Microcirculation properties of 20 % albumin in sepsis; a randomised controlled trial

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155039
Rachael A.F. Cusack , Alejandro Rodríguez , Ben Cantan , Alexis Garduno , Elizabeth Connolly , Gabor Zilahi , John Davis Coakley , Ignacio Martin-Loeches
{"title":"Microcirculation properties of 20 % albumin in sepsis; a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Rachael A.F. Cusack ,&nbsp;Alejandro Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Ben Cantan ,&nbsp;Alexis Garduno ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Connolly ,&nbsp;Gabor Zilahi ,&nbsp;John Davis Coakley ,&nbsp;Ignacio Martin-Loeches","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sepsis and septic shock are associated with microcirculatory dysfunction, significantly impacting patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 20 % albumin bolus on microcirculation compared to crystalloid resuscitation in fluid-responsive patients <em>(</em><span><span><em>ClinicalTrials.gov</em></span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <em>ID:</em> <span><span><em>NCT05357339</em></span><svg><path></path></svg></span><em>).</em></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-centre randomised controlled trial, enrolling 103 patients (Albumin <em>n</em> = 52, Control <em>n</em> = 51). Fluid responsiveness was assessed, and fluid was administered in boluses of 100 ml to clinical effect. Microcirculation was measured using the Side stream Dark Field camera and AVA 4.3 software. Baseline characteristics, macrohaemodynamics, and microcirculation parameters were recorded. Three patients were excluded from analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort comprised 100 patients, 35 (35 %) females with a mean age of 58 years (range: 18–86). The mean APACHE score was 28 (range: 7–45), and the mean SOFA score was 9.4 (range: 1–17). No significant differences in APACHE (26.24 vs. 29.4, <em>p</em> = 0.069) or SOFA (9.08 vs. 9.78, <em>p</em> = 0.32) scores were found for albumin and control group respectively. The albumin group had worse microcirculation at baseline but demonstrated significant improvements in microvascular density and activity at 15 min and 60 min (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.005), while the control group exhibited no significant changes. Additionally, both groups were fluid responsive, with a mean pulse pressure variability of 17 % at admission. There were no significant differences in overall fluid balances, vasopressor days, length of ICU stay, or mortality between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates that a 20 % albumin bolus significantly enhances microcirculation in fluid-responsive patients with septic shock. These findings underscore the potential benefits of targeted microcirculation therapy in critically ill patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 155039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sepsis and septic shock are associated with microcirculatory dysfunction, significantly impacting patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 20 % albumin bolus on microcirculation compared to crystalloid resuscitation in fluid-responsive patients (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05357339).

Methods

We conducted a single-centre randomised controlled trial, enrolling 103 patients (Albumin n = 52, Control n = 51). Fluid responsiveness was assessed, and fluid was administered in boluses of 100 ml to clinical effect. Microcirculation was measured using the Side stream Dark Field camera and AVA 4.3 software. Baseline characteristics, macrohaemodynamics, and microcirculation parameters were recorded. Three patients were excluded from analysis.

Results

The final cohort comprised 100 patients, 35 (35 %) females with a mean age of 58 years (range: 18–86). The mean APACHE score was 28 (range: 7–45), and the mean SOFA score was 9.4 (range: 1–17). No significant differences in APACHE (26.24 vs. 29.4, p = 0.069) or SOFA (9.08 vs. 9.78, p = 0.32) scores were found for albumin and control group respectively. The albumin group had worse microcirculation at baseline but demonstrated significant improvements in microvascular density and activity at 15 min and 60 min (p < 0.005), while the control group exhibited no significant changes. Additionally, both groups were fluid responsive, with a mean pulse pressure variability of 17 % at admission. There were no significant differences in overall fluid balances, vasopressor days, length of ICU stay, or mortality between groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a 20 % albumin bolus significantly enhances microcirculation in fluid-responsive patients with septic shock. These findings underscore the potential benefits of targeted microcirculation therapy in critically ill patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20%白蛋白在脓毒症中的微循环特性一项随机对照试验
脓毒症和感染性休克与微循环功能障碍相关,显著影响患者预后。本研究旨在评估20%白蛋白丸对液体反应性患者微循环的影响,与晶体复苏相比(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05357339)。方法采用单中心随机对照试验,纳入103例患者(白蛋白组52例,对照组51例)。评估液体反应性,并给予100毫升的液体以观察临床效果。微循环测量采用侧流暗场相机和AVA 4.3软件。记录基线特征、大血流动力学和微循环参数。3例患者被排除在分析之外。结果最终队列包括100例患者,其中35例(35%)为女性,平均年龄58岁(范围:18-86岁)。APACHE平均评分为28分(范围:7-45),SOFA平均评分为9.4分(范围:1-17)。白蛋白组和对照组的APACHE评分(26.24比29.4,p = 0.069)和SOFA评分(9.08比9.78,p = 0.32)无显著差异。白蛋白组在基线时微循环较差,但在15分钟和60分钟时微血管密度和活动显著改善(p <;0.005),而对照组无显著变化。此外,两组患者均有流体反应,入院时平均脉压变异性为17%。两组患者在总体体液平衡、血管加压天数、ICU住院时间或死亡率方面均无显著差异。结论:20%白蛋白可显著改善脓毒性休克患者的微循环。这些发现强调了靶向微循环治疗在危重患者中的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
Early hemodynamic phenotyping in sepsis using transthoracic echocardiography: A proof-of-concept study in a north African ICU Green intensive care in an upper-middle-income country: A national survey of awareness, practices and barriers among ICU physicians in Turkey The “gray zone” of intensive care: ICU admission beyond a binary decision Discontinuation of continuous kidney replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury: A pilot study Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: 2025
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1