Cross-context Validation of a Technostress Scale for the Aging Workforce.

Anna Comotti, Alice Fattori, Cristina Di Tecco, Pasquale Bufano, Marco Laurino, Francesca Mastorci, Simone Russo, Teresa Barnini, Luca Ferrari, Catalina Ciocan, Matteo Bonzini
{"title":"Cross-context Validation of a Technostress Scale for the Aging Workforce.","authors":"Anna Comotti, Alice Fattori, Cristina Di Tecco, Pasquale Bufano, Marco Laurino, Francesca Mastorci, Simone Russo, Teresa Barnini, Luca Ferrari, Catalina Ciocan, Matteo Bonzini","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the psychometric properties of a workplace-adapted version of an existing Technostress scale to assess technostress in workers over 50 across different companies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 470 workers over 50 across finance, packaging, and steel sectors. We evaluated the internal consistency, criterion validity, and factor structure of the Technostress scale using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlations with stress, coping, well-being, and workability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scale and subscales demonstrated strong reliability (coefficients > 0.75) and validity. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed bifactor model with optimal fit indices (comparative fit index = 0.98, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.96, root mean square error of approximation = 0.05). Technostress correlated positively with stress and negatively with well-being and workability. Significant differences in technostress were observed by sex and occupational role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adapted scale is a reliable tool for evaluating technostress among older workers, supporting tailored interventions to enhance workplace well-being and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e347-e351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the psychometric properties of a workplace-adapted version of an existing Technostress scale to assess technostress in workers over 50 across different companies.

Methods: Data were collected from 470 workers over 50 across finance, packaging, and steel sectors. We evaluated the internal consistency, criterion validity, and factor structure of the Technostress scale using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlations with stress, coping, well-being, and workability.

Results: Scale and subscales demonstrated strong reliability (coefficients > 0.75) and validity. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed bifactor model with optimal fit indices (comparative fit index = 0.98, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.96, root mean square error of approximation = 0.05). Technostress correlated positively with stress and negatively with well-being and workability. Significant differences in technostress were observed by sex and occupational role.

Conclusions: The adapted scale is a reliable tool for evaluating technostress among older workers, supporting tailored interventions to enhance workplace well-being and productivity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老龄化劳动力技术压力量表的跨情境验证。
摘要:目的:本研究考察了现有技术压力量表的工作场所适应版的心理测量特征,以评估不同公司50岁以上员工的技术压力。方法:从470名50岁以上的金融、包装和钢铁行业的工人中收集数据。我们使用Cronbach's alpha、McDonald's Omega、验证性因子分析以及与压力、应对、幸福感和可操作性的相关性来评估技术压力量表的内部一致性、标准效度和因子结构。结果:量表和子量表具有较强的信度和效度(系数>0.75)。CFA证实双因素模型具有最优拟合指标(CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.05)。技术压力与压力呈正相关,与幸福感和可操作性呈负相关。技术压力在性别和职业角色上存在显著差异。结论:适应量表是评估老年员工技术压力的可靠工具,支持量身定制的干预措施,以提高工作场所的幸福感和生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occupational Consistency between Main and Side Jobs and Age-related Differences in Occupational Injuries or Diseases among Japanese Workers: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Exploring Metal Mixtures Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Miami Dade. Age Differences in the Effects of Depression and Health Status on Work Productivity Among Korean Workers. Effectiveness of a Workplace Web-Based Multi-Component Intervention on Lifestyle, Health, and Work Productivity in Beauty Consultants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Women's work assessments, provider interactions, and discussions of work accommodations in pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1