The Data Monitoring Experience in Empagliflozin Randomized Clinical Trials Between 2011 and 2024.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s43441-025-00749-3
Francine K Welty, Klaus G Parhofer, Marvin Konstam, Michael K Palmer, Barry Greenberg, Ralph Daher, Tim Clayton
{"title":"The Data Monitoring Experience in Empagliflozin Randomized Clinical Trials Between 2011 and 2024.","authors":"Francine K Welty, Klaus G Parhofer, Marvin Konstam, Michael K Palmer, Barry Greenberg, Ralph Daher, Tim Clayton","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00749-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In November 2007, a black box warning was mandated for rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on an increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular (CV) events. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a directive that a CV outcomes trial must be done for any new diabetes drug to demonstrate no CV harm. Therefore, the Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) trial was started in 2011 alongside 13 additional randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of empagliflozin in T2DM. The results of EMPA-REG OUTCOME set the stage for later RCTs in heart failure. Results from these clinical trials have changed the outlook for patients both with and without T2DM and with and without heart failure. A Program Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) with the same core members was utilized for these trials between 2011 and 2024. This committee is likely to be one of the longest serving DMCs since it served 28 trials with empagliflozin between 2011 and 2024. The committee encountered several important challenges which are discussed in this article. Moreover, the committee provides several important take-home messages which we hope will be of value in discussing issues in creating, developing and running DMCs in the future. These include: 1. Whether and when to be blinded and unblinded; 2. How to proceed when the primary endpoint shows no evidence of benefit, but there is evidence for a mortality benefit; 3. Development of presentation of data using figures and boxplots for rapid review of adverse events and laboratory data to assess clinical challenges; 4. How to manage a catastrophic serious adverse event; 5. Suggestions for an ideal structure of the report for the DMC closed session; and 6. The relation between the DMC, sponsor and Contract Research Organization. Our experience emphasizes the value of continuity with the same members serving over a 13-year period.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"489-504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00749-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In November 2007, a black box warning was mandated for rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on an increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular (CV) events. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a directive that a CV outcomes trial must be done for any new diabetes drug to demonstrate no CV harm. Therefore, the Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) trial was started in 2011 alongside 13 additional randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of empagliflozin in T2DM. The results of EMPA-REG OUTCOME set the stage for later RCTs in heart failure. Results from these clinical trials have changed the outlook for patients both with and without T2DM and with and without heart failure. A Program Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) with the same core members was utilized for these trials between 2011 and 2024. This committee is likely to be one of the longest serving DMCs since it served 28 trials with empagliflozin between 2011 and 2024. The committee encountered several important challenges which are discussed in this article. Moreover, the committee provides several important take-home messages which we hope will be of value in discussing issues in creating, developing and running DMCs in the future. These include: 1. Whether and when to be blinded and unblinded; 2. How to proceed when the primary endpoint shows no evidence of benefit, but there is evidence for a mortality benefit; 3. Development of presentation of data using figures and boxplots for rapid review of adverse events and laboratory data to assess clinical challenges; 4. How to manage a catastrophic serious adverse event; 5. Suggestions for an ideal structure of the report for the DMC closed session; and 6. The relation between the DMC, sponsor and Contract Research Organization. Our experience emphasizes the value of continuity with the same members serving over a 13-year period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011 - 2024年依帕列净随机临床试验数据监测经验
2007年11月,基于缺血性心血管(CV)事件风险增加,罗格列酮被授权用于2型糖尿病(T2DM)的黑框警告。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)发布了一项指令,要求任何新的糖尿病药物必须进行心血管结果试验,以证明没有心血管损害。因此,2011年启动了恩帕列净2型糖尿病患者心血管结局事件试验(EMPA-REG Outcome),同时启动了另外13项关于恩帕列净治疗2型糖尿病的随机临床试验(rct)。EMPA-REG OUTCOME的结果为后来的心力衰竭随机对照试验奠定了基础。这些临床试验的结果改变了伴有和不伴有2型糖尿病以及伴有和不伴有心力衰竭的患者的前景。2011年至2024年期间,这些试验使用了具有相同核心成员的项目数据监测委员会(DMC)。该委员会可能是服务时间最长的dmc之一,因为它在2011年至2024年期间参与了28项恩帕列净试验。委员会遇到了几个重要的挑战,本文将对此进行讨论。此外,委员会还提供了一些重要的关键信息,我们希望这些信息对今后讨论创建、发展和运行dmc的问题有价值。这些包括:1;是否以及何时要盲目和不盲目;2. 当主要终点没有证据表明获益,但有证据表明死亡率获益时,如何继续进行;3. 开发使用图表和箱形图的数据展示,以便快速审查不良事件和实验室数据,以评估临床挑战;4. 如何处理灾难性严重不良事件;5. 对发展管理委员会非公开会议报告的理想结构提出建议;和6。DMC、赞助商和合同研究组织之间的关系。我们的经验强调了在13年的任期内保持同一成员的连续性的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Lessons and Insights from a Case Study on Clinical Trial Fraud. Challenges in Conducting Quantitative Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Assessments: A Case Study in Ph + ALL with Immature Efficacy Data. Incorporating Patient Perspectives into Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Drug Development Framework Recommendation. Assessing the Contribution of Components in Late-Phase Oncology Trials: A Roadmap of Key Approaches. Challenges and Potential Solutions to Advance Global Cancer Drug Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1