Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase selective inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy and asthma proceedings Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2500/aap.2025.46.240113
Mingyue Wang, Xinghua Gao, Li Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase selective inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mingyue Wang, Xinghua Gao, Li Zhang","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.240113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although previous studies have confirmed that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a black box warning for all JAKs. Therefore, it is necessary for us to further pay attention to their safety. <b>Method:</b> The medical literature data bases were searched from database creation until August 26, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with JAK1-selective inhibitors (upadacitinib and abrocitinib) were included. <b>Results:</b> In this meta-analysis, which included 12 studies (one of which reported two outcomes), we collected data at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Almost all results showed that JAK1-selective inhibitors were more efficacious than controls and had an onset of action at week 2. There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and adverse events, leading to discontinuation, whereas, for treatment-associated adverse events, the JAK1-selective inhibitors were higher than the control group (RR 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.21]; p < 0.00001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Overall, the treatment of atopic dermatitis with JAK1-selective inhibitors has a rapid onset of action. However, we need to be aware of the treatment-associated adverse events, more studies need to be conducted to provide better decisions on clinical medications for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 2","pages":"88-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.240113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although previous studies have confirmed that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a black box warning for all JAKs. Therefore, it is necessary for us to further pay attention to their safety. Method: The medical literature data bases were searched from database creation until August 26, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with JAK1-selective inhibitors (upadacitinib and abrocitinib) were included. Results: In this meta-analysis, which included 12 studies (one of which reported two outcomes), we collected data at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Almost all results showed that JAK1-selective inhibitors were more efficacious than controls and had an onset of action at week 2. There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and adverse events, leading to discontinuation, whereas, for treatment-associated adverse events, the JAK1-selective inhibitors were higher than the control group (RR 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.21]; p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Overall, the treatment of atopic dermatitis with JAK1-selective inhibitors has a rapid onset of action. However, we need to be aware of the treatment-associated adverse events, more studies need to be conducted to provide better decisions on clinical medications for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Janus激酶选择性抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然之前的研究已经证实Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂在治疗特应性皮炎方面具有良好的疗效和安全性,但美国食品药品监督管理局(fda)对所有JAK都发出了黑盒警告。因此,我们有必要进一步关注他们的安全。方法:检索自建库至2023年8月26日的医学文献数据库。纳入了jak1选择性抑制剂(upadacitinib和abrocitinib)治疗中重度特应性皮炎的随机对照试验。结果:在这项荟萃分析中,包括12项研究(其中一项报告了两个结果),我们收集了2、4、8、12和16周的数据。几乎所有的结果都表明,jak1选择性抑制剂比对照组更有效,并且在第2周开始起作用。严重不良事件和导致停药的不良事件发生率无显著差异,而治疗相关不良事件方面,jak1选择性抑制剂的发生率高于对照组(RR 1.16[95%可信区间,1.11-1.21];结论:总体而言,jak1选择性抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎起效迅速。然而,我们需要意识到治疗相关的不良事件,需要进行更多的研究,为中重度特应性皮炎患者的临床用药提供更好的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the management of hereditary angioedema. Comparison of clinical characteristics in primary immunodeficiency patients based on the presence of autoimmunity or autoinflammation. Comprehensive assessment of allergic manifestations including drug hypersensitivity in adult patients with inborn errors of immunity. Breaking barriers: A communication bundle for penicillin allergy label removal. Cow's milk protein allergy: A risk factor for infections in infants?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1