Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052
Holly J. Giles-Clark , Sasha M. Skinner , May M. Linn , Daniel L. Rolnik , Ben W. Mol
{"title":"Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review","authors":"Holly J. Giles-Clark ,&nbsp;Sasha M. Skinner ,&nbsp;May M. Linn ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Rolnik ,&nbsp;Ben W. Mol","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intrapartum fetal hypoxia (IFH) occurs infrequently and many cases occur unexpectedly, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk fetuses to prevent hypoxic injury during birth.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate existing prediction models for IFH and ascertain the predictor variables that were incorporated into most models.</div></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to December 2023 for synonyms of fetal distress, operative birth and neonatal asphyxia, with a filter for prediction models.</div></div><div><h3>Selection criteria</h3><div>Prediction models for IFH were included. IFH was defined as evidence of hypoxia or operative intervention for suspected fetal distress.</div></div><div><h3>Data collection and analysis</h3><div>Two authors independently extracted information on study design, outcome definition and validation. We evaluated study quality using the PROBAST tool. The number of models in which each predictor variable significantly contributed to the risk of IFH was quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>From 874 articles, 23 publications reported on 41 eligible prediction models. 32 models reported on model development only, while seven models across three studies included both development and internal validation. Of these, two models were also externally validated and refit to the validation data, but investigated fetuses with antenatally-suspected growth restriction, limiting generalisability. Frequently reported predictor variables included parity (13 studies), cerebroplacental ratio (10 studies) and oxytocin use (6 studies).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No prediction models for IFH applicable to the general population are currently ready for clinical application. External validation of existing models or development of new, reliable models applicable to all pregnant women is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525001216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intrapartum fetal hypoxia (IFH) occurs infrequently and many cases occur unexpectedly, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk fetuses to prevent hypoxic injury during birth.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to evaluate existing prediction models for IFH and ascertain the predictor variables that were incorporated into most models.

Search strategy

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to December 2023 for synonyms of fetal distress, operative birth and neonatal asphyxia, with a filter for prediction models.

Selection criteria

Prediction models for IFH were included. IFH was defined as evidence of hypoxia or operative intervention for suspected fetal distress.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently extracted information on study design, outcome definition and validation. We evaluated study quality using the PROBAST tool. The number of models in which each predictor variable significantly contributed to the risk of IFH was quantified.

Main results

From 874 articles, 23 publications reported on 41 eligible prediction models. 32 models reported on model development only, while seven models across three studies included both development and internal validation. Of these, two models were also externally validated and refit to the validation data, but investigated fetuses with antenatally-suspected growth restriction, limiting generalisability. Frequently reported predictor variables included parity (13 studies), cerebroplacental ratio (10 studies) and oxytocin use (6 studies).

Conclusions

No prediction models for IFH applicable to the general population are currently ready for clinical application. External validation of existing models or development of new, reliable models applicable to all pregnant women is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Inside Back Cover - Editors with images Six versus twelve hours of intrauterine balloons placement for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis Voluntary multifetal pregnancy reduction: who should decide and select, and why? A direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ST segment analysis (STAN) and fetal scalp blood sample lactate: A population-based observational study Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage ovarian cancer: A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1