Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-04-17 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052
Holly J. Giles-Clark , Sasha M. Skinner , May M. Linn , Daniel L. Rolnik , Ben W. Mol
{"title":"Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review","authors":"Holly J. Giles-Clark ,&nbsp;Sasha M. Skinner ,&nbsp;May M. Linn ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Rolnik ,&nbsp;Ben W. Mol","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intrapartum fetal hypoxia (IFH) occurs infrequently and many cases occur unexpectedly, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk fetuses to prevent hypoxic injury during birth.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate existing prediction models for IFH and ascertain the predictor variables that were incorporated into most models.</div></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to December 2023 for synonyms of fetal distress, operative birth and neonatal asphyxia, with a filter for prediction models.</div></div><div><h3>Selection criteria</h3><div>Prediction models for IFH were included. IFH was defined as evidence of hypoxia or operative intervention for suspected fetal distress.</div></div><div><h3>Data collection and analysis</h3><div>Two authors independently extracted information on study design, outcome definition and validation. We evaluated study quality using the PROBAST tool. The number of models in which each predictor variable significantly contributed to the risk of IFH was quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>From 874 articles, 23 publications reported on 41 eligible prediction models. 32 models reported on model development only, while seven models across three studies included both development and internal validation. Of these, two models were also externally validated and refit to the validation data, but investigated fetuses with antenatally-suspected growth restriction, limiting generalisability. Frequently reported predictor variables included parity (13 studies), cerebroplacental ratio (10 studies) and oxytocin use (6 studies).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No prediction models for IFH applicable to the general population are currently ready for clinical application. External validation of existing models or development of new, reliable models applicable to all pregnant women is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525001216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intrapartum fetal hypoxia (IFH) occurs infrequently and many cases occur unexpectedly, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk fetuses to prevent hypoxic injury during birth.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to evaluate existing prediction models for IFH and ascertain the predictor variables that were incorporated into most models.

Search strategy

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to December 2023 for synonyms of fetal distress, operative birth and neonatal asphyxia, with a filter for prediction models.

Selection criteria

Prediction models for IFH were included. IFH was defined as evidence of hypoxia or operative intervention for suspected fetal distress.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently extracted information on study design, outcome definition and validation. We evaluated study quality using the PROBAST tool. The number of models in which each predictor variable significantly contributed to the risk of IFH was quantified.

Main results

From 874 articles, 23 publications reported on 41 eligible prediction models. 32 models reported on model development only, while seven models across three studies included both development and internal validation. Of these, two models were also externally validated and refit to the validation data, but investigated fetuses with antenatally-suspected growth restriction, limiting generalisability. Frequently reported predictor variables included parity (13 studies), cerebroplacental ratio (10 studies) and oxytocin use (6 studies).

Conclusions

No prediction models for IFH applicable to the general population are currently ready for clinical application. External validation of existing models or development of new, reliable models applicable to all pregnant women is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产时胎儿缺氧的预测模型:系统综述
背景产时胎儿缺氧(IFH)的发生并不常见,而且很多情况是意外发生的,这突出了识别高危胎儿以防止出生时缺氧损伤的重要性。目的本系统综述旨在评价现有的IFH预测模型,并确定纳入大多数模型的预测变量。检索策略我们检索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,从成立到2023年12月,检索胎儿窘迫、手术分娩和新生儿窒息的同义词,并过滤预测模型。筛选标准包括IFH的预测模型。IFH被定义为缺氧或手术干预疑似胎儿窘迫的证据。数据收集和分析两位作者独立提取了研究设计、结果定义和验证方面的信息。我们使用PROBAST工具评估研究质量。量化每个预测变量显著影响IFH风险的模型数量。在874篇文章中,23篇出版物报道了41个合格的预测模型。32个模型只报告了模型开发,而3个研究中的7个模型既包括开发也包括内部验证。其中,两个模型也进行了外部验证,并根据验证数据进行了修改,但研究的是产前怀疑生长受限的胎儿,限制了通用性。经常报道的预测变量包括胎次(13项研究)、脑胎盘比(10项研究)和催产素使用(6项研究)。结论目前尚无适用于一般人群的IFH预测模型可供临床应用。需要对现有模型进行外部验证或开发适用于所有孕妇的新的可靠模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Home-telemonitoring of fetal and maternal condition in complicated pregnancies: Results from a real-world cohort to understand unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions The safety of vaginal delivery following obstetric anal sphincter injury- A retrospective pilot study using transperineal ultrasound algorithm Association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of cardiomyopathy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis Pretreatment decrease of the anti-müllerian hormone level does not translate into the proportionally lower efficiency of ovarian stimulation in patients with haematological malignancies A pre-post prospective study on the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) unit in the management of endometriosis pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1