Artificial intelligence for osteoporosis detection on panoramic radiography: A systematic review and meta analysis

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105650
Nikoo Ghasemi , Rata Rokhshad , Qonche Zare , Parnian Shobeiri , Falk Schwendicke
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for osteoporosis detection on panoramic radiography: A systematic review and meta analysis","authors":"Nikoo Ghasemi ,&nbsp;Rata Rokhshad ,&nbsp;Qonche Zare ,&nbsp;Parnian Shobeiri ,&nbsp;Falk Schwendicke","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mineral density and an increased risk of fractures. In dentistry, mandibular bone morphology, assessed for example on panoramic images, has been employed to detect osteoporosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) can aid in diagnosing bone diseases from radiographs. We aimed to systematically review, synthesize and appraise the available evidence supporting AI in detecting osteoporosis on panoramic radiographs.</div></div><div><h3>Data</h3><div>Studies that used AI to detect osteoporosis on dental panoramic images were included.</div></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><div>On April 8, 2023, a first comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, IEEE, arXiv, and Google Scholar (grey literature). This search was subsequently updated on October 6, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><div>The Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool-2 was employed to determine the risk of bias in the studies. Quantitative analyses involved meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy measures, including sensitivity and specificity, yielding Diagnostic Odds Ratios (DOR) and synthesized positive likelihood ratios (LR+). The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 studies were included. Accuracy ranged from 50% to 99%, sensitivity from 50% to 100%, and specificity from 38% to 100%. A minority of studies (n=10) had a low risk of bias in all domains, while the majority (n=18) showed low risk of applicability concerns. Pooled sensitivity was 87.92% and specificity 81.93%. DOR was 32.99, and L+ 4.87. Meta-regression analysis indicated that sample size had only a marginal impact on heterogeneity (R² = 0.078, p = 0.052), suggesting other study-level factors may contribute to variability. Egger's test suggested potential small-study effects (p &lt; 0.001), indicating a risk of publication bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AI, particularly deep learning, showed high diagnostic accuracy in detecting osteoporosis on panoramic radiographs. The results indicate a strong potential for AI to enhance osteoporosis screening in dental settings. However, significant heterogeneity across studies and potential small-study effects highlight the need for further validation, standardization, and larger, well-powered studies to improve model generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>The application of AI in analyzing panoramic radiographs could transform osteoporosis screening in routine dental practice by providing early and accurate diagnosis. This has the potential to integrate osteoporosis detection seamlessly into dental workflows, improving patient outcomes and enabling timely referrals for medical intervention. Addressing issues of model validation and comparability is critical to translating these findings into widespread clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105650"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225000958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mineral density and an increased risk of fractures. In dentistry, mandibular bone morphology, assessed for example on panoramic images, has been employed to detect osteoporosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) can aid in diagnosing bone diseases from radiographs. We aimed to systematically review, synthesize and appraise the available evidence supporting AI in detecting osteoporosis on panoramic radiographs.

Data

Studies that used AI to detect osteoporosis on dental panoramic images were included.

Sources

On April 8, 2023, a first comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, IEEE, arXiv, and Google Scholar (grey literature). This search was subsequently updated on October 6, 2024.

Study selection

The Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool-2 was employed to determine the risk of bias in the studies. Quantitative analyses involved meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy measures, including sensitivity and specificity, yielding Diagnostic Odds Ratios (DOR) and synthesized positive likelihood ratios (LR+). The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

Results

A total of 24 studies were included. Accuracy ranged from 50% to 99%, sensitivity from 50% to 100%, and specificity from 38% to 100%. A minority of studies (n=10) had a low risk of bias in all domains, while the majority (n=18) showed low risk of applicability concerns. Pooled sensitivity was 87.92% and specificity 81.93%. DOR was 32.99, and L+ 4.87. Meta-regression analysis indicated that sample size had only a marginal impact on heterogeneity (R² = 0.078, p = 0.052), suggesting other study-level factors may contribute to variability. Egger's test suggested potential small-study effects (p < 0.001), indicating a risk of publication bias.

Conclusion

AI, particularly deep learning, showed high diagnostic accuracy in detecting osteoporosis on panoramic radiographs. The results indicate a strong potential for AI to enhance osteoporosis screening in dental settings. However, significant heterogeneity across studies and potential small-study effects highlight the need for further validation, standardization, and larger, well-powered studies to improve model generalizability.

Clinical significance

The application of AI in analyzing panoramic radiographs could transform osteoporosis screening in routine dental practice by providing early and accurate diagnosis. This has the potential to integrate osteoporosis detection seamlessly into dental workflows, improving patient outcomes and enabling timely referrals for medical intervention. Addressing issues of model validation and comparability is critical to translating these findings into widespread clinical use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在全景x线摄影上检测骨质疏松症:系统综述和Meta分析。
骨质疏松症是一种以低骨密度和骨折风险增加为特征的疾病。在牙科,下颌骨形态学,评估,例如在全景图像上,已被用于检测骨质疏松症。人工智能(AI)可以通过x光片帮助诊断骨骼疾病。我们旨在系统地回顾、综合和评价支持人工智能在全景x线片上检测骨质疏松症的现有证据。数据:纳入人工智能在牙齿全景图像上检测骨质疏松的研究。资料来源:2023年4月8日,第一次全面检索电子数据库,包括PubMed、Scopus、Embase、IEEE、arXiv、谷歌Scholar(灰色文献)。该搜索随后于2024年10月6日更新。研究选择:采用质量评估和诊断准确性工具-2来确定研究中的偏倚风险。定量分析涉及诊断准确性指标的荟萃分析,包括敏感性和特异性,得出诊断优势比(DOR)和综合阳性似然比(LR+)。证据的确定性采用分级建议评估、发展和评估系统进行评估。结果:共纳入24项研究。准确度为50% ~ 99%,灵敏度为50% ~ 100%,特异性为38% ~ 100%。少数研究(n=10)在所有领域的偏倚风险较低,而大多数研究(n=18)在适用性方面的风险较低。敏感性为87.92%,特异性为81.93%。DOR为32.99,L+ 4.87。meta回归分析显示,样本量对异质性只有边际影响(R² = 0.078,p = 0.052),提示其他研究水平的因素也可能对变异有影响。Egger检验提示潜在的小研究效应(p < 0.001),表明存在发表偏倚的风险。结论:人工智能特别是深度学习对骨质疏松症在全景x线片上的诊断准确率较高。结果表明,人工智能在增强牙科骨质疏松症筛查方面具有很大的潜力。然而,研究之间的显著异质性和潜在的小研究效应强调需要进一步验证、标准化和更大规模、更有力的研究来提高模型的通用性。临床意义:人工智能在全景x线片分析中的应用,可以改变常规牙科骨质疏松筛查,提供早期、准确的诊断。这有可能将骨质疏松症检测无缝整合到牙科工作流程中,改善患者的治疗效果,并及时转诊进行医疗干预。解决模型验证和可比性问题对于将这些发现转化为广泛的临床应用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the accuracy and effectiveness of two robotic surgical techniques for zygomatic implant placement: an in vitro study Performance and repeatability of different models of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) in generating removable partial denture framework designs. A comparative study Navigation implant surgery accuracy in different types of edentulism: A systematic review and meta-analysis Evaluation of surface and positional trueness of removable dies fabricated through fused filament fabrication Facial surface tracing approach to reduce the observation errors in 3D curvilinear landmark annotations on cone-beam computed tomography images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1