Optimizing patient autonomy: a discrete choice experiment on preferences and disparities in healthcare provider selection.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01296-x
Gideon Leibner, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg
{"title":"Optimizing patient autonomy: a discrete choice experiment on preferences and disparities in healthcare provider selection.","authors":"Gideon Leibner, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01296-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2023, Israel introduced a legislative reform that, according to the Israeli Ministry of Health, aims to improve transparency and expand options for healthcare providers. This reform seeks to enhance patient choice, improve service quality and accessibility, foster competition and strengthen the public health system. The goals also include empowering patients to fully exercise their rights and make more informed healthcare decisions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores public preferences regarding hospital choice before the 2023 reform, evaluates the relative importance of key hospital attributes influencing decision-making, assuming a baseline of high-quality care and analyses how these preferences vary across demographic and socio-economic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a discrete choice experiment involving 2117 participants, this study quantifies preferences for different hospital attributes, including hospital type, geographical location, and appointment availability. The study design incorporates attributes identified through a literature review and expert interviews, optimized to estimate trade-offs between attribute levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate a strong preference for shorter waiting times and proximity to specialized services. Significant disparities emerge among respondents, particularly between those with public versus additional voluntary insurance coverage and across population groups (i.e. Arabs and Jews). A notable proportion of Arab respondents preferred the existing hospital choice regime over any suggested attribute combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While legislative reforms are designed to enhance patient involvement in decision-making, substantial gaps remain between policy intentions and actual public preferences. Although increased autonomy and choice empower patients, they can also introduce challenges, such as decision fatigue and the consumer paradox, potentially undermining reform effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for more nuanced, patient-centred health policy approaches. Future research should focus on strategies that better address the diverse needs and preferences of the population, ultimately enhancing healthcare system efficiency and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01296-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2023, Israel introduced a legislative reform that, according to the Israeli Ministry of Health, aims to improve transparency and expand options for healthcare providers. This reform seeks to enhance patient choice, improve service quality and accessibility, foster competition and strengthen the public health system. The goals also include empowering patients to fully exercise their rights and make more informed healthcare decisions.

Objectives: This study explores public preferences regarding hospital choice before the 2023 reform, evaluates the relative importance of key hospital attributes influencing decision-making, assuming a baseline of high-quality care and analyses how these preferences vary across demographic and socio-economic groups.

Methods: Utilizing a discrete choice experiment involving 2117 participants, this study quantifies preferences for different hospital attributes, including hospital type, geographical location, and appointment availability. The study design incorporates attributes identified through a literature review and expert interviews, optimized to estimate trade-offs between attribute levels.

Results: Findings indicate a strong preference for shorter waiting times and proximity to specialized services. Significant disparities emerge among respondents, particularly between those with public versus additional voluntary insurance coverage and across population groups (i.e. Arabs and Jews). A notable proportion of Arab respondents preferred the existing hospital choice regime over any suggested attribute combinations.

Conclusions: While legislative reforms are designed to enhance patient involvement in decision-making, substantial gaps remain between policy intentions and actual public preferences. Although increased autonomy and choice empower patients, they can also introduce challenges, such as decision fatigue and the consumer paradox, potentially undermining reform effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for more nuanced, patient-centred health policy approaches. Future research should focus on strategies that better address the diverse needs and preferences of the population, ultimately enhancing healthcare system efficiency and equity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化患者自主权:在医疗保健提供者选择的偏好和差异的离散选择实验。
背景:根据以色列卫生部的说法,以色列在2023年引入了一项立法改革,旨在提高透明度并扩大医疗保健提供者的选择。这一改革旨在加强患者的选择,提高服务质量和可及性,促进竞争并加强公共卫生系统。这些目标还包括使患者能够充分行使其权利并做出更明智的医疗保健决定。目的:本研究探讨了2023年改革前公众对医院选择的偏好,评估了影响决策的关键医院属性的相对重要性,假设了高质量护理的基线,并分析了这些偏好在人口和社会经济群体中的差异。方法:采用涉及2117名参与者的离散选择实验,本研究量化了对不同医院属性的偏好,包括医院类型、地理位置和预约情况。研究设计结合了通过文献回顾和专家访谈确定的属性,优化了属性水平之间的权衡。结果:调查结果表明,强烈偏好较短的等待时间和接近专业服务。答复者之间出现了重大差异,特别是那些有公共保险与额外自愿保险的人之间以及不同人口群体(即阿拉伯人和犹太人)之间的差异。相当大比例的阿拉伯答复者更喜欢现有的医院选择制度,而不是任何建议的属性组合。结论:虽然立法改革旨在加强患者对决策的参与,但政策意图与实际公众偏好之间仍存在巨大差距。虽然自主权和选择权的增加赋予了患者权力,但它们也可能带来挑战,如决策疲劳和消费者悖论,可能会破坏改革的有效性。我们的研究结果强调需要更细致、以患者为中心的卫生政策方法。未来的研究应侧重于更好地解决人口的不同需求和偏好的策略,最终提高医疗保健系统的效率和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
Political economy of adolescent mental health and well-being globally. A rapid tool for understanding how knowledge users engage with research findings in research-for-development contexts. Stakeholders' perspectives on community health nursing practice in the healthcare system of Iran: a qualitative study. Determinants of quality laboratory service provision amongst government comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. Impact assessment of telehealth medical nutrition therapy for managing cardiovascular disease risk in rural and remote NSW: the Healthy Rural Hearts study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1