A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.
{"title":"A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.","authors":"Ryutaro Kobayashi, Kay Uehara, Tomoki Ebata, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Yuanying Li, Koya Hida, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Soichiro Ishihara, Shimpei Ogawa, Akio Shiomi, Kazushige Kawai, Yoichi Ajioka","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.
Methods: This observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.
Results: LPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).
Conclusions: In conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.