[Examination of Simultaneous Extraction Method of 19 Food Additives in Processed Foods].

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Hygiene and Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3358/shokueishi.66.1
Tomoki Igarashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Mari Morikawa, Keiko Ushiyama, Chigusa Kobayashi, Yukiko Yamajima, Yuki Sadamasu, Kenji Otsuka
{"title":"[Examination of Simultaneous Extraction Method of 19 Food Additives in Processed Foods].","authors":"Tomoki Igarashi, Takahiro Sasaki, Mari Morikawa, Keiko Ushiyama, Chigusa Kobayashi, Yukiko Yamajima, Yuki Sadamasu, Kenji Otsuka","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.66.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we developed a simultaneous extraction method for 19 food additives, including sweeteners, preservatives, and antioxidants, to enhance testing efficiency across a wide range of processed foods. Samples underwent 2 or 4 extractions with acetonitrile containing 0.05 w/v% ascorbic acid palmitate, facilitated by the addition of water, phosphoric acid, magnesium sulfate, and sodium chloride. The extracts were then diluted and analyzed using instruments tailored to each specific compound. Recovery tests (n=5 or n=3) on 22 samples, encompassing high-protein, oily, and powdered foods, demonstrated satisfactory recovery rates between 76.6% and 111.6% (RSD: 0.1-6.6%). To validate the method, two concentrations-corresponding to the lower limit of quantification and the maximum permissible level-were added to two or three different samples per additives. This validation was conducted by a single analyst over two parallel runs across five days. The results indicated that the lower limit of quantification achieved trueness of 81.7-102.4%, repeatability of 0.3-6.3%, and within-laboratory reproducibility of 1.0-9.7%. Similarly, for the maximum level of use, trueness ranged from 80.6 to 105.5%, repeatability from 0.4 to 2.8%, and within-laboratory reproducibility from 0.6 to 4.3%, all meeting the target criteria. The developed method proves to be a valuable analytical tool, significantly enhancing the efficiency of food additive analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"66 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.66.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we developed a simultaneous extraction method for 19 food additives, including sweeteners, preservatives, and antioxidants, to enhance testing efficiency across a wide range of processed foods. Samples underwent 2 or 4 extractions with acetonitrile containing 0.05 w/v% ascorbic acid palmitate, facilitated by the addition of water, phosphoric acid, magnesium sulfate, and sodium chloride. The extracts were then diluted and analyzed using instruments tailored to each specific compound. Recovery tests (n=5 or n=3) on 22 samples, encompassing high-protein, oily, and powdered foods, demonstrated satisfactory recovery rates between 76.6% and 111.6% (RSD: 0.1-6.6%). To validate the method, two concentrations-corresponding to the lower limit of quantification and the maximum permissible level-were added to two or three different samples per additives. This validation was conducted by a single analyst over two parallel runs across five days. The results indicated that the lower limit of quantification achieved trueness of 81.7-102.4%, repeatability of 0.3-6.3%, and within-laboratory reproducibility of 1.0-9.7%. Similarly, for the maximum level of use, trueness ranged from 80.6 to 105.5%, repeatability from 0.4 to 2.8%, and within-laboratory reproducibility from 0.6 to 4.3%, all meeting the target criteria. The developed method proves to be a valuable analytical tool, significantly enhancing the efficiency of food additive analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[加工食品中19种食品添加剂同时提取方法的检验]。
在这项研究中,我们开发了一种同时提取19种食品添加剂的方法,包括甜味剂、防腐剂和抗氧化剂,以提高对各种加工食品的检测效率。样品用含有0.05 w/v%抗坏血酸棕榈酸酯的乙腈进行2或4次提取,并加入水、磷酸、硫酸镁和氯化钠。然后将提取物稀释,并使用为每种特定化合物量身定制的仪器进行分析。对22个样品(n=5或n=3),包括高蛋白、油性和粉状食品,回收率在76.6% ~ 111.6% (RSD: 0.1 ~ 6.6%)之间,令人满意。为了验证该方法,在每种添加剂的两个或三个不同样品中添加两个浓度-对应于定量下限和最大允许水平。这个验证是由一个分析人员在5天内进行的两次并行运行。结果表明,定量下限的准确度为81.7 ~ 102.4%,重复性为0.3 ~ 6.3%,室内重复性为1.0 ~ 9.7%。同样,对于最大使用水平,真实度范围为80.6至105.5%,重复性范围为0.4至2.8%,实验室内重复性范围为0.6至4.3%,均符合目标标准。该方法是一种有价值的分析工具,可显著提高食品添加剂的分析效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
[Examination of Simultaneous Extraction Method of 19 Food Additives in Processed Foods]. [Ruhemann's Purple Monitoring by UHPLC/MS/MS for Ninhydrin Test]. [Validation of High-Sensitivity Analysis for Chloropropanols and Related Substances in Infant Formula]. [Development and Performance Evaluation of an Analytical Method for Resorcylic Acid Lactones in Bovine Urine for Monitoring Japanese Beef Exports to the European Union]. [Effect of Peracetic Acid Formulation on Hygiene Indicator Bacteria in Cut Salads].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1