Clinical and medico-economic benefits of remote monitoring of chronic wounds

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY International Wound Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1111/iwj.70140
Guillaume Maxant, Madalina Pastrav, Ioan Gogeneata, Carine Bajcz, Anne-Claire Bertaux
{"title":"Clinical and medico-economic benefits of remote monitoring of chronic wounds","authors":"Guillaume Maxant,&nbsp;Madalina Pastrav,&nbsp;Ioan Gogeneata,&nbsp;Carine Bajcz,&nbsp;Anne-Claire Bertaux","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Through a prospective comparative intention-to-treat study, we studied the impact of remote monitoring of chronic wounds on safety and on the consumption of healthcare system resources. From January to June 2023, 103 consecutive patients were managed according to conventional follow-up (group CF, 61 patients) or to follow-up in which remote wound monitoring (group RM, 42 patients) could be used. Data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, analysing data on treatment safety (mortality, major amputation, wound healing, use of emergency services), clinical results (closure and time to closure of the wound) organisational effectiveness (consultation, hospitalisation, use of unscheduled care), and estimated cost. The use of telemonitoring did not alter the safety criteria for the management of chronic wounds. It allowed a 35 days reduction of the time to wound-closure (<i>p</i> = 0.05). It led to a 55% reduction in hospital consultations (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). These factors have resulted in an estimated reduction in the cost of care of 1666 euros. The constated reduction in unscheduled care (visit of emergency services, emergency hospitalisation) was not significant. Remote monitoring of chronic wounds is safe, and clinically efficient (reduced healing time), compared to conventional monitoring. It decreases the need for in-hospital consultations and the overall cost of the treatment and thus may ease the access to specialised care in wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through a prospective comparative intention-to-treat study, we studied the impact of remote monitoring of chronic wounds on safety and on the consumption of healthcare system resources. From January to June 2023, 103 consecutive patients were managed according to conventional follow-up (group CF, 61 patients) or to follow-up in which remote wound monitoring (group RM, 42 patients) could be used. Data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, analysing data on treatment safety (mortality, major amputation, wound healing, use of emergency services), clinical results (closure and time to closure of the wound) organisational effectiveness (consultation, hospitalisation, use of unscheduled care), and estimated cost. The use of telemonitoring did not alter the safety criteria for the management of chronic wounds. It allowed a 35 days reduction of the time to wound-closure (p = 0.05). It led to a 55% reduction in hospital consultations (p ≤ 0.01). These factors have resulted in an estimated reduction in the cost of care of 1666 euros. The constated reduction in unscheduled care (visit of emergency services, emergency hospitalisation) was not significant. Remote monitoring of chronic wounds is safe, and clinically efficient (reduced healing time), compared to conventional monitoring. It decreases the need for in-hospital consultations and the overall cost of the treatment and thus may ease the access to specialised care in wound healing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性伤口远程监测的临床和医学经济效益
通过一项前瞻性比较意向治疗研究,我们研究了远程监测慢性伤口对安全性和医疗系统资源消耗的影响。2023年1 - 6月,对103例患者进行常规随访(CF组,61例)或远程伤口监测随访(RM组,42例)。前瞻性地收集资料。在意向治疗的基础上进行了统计分析,分析了治疗安全性(死亡率、主要截肢、伤口愈合、紧急服务的使用)、临床结果(伤口愈合和愈合时间)、组织效率(咨询、住院、使用计划外护理)和估计费用方面的数据。远程监护的使用并没有改变慢性伤口治疗的安全标准。它使伤口愈合时间缩短了35天(p = 0.05)。它导致医院就诊减少55% (p≤0.01)。这些因素使护理费用估计减少了1666欧元。计划外护理(急诊服务访问、急诊住院)的持续减少并不显著。与传统监测相比,远程监测慢性伤口安全、临床有效(缩短愈合时间)。它减少了住院会诊的需要和治疗的总费用,因此可以方便地获得伤口愈合方面的专门护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
期刊最新文献
Development and Internal Validation of a Gradient Boosting Model for Pressure Injury Risk in the ICU. Two-Stage Surgical Management of Anogenital Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Patients on Biologic Therapy: A Retrospective Case Series Issue Information Enhanced Wound Healing Through Air-Break Augmentation of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Combined With Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell Transplantation in a Murine Model Knowledge of Pressure Ulcers Amongst Nurses and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1