Enacting embryos: Practices, ontologies, and politics of the IVF lab post-Dobbs

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Medical Anthropology Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1111/maq.12916
Manon Lefevre
{"title":"Enacting embryos: Practices, ontologies, and politics of the IVF lab post-Dobbs","authors":"Manon Lefevre","doi":"10.1111/maq.12916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn the federal right to abortion, much public and political debate has surrounded gestating and in vitro embryos’ “personhood.” In this paper, I draw on 15 months of participant observation in biomedical spaces of infertility to reveal how embryos can be enacted as not only unborn children but as many different kinds of entities. I examine how embryos become “multiple” as in vitro fertilization (IVF) professionals inseminate, monitor, and transfer them into patients’ bodies: enacting them as makeable, contingent, recordable, animatable, predictable, introducible, praisable, and appraisable entities. Providing a new perspective into the varied ontologies of in vitro embryos, this paper has far-reaching implications for the anthropological study and politics of reproductive medicine and politics today</p>","PeriodicalId":47649,"journal":{"name":"Medical Anthropology Quarterly","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Anthropology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maq.12916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn the federal right to abortion, much public and political debate has surrounded gestating and in vitro embryos’ “personhood.” In this paper, I draw on 15 months of participant observation in biomedical spaces of infertility to reveal how embryos can be enacted as not only unborn children but as many different kinds of entities. I examine how embryos become “multiple” as in vitro fertilization (IVF) professionals inseminate, monitor, and transfer them into patients’ bodies: enacting them as makeable, contingent, recordable, animatable, predictable, introducible, praisable, and appraisable entities. Providing a new perspective into the varied ontologies of in vitro embryos, this paper has far-reaching implications for the anthropological study and politics of reproductive medicine and politics today

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外受精胚胎:实践、本体论和多布斯后试管婴儿实验室的政治。
在最高法院于2022年决定推翻联邦堕胎权之后,许多公众和政治辩论都围绕着怀孕和体外胚胎的“人格”展开。在本文中,我借鉴了15个月的参与观察在生物医学领域的不孕症揭示如何胚胎可以制定不仅是未出生的孩子,但作为许多不同种类的实体。我研究了胚胎如何成为“多重”体外受精(IVF)专业人员授精、监测和转移到患者体内:使它们成为可制造的、偶然的、可记录的、可动画的、可预测的、可引入的、可赞扬的和可评估的实体。本文提供了一个新的视角来看待体外胚胎的各种本体,对当今生殖医学和政治的人类学研究和政治具有深远的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Medical Anthropology Quarterly: International Journal for the Analysis of Health publishes research and theory in the field of medical anthropology. This broad field views all inquiries into health and disease in human individuals and populations from the holistic and cross-cultural perspective distinctive of anthropology as a discipline -- that is, with an awareness of species" biological, cultural, linguistic, and historical uniformity and variation. It encompasses studies of ethnomedicine, epidemiology, maternal and child health, population, nutrition, human development in relation to health and disease, health-care providers and services, public health, health policy, and the language and speech of health and health care.
期刊最新文献
Concealed coexistence: Reproductive choice and coercion in Timor-Leste. Obstetric racism in Europe: Linguistic racism, exoticization, and uneven reproduction in the Netherlands. Caring for the institution: An ethnography of quality assurance policy in U.S. rural primary care. Medical pluralism and kincentric care in Indigenous Australia: Yanyuwa experiences of illness and the importance of keeping company. Living a "good death": Caring for solitary deaths in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1