Assessing micro-mobility net benefits at the individual level: Evidence for two European countries

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.020
Nelson Daniel, Frederico Cruz-Jesus, Carlos Tam
{"title":"Assessing micro-mobility net benefits at the individual level: Evidence for two European countries","authors":"Nelson Daniel,&nbsp;Frederico Cruz-Jesus,&nbsp;Carlos Tam","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study, comparing two European countries, explores the net benefits of e-scooters in interplay with their usage and user satisfaction. We surveyed 199 e-scooter users in Germany and 184 in Portugal. A novel framework based on an established model used to evaluate information systems’ success is introduced, where net benefits, here, are ultimately expressed by the efficiency and effectiveness of e-scooters in undertaking short-distance trips. All in all, one can infer that pragmatic reasons, in terms of functionality and fulfillment of purpose, are the most important factors in the usage and satisfaction of e-scooters. Recreational reasons are, at most, a side effect. The number one explanation of e-scooter net benefits, conducting short-distance trips effectively and efficiently, is user satisfaction, which is reinforced by use. Price also plays a rather important role, while thoughts regarding sustainability and safety do matter but subordinately. Preponderantly, the countries’ subsamples align with the full-sample model’s findings, with some differences among them; nonetheless, no significant one can be found. All in all, both countries share comparable individual-level behaviors regarding e-scooters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 95-111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study, comparing two European countries, explores the net benefits of e-scooters in interplay with their usage and user satisfaction. We surveyed 199 e-scooter users in Germany and 184 in Portugal. A novel framework based on an established model used to evaluate information systems’ success is introduced, where net benefits, here, are ultimately expressed by the efficiency and effectiveness of e-scooters in undertaking short-distance trips. All in all, one can infer that pragmatic reasons, in terms of functionality and fulfillment of purpose, are the most important factors in the usage and satisfaction of e-scooters. Recreational reasons are, at most, a side effect. The number one explanation of e-scooter net benefits, conducting short-distance trips effectively and efficiently, is user satisfaction, which is reinforced by use. Price also plays a rather important role, while thoughts regarding sustainability and safety do matter but subordinately. Preponderantly, the countries’ subsamples align with the full-sample model’s findings, with some differences among them; nonetheless, no significant one can be found. All in all, both countries share comparable individual-level behaviors regarding e-scooters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the cognitive and behavioral factors impacting novice young drivers: Structural equation modeling of situational awareness, driving skills, reported crash history, and violations, using a driving simulator Editorial Board Finding windows of opportunity: How drivers adapt to partial automation safeguards over time Measuring sensation seeking in urban cyclists: Development and validation of the SSC scale Predictors of cyclists’ and pedestrians’ behavior in interactions with turning (Automated) vehicles − Insights from a Wizard-of-Oz study in real traffic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1