Insights from protein frustration analysis of BRD4–cereblon degrader ternary complexes show separation of strong from weak degraders†

IF 3.597 Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics MedChemComm Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1039/D4MD00962B
Tianyi Yang, Elizaveta Mukhaleva, Wenyuan Wei, Dahlia Weiss, Ning Ma, Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram and Nagarajan Vaidehi
{"title":"Insights from protein frustration analysis of BRD4–cereblon degrader ternary complexes show separation of strong from weak degraders†","authors":"Tianyi Yang, Elizaveta Mukhaleva, Wenyuan Wei, Dahlia Weiss, Ning Ma, Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram and Nagarajan Vaidehi","doi":"10.1039/D4MD00962B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs), also known as ligand-directed degraders (LDDs), are an innovative class of small molecules that leverage the ubiquitin–proteasome system to induce the degradation of target proteins. Structure based design methods are not readily applicable for designing LDDs due to the dynamic nature of the ternary complexes. This study investigates the dynamic properties of five LDD-mediated BRD4–cereblon complexes, focusing on the challenges of evaluating linker efficiency due to the difficulty in identifying suitable computational metrics that correlate well with the cooperativity or degradation propensity of LDDs. We uncovered that protein frustration, a concept originally developed to understand protein folding, calculated for the residues in the protein–protein interface of the LDD-mediated ternary complexes recapitulate the strength of degradation of the LDDs. Our findings indicated that hydrophobic residues in the interface are among the highly frustrated residues pairs, and they are crucial in distinguishing strong degraders from weak ones. By analyzing frustration patterns, we identified key residues and interactions critical to the effectiveness of the ternary complex. These insights provide practical guidelines for designing and prioritizing more efficient degraders, paving the way for the development of next-generation LDDs with improved therapeutic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":88,"journal":{"name":"MedChemComm","volume":" 4","pages":" 1818-1828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5970,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedChemComm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/md/d4md00962b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs), also known as ligand-directed degraders (LDDs), are an innovative class of small molecules that leverage the ubiquitin–proteasome system to induce the degradation of target proteins. Structure based design methods are not readily applicable for designing LDDs due to the dynamic nature of the ternary complexes. This study investigates the dynamic properties of five LDD-mediated BRD4–cereblon complexes, focusing on the challenges of evaluating linker efficiency due to the difficulty in identifying suitable computational metrics that correlate well with the cooperativity or degradation propensity of LDDs. We uncovered that protein frustration, a concept originally developed to understand protein folding, calculated for the residues in the protein–protein interface of the LDD-mediated ternary complexes recapitulate the strength of degradation of the LDDs. Our findings indicated that hydrophobic residues in the interface are among the highly frustrated residues pairs, and they are crucial in distinguishing strong degraders from weak ones. By analyzing frustration patterns, we identified key residues and interactions critical to the effectiveness of the ternary complex. These insights provide practical guidelines for designing and prioritizing more efficient degraders, paving the way for the development of next-generation LDDs with improved therapeutic potential.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
brd4 -小脑降解物三元复合物的蛋白质挫折分析表明,强降解物与弱降解物分离。
靶向嵌合体(PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras, PROTACs),也被称为配体定向降解物(ldd),是一类利用泛素-蛋白酶体系统诱导目标蛋白降解的创新小分子。由于三元配合物的动态性,基于结构的设计方法不容易适用于ldd的设计。本研究调查了五种ldd介导的brd4 -小脑复合物的动态特性,重点关注由于难以确定与ldd的协同性或降解倾向相关的合适计算指标而评估连接效率的挑战。我们发现,蛋白质挫败度是一个最初用于理解蛋白质折叠的概念,计算了lld介导的三元复合物的蛋白质-蛋白质界面中的残基,概括了lld降解的强度。我们的研究结果表明,界面中的疏水残基是高度受挫的残基对之一,它们是区分强降解物和弱降解物的关键。通过分析受挫模式,我们确定了对三元配合物的有效性至关重要的关键残基和相互作用。这些见解为设计和优先考虑更高效的降解剂提供了实用指南,为开发具有更好治疗潜力的下一代ldd铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MedChemComm
MedChemComm BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Research and review articles in medicinal chemistry and related drug discovery science; the official journal of the European Federation for Medicinal Chemistry. In 2020, MedChemComm will change its name to RSC Medicinal Chemistry. Issue 12, 2019 will be the last issue as MedChemComm.
期刊最新文献
The effects of bioisostere substitution on the antimicrobial and physicochemical properties of supramolecular self-associating amphiphiles Design and biological evaluation of triagonist GLP-1R/GCGR/GIPR peptides as potential therapeutic agents for diabetes and obesity Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of X19: a matrine pyrazole derivatives therapeutic candidate Extending the architecture of bolaamphiphilic disinfectants: an investigation of octenidine and isooctenidine analogs The dual functions of a nor-sesquiterpene-triazole derivative against influenza A viruses through the activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway and interaction with hemagglutinin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1