Leveraging machine learning and rule extraction for enhanced transparency in emergency department length of stay prediction.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1498939
Waqar A Sulaiman, Charithea Stylianides, Andria Nikolaou, Zinonas Antoniou, Ioannis Constantinou, Lakis Palazis, Anna Vavlitou, Theodoros Kyprianou, Efthyvoulos Kyriacou, Antonis Kakas, Marios S Pattichis, Andreas S Panayides, Constantinos S Pattichis
{"title":"Leveraging machine learning and rule extraction for enhanced transparency in emergency department length of stay prediction.","authors":"Waqar A Sulaiman, Charithea Stylianides, Andria Nikolaou, Zinonas Antoniou, Ioannis Constantinou, Lakis Palazis, Anna Vavlitou, Theodoros Kyprianou, Efthyvoulos Kyriacou, Antonis Kakas, Marios S Pattichis, Andreas S Panayides, Constantinos S Pattichis","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1498939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to address the critical issue of emergency department (ED) overcrowding, which negatively affects patient outcomes, wait times, and resource efficiency. Accurate prediction of ED length of stay (LOS) can streamline operations and improve care delivery. We utilized the MIMIC IV-ED dataset, comprising over 400,000 patient records, to classify ED LOS into short (≤4.5 hours) and long (>4.5 hours) categories. Using machine learning models, including Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), we identified GB as the best performing model outperforming the other models with an AUC of 0.730, accuracy of 69.93%, sensitivity of 88.20%, and specificity of 40.95% on the original dataset. In the balanced dataset, GB had an AUC of 0.729, accuracy of 68.86%, sensitivity of 75.39%, and specificity of 58.59%. To enhance interpretability, a novel rule extraction method for GB model was implemented using relevant important predictors, such as triage acuity, comorbidity scores, and arrival methods. By combining predictive analytics with interpretable rule-based methods, this research provides actionable insights for optimizing patient flow and resource allocation. The findings highlight the importance of transparency in machine learning applications for healthcare, paving the way for future improvements in model performance and clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1498939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1498939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to address the critical issue of emergency department (ED) overcrowding, which negatively affects patient outcomes, wait times, and resource efficiency. Accurate prediction of ED length of stay (LOS) can streamline operations and improve care delivery. We utilized the MIMIC IV-ED dataset, comprising over 400,000 patient records, to classify ED LOS into short (≤4.5 hours) and long (>4.5 hours) categories. Using machine learning models, including Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), we identified GB as the best performing model outperforming the other models with an AUC of 0.730, accuracy of 69.93%, sensitivity of 88.20%, and specificity of 40.95% on the original dataset. In the balanced dataset, GB had an AUC of 0.729, accuracy of 68.86%, sensitivity of 75.39%, and specificity of 58.59%. To enhance interpretability, a novel rule extraction method for GB model was implemented using relevant important predictors, such as triage acuity, comorbidity scores, and arrival methods. By combining predictive analytics with interpretable rule-based methods, this research provides actionable insights for optimizing patient flow and resource allocation. The findings highlight the importance of transparency in machine learning applications for healthcare, paving the way for future improvements in model performance and clinical adoption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习和规则提取来提高急诊部门住院时间预测的透明度。
本研究旨在解决急诊科(ED)过度拥挤的关键问题,这对患者预后、等待时间和资源效率产生负面影响。准确预测急诊科住院时间(LOS)可以简化操作并改善护理服务。我们利用MIMIC IV-ED数据集,包括超过40万例患者记录,将ED LOS分为短(≤4.5小时)和长(>4.5小时)两类。使用机器学习模型,包括梯度增强(GB)、随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)和多层感知器(MLP),我们确定GB是表现最好的模型,在原始数据集上的AUC为0.730,准确率为69.93%,灵敏度为88.20%,特异性为40.95%。在平衡数据集中,GB的AUC为0.729,准确度为68.86%,灵敏度为75.39%,特异性为58.59%。为了提高可解释性,利用相关的重要预测因子,如分诊敏锐度、合并症评分和到达方法,实现了一种新的GB模型规则提取方法。通过将预测分析与基于可解释规则的方法相结合,本研究为优化患者流和资源分配提供了可操作的见解。研究结果强调了医疗保健机器学习应用中透明度的重要性,为未来改进模型性能和临床应用铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing ChatGPT vs. evidence-based online responses for polycystic ovary syndrome self-management and education: an international cross-sectional blinded survey of healthcare professionals. Evaluating privacy leakages in LLM-driven ambient clinical documentation. Translating behavioral interventions into virtual reality: the Transcend Framework for immersive health design. Cybersecurity breaches in medical devices: analyzing FDA safety communications in response to patient security concerns. Editorial: Advancing digital mental health for youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1