Vaping cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Control Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1136/tc-2024-058798
Javad Heshmati, Avinash Pandey, Joseph Benjamen, Muhammad Furqan, Muhammad Salman, Sarah Visintini, Kerri-Anne Mullen, Gordon Guyatt, Andrew L Pipe, Hassan Mir
{"title":"Vaping cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Javad Heshmati, Avinash Pandey, Joseph Benjamen, Muhammad Furqan, Muhammad Salman, Sarah Visintini, Kerri-Anne Mullen, Gordon Guyatt, Andrew L Pipe, Hassan Mir","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as e-cigarettes, have surged in popularity. While long-term risks remain unclear, known dangers include nicotine addiction, E-cigarette or Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury and potential extrapulmonary effects on the heart, immune system and neurodevelopment. Addressing ENDS addiction may require strategies akin to smoking cessation. However, evidence is lacking; there are no currently approved vaping-cessation aids. The objective of this review is to summarise the available literature addressing interventions for vaping cessation.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study selection: </strong>A librarian-assisted search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, as well as preprints in Europe PMC, Open Science Framework, and the grey literature searches until January 2024. Six included studies used self-report methods to determine the abstinence rate, while one study used cotinine-level-verified self-reported abstinence. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that examine 'rates of vaping cessation' outcomes. An intention-to-treat approach was used for data extraction, and random-effects meta-analyses models were applied.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Seven RCTs were included, which studied pharmacological therapy, digital interventions and/or educational content. The primary meta-analyses demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the odds of achieving 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.01, number of participants=3244, moderate-certainty) and continuous abstinence (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.61, number of participants=164, low-certainty) following intervention. A non-significant increase in odds was noted at 30-day PPA (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.42, number of participants=1994, very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaping cessation interventions increase 7-day PPA rates at 1-12 months follow-up and this was consistent across prespecified subgroup analyses of the intervention type, outcome and duration of follow-up. More high-quality studies with reproducible findings are needed to enhance the certainty of the evidence and guide clinical interventions.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022383670.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as e-cigarettes, have surged in popularity. While long-term risks remain unclear, known dangers include nicotine addiction, E-cigarette or Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury and potential extrapulmonary effects on the heart, immune system and neurodevelopment. Addressing ENDS addiction may require strategies akin to smoking cessation. However, evidence is lacking; there are no currently approved vaping-cessation aids. The objective of this review is to summarise the available literature addressing interventions for vaping cessation.

Data sources and study selection: A librarian-assisted search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, as well as preprints in Europe PMC, Open Science Framework, and the grey literature searches until January 2024. Six included studies used self-report methods to determine the abstinence rate, while one study used cotinine-level-verified self-reported abstinence. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that examine 'rates of vaping cessation' outcomes. An intention-to-treat approach was used for data extraction, and random-effects meta-analyses models were applied.

Data synthesis: Seven RCTs were included, which studied pharmacological therapy, digital interventions and/or educational content. The primary meta-analyses demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the odds of achieving 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.01, number of participants=3244, moderate-certainty) and continuous abstinence (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.61, number of participants=164, low-certainty) following intervention. A non-significant increase in odds was noted at 30-day PPA (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.42, number of participants=1994, very low certainty).

Conclusions: Vaping cessation interventions increase 7-day PPA rates at 1-12 months follow-up and this was consistent across prespecified subgroup analyses of the intervention type, outcome and duration of follow-up. More high-quality studies with reproducible findings are needed to enhance the certainty of the evidence and guide clinical interventions.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022383670.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戒烟干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS),如电子烟,已经迅速普及。虽然长期风险尚不清楚,但已知的危险包括尼古丁成瘾、电子烟或电子烟使用相关的肺损伤,以及对心脏、免疫系统和神经发育的潜在肺外影响。解决终端成瘾问题可能需要类似于戒烟的策略。然而,缺乏证据;目前还没有批准的戒烟辅助工具。本综述的目的是总结有关戒烟干预措施的现有文献。数据来源和研究选择:图书馆协助检索MEDLINE, Embase和Scopus,以及欧洲PMC,开放科学框架的预印,以及灰色文献检索,直到2024年1月。六项纳入的研究使用自我报告方法来确定戒断率,而一项研究使用可替宁水平验证的自我报告戒断。我们纳入了检查“戒烟率”结果的随机对照试验(rct)。采用意向治疗方法提取数据,并采用随机效应荟萃分析模型。数据综合:纳入7项随机对照试验,研究药物治疗、数字干预和/或教育内容。初步荟萃分析显示,干预后实现7天点流行戒断(PPA) (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15至2.01,参与者人数=3244,中等确定性)和持续戒断(OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.31至5.61,参与者人数=164,低确定性)的几率在统计学上显著增加。在30天的PPA时,发生率无显著增加(OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.72至2.42,参与者人数=1994,非常低的确定性)。结论:在1-12个月的随访中,戒烟干预增加了7天PPA率,这与预先指定的干预类型、结果和随访时间的亚组分析一致。需要更多具有可重复结果的高质量研究来提高证据的确定性并指导临床干预。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022383670。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
期刊最新文献
Effects of menthol cigarette and e-cigarette flavour restrictions on tobacco product purchasing: insights from the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace. What is the best tobacco control policy in Tuscany? An assessment using uncertainty analysis. Forecasting the effects of smoking prevalence scenarios on health and economic burdens in China from 2022 to 2040. South Africa's illicit cigarette crisis: evidence from the 2021 Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Registered tobacco and vaping lobbying activity in Ireland, 2016-2024: the case for strengthening implementation of the Framework Convention of Tobacco Control Article 5.3 to clear the path for tobacco endgame.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1