The Scope, Range and Use of Voluntary Sector Specialist Sexual Violence Services in England: Findings and Recommendations From a National Study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Social Care in the Community Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1155/hsc/9368961
Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Sarah Damery, Kirsten Fruin, Clare Gunby, Jenny Harlock, Lucy Hebberts, Louise Isham, Anne-Marie Jones, Fay Maxted, Amelia Mighty, Priti Parmar, Laura Patterson, Jason Schaub, Fee Scott, Harriet Smailes, Debs Smith, Julie Taylor
{"title":"The Scope, Range and Use of Voluntary Sector Specialist Sexual Violence Services in England: Findings and Recommendations From a National Study","authors":"Caroline Bradbury-Jones,&nbsp;Sarah Damery,&nbsp;Kirsten Fruin,&nbsp;Clare Gunby,&nbsp;Jenny Harlock,&nbsp;Lucy Hebberts,&nbsp;Louise Isham,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Jones,&nbsp;Fay Maxted,&nbsp;Amelia Mighty,&nbsp;Priti Parmar,&nbsp;Laura Patterson,&nbsp;Jason Schaub,&nbsp;Fee Scott,&nbsp;Harriet Smailes,&nbsp;Debs Smith,&nbsp;Julie Taylor","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9368961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Sexual violence is a global problem with significant individual and societal health and social costs. Services that support victim-survivors of sexual violence across a range of sectors are crucial. This study investigated the scope, range, funding and commissioning of voluntary sector specialist (VSS) sexual violence services in England and victim-survivors’ experiences of using such services. The specialist voluntary sector plays a pivotal role in providing crisis and longer-term support to victim-survivors. However, there is limited empirical evidence about the scope, range and use of VSS provision, or what victim-survivors value and want from services. The aim of the study was to address this gap and provide much-needed evidence to inform the VSS sector nationally. This co-produced study included five co-researchers and one co-applicant with lived experience of sexual violence. There were three empirical phases: (1) exploratory interviews with commissioners and service providers and focus groups with victim-survivors; (2) national survey of service providers and commissioners; (3) in-depth case study analysis in four areas of England. The purpose of this paper is to synthesise the findings from each of these phases and map them onto a conceptual model, encompassing six themes: the complex and precarious funding landscape; the challenge of competition for funding and contracts; the role of partnership working; the pressured environments within which VSS services work; the different roles, scope and eligibility of voluntary and statutory services within an area; the ways services are delivered, underpinned by services’ values and philosophies. The study provides new, empirical insights into how these arrangements affect those connected with the services—namely, staff, volunteers and victim-survivors. The paper sets out 14 recommendations for all parties involved in the funding and commissioning of specialist services, including commissioners, grant funders and VSS organisations in England.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9368961","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9368961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual violence is a global problem with significant individual and societal health and social costs. Services that support victim-survivors of sexual violence across a range of sectors are crucial. This study investigated the scope, range, funding and commissioning of voluntary sector specialist (VSS) sexual violence services in England and victim-survivors’ experiences of using such services. The specialist voluntary sector plays a pivotal role in providing crisis and longer-term support to victim-survivors. However, there is limited empirical evidence about the scope, range and use of VSS provision, or what victim-survivors value and want from services. The aim of the study was to address this gap and provide much-needed evidence to inform the VSS sector nationally. This co-produced study included five co-researchers and one co-applicant with lived experience of sexual violence. There were three empirical phases: (1) exploratory interviews with commissioners and service providers and focus groups with victim-survivors; (2) national survey of service providers and commissioners; (3) in-depth case study analysis in four areas of England. The purpose of this paper is to synthesise the findings from each of these phases and map them onto a conceptual model, encompassing six themes: the complex and precarious funding landscape; the challenge of competition for funding and contracts; the role of partnership working; the pressured environments within which VSS services work; the different roles, scope and eligibility of voluntary and statutory services within an area; the ways services are delivered, underpinned by services’ values and philosophies. The study provides new, empirical insights into how these arrangements affect those connected with the services—namely, staff, volunteers and victim-survivors. The paper sets out 14 recommendations for all parties involved in the funding and commissioning of specialist services, including commissioners, grant funders and VSS organisations in England.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
期刊最新文献
Adult Mental Health, Major Conditions and Social Prescribing: A Rapid Review The Scope, Range and Use of Voluntary Sector Specialist Sexual Violence Services in England: Findings and Recommendations From a National Study Job Demands and Resources in Relation to Nurses’ Health in Home Care: An Integrative Literature Review Consensus Building Using Modified Delphi Panel and Nominal Group Techniques for Social Prescribing Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Developing a Consensus-Based Nature Prescribing Framework for Australian Healthcare: A Delphi Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1