312 (23%) were differentially expressed in only AA patients. Enrichment signatures in the genes that were differentially expressed in both White and AA patients demonstrated significant associations with pathways related to androgen and estrogen response, fatty acid metabolism, and apoptosis (q<0.05 for all). In addition to the above shared pathways, genes differentially expressed only in White patients were associated with the p53 (q=0.04), while genes differentially expressed solely in AA patients were associated with the E2F Target pathway (q=0.07).

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed distinct genetic profiles between White and AA patients within the ERG+ PCa molecular subtype. As previously described, we found ERG upregulation was associated with dysregulation of the androgen receptor pathway in both White and AA patients. However, we additionally identified race-specific disruptions to the E2F-RB in AA and p53 cell cycle regulation axis. As molecular testing continues to emerge as a standard component of cancer detection and treatment selection, a clear understanding of race-associated tumor differences will be necessary to ensure equitable care across racially diverse settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
erg +前列腺癌的基因表达差异和途径激活:对公平的癌症治疗的影响
大量证据表明,相对于白人男性,非裔美国人(AA)男性的前列腺癌(PCa)发病率和死亡率更高。虽然结果差异受到健康的社会决定因素的强烈影响,但AA和白人男性之间在分子肿瘤生物学上的既定差异对前列腺癌治疗的各个方面都有影响,包括早期诊断测试和靶向治疗。ERG基因(ERG+)的表达是一半前列腺癌的早期分子改变。此外,ERG+在白人男性中的患病率是AA男性的两倍。然而,不同种族的下游分子差异仍然知之甚少。在一个不同的ERG+前列腺癌男性队列中,我们试图评估PCa相关基因的差异表达,并确定与AA型PCa相关的特定生物学途径。方法使用公开的GSE169038数据集,我们分析了1079名接受根治性前列腺切除术的临床显著性PCa (Grade Group≥2)患者的破译全转录组表达谱(22,236个转录本)。通过高斯混合建模将肿瘤指定为ERG+或ERG-,并使用微阵列数据(Limma)包装的线性模型识别样本组之间的差异表达基因,错误发现率(FDR)阈值为5%。使用基于web的富集工具对差异表达基因进行基因集富集分析(GSEA), FDR阈值为10%。采用Benjamini-Hochberg方法对多重比较进行校正。结果共纳入白人522例,AA 557例。总体而言,40% (n=209)的白人患者被归类为ERG+,而23% (n=127)的AA患者被归类为ERG+ (p<0.001)。与ERG-肿瘤相比,ERG+肿瘤中共有5814个基因存在差异表达。其中,2605个(45%)基因在White和AA患者中均有差异表达。此外,1987个(34%)基因仅在白人患者中差异表达,1312个(23%)基因仅在AA患者中差异表达。在White和AA患者中差异表达的基因富集特征显示与雄激素和雌激素反应、脂肪酸代谢和细胞凋亡相关的通路有显著关联(均为0.05)。除上述共享通路外,仅在White患者中差异表达的基因与p53相关(q=0.04), AA患者中差异表达的基因与E2F Target通路相关(q=0.07)。结论sour分析显示,在ERG+ PCa分子亚型中,White和AA患者具有明显的遗传特征。如前所述,我们发现在White和AA患者中,ERG上调与雄激素受体通路失调有关。然而,我们还发现了AA和p53细胞周期调控轴上E2F-RB的种族特异性破坏。随着分子检测不断成为癌症检测和治疗选择的标准组成部分,对种族相关肿瘤差异的清晰理解将是确保在不同种族环境下公平护理的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Etiology of testosterone deficiency after radical prostatectomy. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of extirpative surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer in octogenarians. Prostate cancer deaths in 2050-quo vadimus? Re: Beyond tunnel vision-Reconsidering real-world evidence on staging in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Artificial intelligence-driven prostate cancer diagnosis: Enhancing accuracy and personalizing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1