Body composition analysis using CT at three aspects of the lumbar third vertebra and its impact on the diagnosis of sarcopenia.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03634-9
Hui Yang, Zekan Gao, Qingzheng Shen, Huaiqing Zhi, Wentao Cai, Xiang Wang, Xiaodong Chen, Xian Shen, Weiteng Zhang
{"title":"Body composition analysis using CT at three aspects of the lumbar third vertebra and its impact on the diagnosis of sarcopenia.","authors":"Hui Yang, Zekan Gao, Qingzheng Shen, Huaiqing Zhi, Wentao Cai, Xiang Wang, Xiaodong Chen, Xian Shen, Weiteng Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03634-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) revised the consensus in 2018, including that using computed tomography (CT) imaging of the lumbar third vertebra (L3) for the evaluation of muscle mass. However, there is currently discrepancy and confusion in the application of specific cross-sectional and cutoff values for L3. This study aimed to standardize the diagnosis of low muscle mass using L3-CT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer between July 2014 and February 2019. Sarcopenia factors were measured preoperatively. Patients were followed up to obtain actual clinical outcomes. We used the cutoff values obtained based on the inferior aspect of L3-CT images to diagnose sarcopenia in three aspects, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare long-term and short-term postoperative prognostic differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sarcopenia was found to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and overall survival in patients with all three diagnoses of sarcopenia. According to the multivariate model for predicting postoperative complications, patients with inferior-L3 sarcopenia (n = 154,13.8%) had a greater odds ratio (OR) than patients with superior-L3 sarcopenia (n = 220,19.7%) or transverse-L3 sarcopenia (n = 194,17.4%) did (OR, inferior sarcopenia vs. superior sarcopenia, transverse sarcopenia, 2.030 vs. 1.608, 1.679). Furthermore, patients with inferior-L3 sarcopenia had the highest hazard ratio (HR) (HR, inferior sarcopenia vs. superior sarcopenia, transverse sarcopenia, 1.491 vs. 1.408, 1.376) in the multivariate model for predicting overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend that when diagnosing low muscle mass using L3-CT, the intercepted cross section should be uniform and consistent with the aspect on which the cutoff value is based.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03634-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) revised the consensus in 2018, including that using computed tomography (CT) imaging of the lumbar third vertebra (L3) for the evaluation of muscle mass. However, there is currently discrepancy and confusion in the application of specific cross-sectional and cutoff values for L3. This study aimed to standardize the diagnosis of low muscle mass using L3-CT.

Materials and methods: This study included patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer between July 2014 and February 2019. Sarcopenia factors were measured preoperatively. Patients were followed up to obtain actual clinical outcomes. We used the cutoff values obtained based on the inferior aspect of L3-CT images to diagnose sarcopenia in three aspects, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare long-term and short-term postoperative prognostic differences.

Results: Sarcopenia was found to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and overall survival in patients with all three diagnoses of sarcopenia. According to the multivariate model for predicting postoperative complications, patients with inferior-L3 sarcopenia (n = 154,13.8%) had a greater odds ratio (OR) than patients with superior-L3 sarcopenia (n = 220,19.7%) or transverse-L3 sarcopenia (n = 194,17.4%) did (OR, inferior sarcopenia vs. superior sarcopenia, transverse sarcopenia, 2.030 vs. 1.608, 1.679). Furthermore, patients with inferior-L3 sarcopenia had the highest hazard ratio (HR) (HR, inferior sarcopenia vs. superior sarcopenia, transverse sarcopenia, 1.491 vs. 1.408, 1.376) in the multivariate model for predicting overall survival.

Conclusion: We recommend that when diagnosing low muscle mass using L3-CT, the intercepted cross section should be uniform and consistent with the aspect on which the cutoff value is based.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎第三椎体三面CT体成分分析及其对肌少症诊断的影响。
目的:欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(EWGSOP)在2018年修订了共识,包括使用腰椎第三椎体(L3)的计算机断层扫描(CT)成像来评估肌肉质量。然而,目前在L3的具体横截面值和截止值的应用上存在差异和混乱。本研究旨在规范低肌量的L3-CT诊断。材料和方法:本研究纳入了2014年7月至2019年2月期间接受胃癌根治性切除术的患者。术前测量肌肉减少因子。对患者进行随访,获取实际临床结果。我们利用L3-CT图像下位面得到的截断值,分别从三个方面诊断肌少症。单因素和多因素分析用于比较长期和短期术后预后差异。结果:肌少症是三种诊断均为肌少症的患者术后并发症和总生存率的独立危险因素。根据预测术后并发症的多变量模型,下l3肌减少症患者(n = 154,13.8%)的优势比(OR)高于上l3肌减少症患者(n = 220,19.7%)或横l3肌减少症患者(n = 194,17.4%) (OR,下l3肌减少症vs上l3肌减少症,横l3肌减少症,2.030 vs 1.608, 1.679)。此外,在预测总生存的多变量模型中,下l3级肌肉减少症患者的风险比(HR,下l3级肌肉减少症vs上l3级肌肉减少症,横向肌肉减少症,HR为1.491 vs 1.408, 1.376)最高。结论:我们建议在使用L3-CT诊断低肌量时,截断截面应与截断值所依据的方向一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the treatment of cutaneous tumors: from conventional therapies to targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies. Immune-inflammatory indices as predictors of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Initial management strategies for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative and oncological outcomes between local excision plus radiotherapy versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of HER2-low gastric cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1