Comparison of different approaches applied for surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology in the Young Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1017/S1047951125000617
Fan Fan, Song Bai, Xiaofeng Li, Zhiqiang Li, Feng Tong, Jian Guo, Nan Ding, Zhangke Guo
{"title":"Comparison of different approaches applied for surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.","authors":"Fan Fan, Song Bai, Xiaofeng Li, Zhiqiang Li, Feng Tong, Jian Guo, Nan Ding, Zhangke Guo","doi":"10.1017/S1047951125000617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right anterolateral thoracotomy or left anterolateral thoracotomy applied to partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection correction have been reported to obtain cosmetic and less invasive outcomes as alternative approaches to median sternotomy. However, the application of different approaches is still confusing. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes to seek indications of different approaches and guide surgical treatment of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2019 to August 2023, 44 patients who underwent surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection were recruited. Of these, 13 (29.6%) patients who underwent median sternotomy were separated into M group, 28 (63.6%) patients who underwent right anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into R group, and three (6.8%) patients who underwent left anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into L group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In M group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (7, 53.8%), in R group, intra-atrial rerouting accounted for the most (22, 78.6%), and in L group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (3, 100%). R group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (70.0 ± 32.4 vs113.1 ± 83.3, <i>p</i> = 0.029), shorter ICU stay (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, <i>p</i> = 0.01), shorter postoperative stay (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 5.0, <i>p</i> = 0.021), and fewer chest tube drainage (8.4 ± 4.3 vs 13.9 ± 10.2, <i>p</i> = 0.026) compared with M group. Three left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in L group adopted off-pump approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Median sternotomy S.V.C. can be applicable to all anatomic types of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection especially for complex types. Considering the minimally invasive advantages, we prefer applying right anterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary vein connected to right atrium or proximal end of off-pump. Applying left anterolateral thoracotomy for left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection without atrial septal defect by off-pump.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"776-783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125000617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right anterolateral thoracotomy or left anterolateral thoracotomy applied to partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection correction have been reported to obtain cosmetic and less invasive outcomes as alternative approaches to median sternotomy. However, the application of different approaches is still confusing. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes to seek indications of different approaches and guide surgical treatment of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.

Methods: From July 2019 to August 2023, 44 patients who underwent surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection were recruited. Of these, 13 (29.6%) patients who underwent median sternotomy were separated into M group, 28 (63.6%) patients who underwent right anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into R group, and three (6.8%) patients who underwent left anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into L group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between each group.

Results: In M group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (7, 53.8%), in R group, intra-atrial rerouting accounted for the most (22, 78.6%), and in L group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (3, 100%). R group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (70.0 ± 32.4 vs113.1 ± 83.3, p = 0.029), shorter ICU stay (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.01), shorter postoperative stay (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 5.0, p = 0.021), and fewer chest tube drainage (8.4 ± 4.3 vs 13.9 ± 10.2, p = 0.026) compared with M group. Three left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in L group adopted off-pump approach.

Conclusions: Median sternotomy S.V.C. can be applicable to all anatomic types of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection especially for complex types. Considering the minimally invasive advantages, we prefer applying right anterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary vein connected to right atrium or proximal end of off-pump. Applying left anterolateral thoracotomy for left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection without atrial septal defect by off-pump.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部分肺静脉连接异常手术矫正的不同入路比较。
背景:据报道,右前外侧开胸术或左前外侧开胸术用于部分异常肺静脉连接矫正,作为胸骨正中切开术的替代方法,可获得美观和微创的结果。然而,不同方法的应用仍然令人困惑。我们比较围手术期和中期的预后,以寻求不同入路的适应证,指导部分肺静脉连接异常的手术治疗。方法:选取2019年7月至2023年8月行部分肺静脉连接异常手术矫治的患者44例。其中,13例胸骨正中切开患者(29.6%)分为M组,28例右前外侧开胸患者(63.6%)分为R组,3例左前外侧开胸患者(6.8%)分为L组。回顾两组临床资料并进行比较。结果:M组直接吻合最多(7例,53.8%),R组房内转路最多(22例,78.6%),L组直接吻合最多(3例,100%)。R组体外循环时间(70.0±32.4 vs113.1±83.3,p = 0.029)、ICU住院时间(1.0±0.2 vs 1.9±1.7,p = 0.01)、术后住院时间(6.0±1.2 vs 8.3±5.0,p = 0.021)、胸管引流时间(8.4±4.3 vs 13.9±10.2,p = 0.026)均较M组缩短。L组3例左侧部分肺静脉异常连接采用非泵入路。结论:胸骨正中切开术适用于所有解剖类型的部分肺静脉连接异常,尤其适用于复杂类型。考虑到微创优势,对于连接右心房的肺静脉或离泵近端,我们倾向于采用右前外侧开胸术。左前外侧开胸术治疗无房间隔缺损的左侧部分肺静脉连接异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
期刊最新文献
Giant paediatric common carotid pseudoaneurysm after fish bone ingestion treated with primary end-to-end repair. Transcatheter extracardiac Fontan completion: a minimally invasive pathway for single-ventricle care. Developing the multidisciplinary M-COPE Psychosocial Program in a paediatric heart centre. Bidirectional Glenn and pulmonary artery banding as a bridge to arterial switch in late-diagnosed dextro-transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum. An alternative surgical approach to redo pulmonary valve replacement: the vertical left axillary thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1