A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z
Daniella Holland-Hart, Mirella Longo, Sarah Bridges, Lisette Nixon, Maria Hawkins, Tom Crosby, Annmarie Nelson
{"title":"A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer.","authors":"Daniella Holland-Hart, Mirella Longo, Sarah Bridges, Lisette Nixon, Maria Hawkins, Tom Crosby, Annmarie Nelson","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This qualitative study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. The trial studied radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemo-radiation. SCOPE2 embedded a phase II trial for patients with a poor early response using positron emission tomography (PET) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal interview study took place between 2017 and 2021. Patients eligible for chemoradiotherapy were recruited from five clinical sites in the UK. Participants were invited to participate in three semi-structured interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2-3 months, 3-6 months or 6 months + after baseline. This paper focuses on recruitment to the trial, practical management, the impact of COVID-19 and reflections of being on the trial. Real-time reporting to the trial team was used to inform potential improvements to trial conduct and recruitment. The interviews were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants were interviewed in 16 longitudinal interviews. There were five female and five male interview participants; three participants were accompanied by companions during their interviews. Recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was challenging. Motivations for joining the trial included altruism, potentially receiving better care and monitoring and the opportunity to improve their quality of life. Participants required adequate time to consider information and regular updates regarding trial and treatment process. Participants felt that their trial experience was minimally impacted by COVID-19, although some delays to treatment were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased opportunities for patients to discuss and receive appropriate and timely information from trial staff and third sector partners could enhance patients' understanding of future trials, treatments and procedures. Slow recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was further impeded by the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials would benefit from a more fully integrated approach to qualitative recruitment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02741856 registered on 12 April 2016; ISRCTN: 9,712,546 registered on 26 October 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This qualitative study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. The trial studied radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemo-radiation. SCOPE2 embedded a phase II trial for patients with a poor early response using positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

Methods: This longitudinal interview study took place between 2017 and 2021. Patients eligible for chemoradiotherapy were recruited from five clinical sites in the UK. Participants were invited to participate in three semi-structured interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2-3 months, 3-6 months or 6 months + after baseline. This paper focuses on recruitment to the trial, practical management, the impact of COVID-19 and reflections of being on the trial. Real-time reporting to the trial team was used to inform potential improvements to trial conduct and recruitment. The interviews were thematically analysed.

Results: Ten participants were interviewed in 16 longitudinal interviews. There were five female and five male interview participants; three participants were accompanied by companions during their interviews. Recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was challenging. Motivations for joining the trial included altruism, potentially receiving better care and monitoring and the opportunity to improve their quality of life. Participants required adequate time to consider information and regular updates regarding trial and treatment process. Participants felt that their trial experience was minimally impacted by COVID-19, although some delays to treatment were reported.

Conclusion: Increased opportunities for patients to discuss and receive appropriate and timely information from trial staff and third sector partners could enhance patients' understanding of future trials, treatments and procedures. Slow recruitment to the trial and qualitative study was further impeded by the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials would benefit from a more fully integrated approach to qualitative recruitment.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02741856 registered on 12 April 2016; ISRCTN: 9,712,546 registered on 26 October 2016.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项探讨参与者在SCOPE2试验中的经验的定性研究:食管癌放化疗剂量递增。
本定性研究探讨了患者对SCOPE2试验的体验和看法。该试验研究了无法手术的食管癌患者放疗剂量的增加。SCOPE2嵌入了一项使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)扫描早期反应差的患者的II期试验。方法:该纵向访谈研究于2017年至2021年进行。符合放化疗条件的患者从英国的五个临床地点招募。参与者被邀请在四个不同的时间点参加三次半结构化访谈:基线(治疗前)和基线后2-3个月,3-6个月或6个月以上。本文主要从临床试验的招募、实际管理、新冠肺炎疫情对临床试验的影响以及对临床试验的思考等方面进行阐述。向试验小组实时报告,告知试验进行和招募的潜在改进。对访谈进行了主题分析。结果:16次纵向访谈共访谈10人。受访对象中有5名女性和5名男性;三名参与者在接受采访时由同伴陪同。试验和定性研究的招募是具有挑战性的。参加试验的动机包括利他主义,可能得到更好的照顾和监测,并有机会提高他们的生活质量。参与者需要足够的时间来考虑有关试验和治疗过程的信息和定期更新。参与者认为,他们的试验经历受到COVID-19的影响最小,尽管据报道有一些治疗延误。结论:增加患者与试验工作人员和第三部门合作伙伴讨论并获得适当及时信息的机会,可以增强患者对未来试验、治疗和程序的了解。COVID-19大流行进一步阻碍了试验和定性研究的缓慢招募,未来的试验将受益于更全面整合的定性招募方法。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02741856于2016年4月12日注册;ISRCTN: 9,712,546注册于2016年10月26日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Impact of the POPulation Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on suspected asthma patients: protocol for the POPMIX-Asthma cluster-randomized controlled trial. Effect of distant-image screen technology (DIST) on delaying myopia onset in pre-myopia children: study protocol for a1-year randomized controlled trial. Nintedanib in progressive bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) grade 0p-1-2 in lung transplant recipients (INFINITIx-BOS): protocol of a French multicenter randomized controlled trial. The power, potential of real-world data in randomized controlled trials: proceedings from a multistakeholder think tank. Applying a hypothetical strategy to the intercurrent event of non-adherence with the parametric g-formula: a post hoc secondary analysis of the MET-PREVENT randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1