"Cut umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) in preterm twin gestational births-a randomized controlled trial".

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s00431-025-06042-7
Ashadur Zamal, Rajib Losan Bora, Saugata Chaudhuri, Bijan Saha, Sambhunath Bandyopadhyay, Abhijit Hazra
{"title":"\"Cut umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) in preterm twin gestational births-a randomized controlled trial\".","authors":"Ashadur Zamal, Rajib Losan Bora, Saugata Chaudhuri, Bijan Saha, Sambhunath Bandyopadhyay, Abhijit Hazra","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06042-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is now the standard of care in singleton vigorous neonates. But consensus is lacking on the appropriate approach to placental transfusion in multifetal gestational births. In this study, we tried to determine the effect of cut umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) as compared to early cord clamping (ECC) on hematological and clinical hemodynamic parameters in preterm twin neonates of 30-37 weeks gestation. The primary outcome assessed was venous hematocrit (Hct) at 48 (± 4) h of postnatal age. Venous Hct at 6 weeks of age, mean blood pressure during the transitional period, significant neonatal morbidities, and possible sequelae were the significant secondary outcomes evaluated. In this single-center stratified randomized controlled trial, 84 pairs of twin births of 30-37 weeks gestation were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either C-UCM (n = 84) or ECC (n = 84). For statistical analysis, unpaired Student t and Chi square or Fisher's exact test were used. The C-UCM group had a higher mean Hct at 48 h than the control group, 49.74 (4.463) vs. 41.11 (4.898), p < 0.0001. The mean Hct at 12 h and 6 weeks was also significantly greater in the milked group (p < .0001). Additionally, the milked arm had significantly higher mean blood pressure at 1, 6, and 48 h of life. Similar statistically significant differences were also observed in subgroup analysis (stratified according to gestational age of 30-34 weeks, 34-37 weeks). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of potential complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>C-UCM raises the venous hematocrit and stabilizes initial blood pressure. For twin preterm neonates born between 30 and 37 weeks of gestation, it may be a useful placental transfusion technique. Further large multicentric studies are needed to fully establish its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2024/01/061865; registration date January 25, 2024.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• DCC is the standard of care for singleton vigorous neonates, but no consensus exist for multifetal gestation. • C-UCM is feasible, but studies are lacking in the preterm multifetal population.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• C-UCM is an effective placental transfusion strategy in preterm neonates of 30-37 weeks born out of twin gestation. • C-UCM can serve as a substitute for DCC in multifetal gestation especially in low resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 3","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06042-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is now the standard of care in singleton vigorous neonates. But consensus is lacking on the appropriate approach to placental transfusion in multifetal gestational births. In this study, we tried to determine the effect of cut umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) as compared to early cord clamping (ECC) on hematological and clinical hemodynamic parameters in preterm twin neonates of 30-37 weeks gestation. The primary outcome assessed was venous hematocrit (Hct) at 48 (± 4) h of postnatal age. Venous Hct at 6 weeks of age, mean blood pressure during the transitional period, significant neonatal morbidities, and possible sequelae were the significant secondary outcomes evaluated. In this single-center stratified randomized controlled trial, 84 pairs of twin births of 30-37 weeks gestation were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either C-UCM (n = 84) or ECC (n = 84). For statistical analysis, unpaired Student t and Chi square or Fisher's exact test were used. The C-UCM group had a higher mean Hct at 48 h than the control group, 49.74 (4.463) vs. 41.11 (4.898), p < 0.0001. The mean Hct at 12 h and 6 weeks was also significantly greater in the milked group (p < .0001). Additionally, the milked arm had significantly higher mean blood pressure at 1, 6, and 48 h of life. Similar statistically significant differences were also observed in subgroup analysis (stratified according to gestational age of 30-34 weeks, 34-37 weeks). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of potential complications.

Conclusion: C-UCM raises the venous hematocrit and stabilizes initial blood pressure. For twin preterm neonates born between 30 and 37 weeks of gestation, it may be a useful placental transfusion technique. Further large multicentric studies are needed to fully establish its efficacy and safety.

Trial registration: CTRI/2024/01/061865; registration date January 25, 2024.

What is known: • DCC is the standard of care for singleton vigorous neonates, but no consensus exist for multifetal gestation. • C-UCM is feasible, but studies are lacking in the preterm multifetal population.

What is new: • C-UCM is an effective placental transfusion strategy in preterm neonates of 30-37 weeks born out of twin gestation. • C-UCM can serve as a substitute for DCC in multifetal gestation especially in low resource settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Phenotypic variability in cases with CACNA1A mutation. Time to remission in childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: a change in perspective. Enhancing neonatal resuscitation outcomes: bridging theory and practice. The impact of BMI on disease activity and growth outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The MNK-SYNGAP1 axis in specific learning disorder: gene expression pattern and new perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1