An Explainable AI approach for detecting failures in air pressure systems

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109441
Shawqi Mohammed Farea, Mehmet Emin Mumcuoglu, Mustafa Unel
{"title":"An Explainable AI approach for detecting failures in air pressure systems","authors":"Shawqi Mohammed Farea,&nbsp;Mehmet Emin Mumcuoglu,&nbsp;Mustafa Unel","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Air Pressure System (APS) plays a crucial role in heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs), supplying pressurized air to essential subsystems such as braking and suspension. APS failures normally lead to vehicles being stranded on the road with associated safety and financial risks. Although detecting these failures is essential to prevent such events, the detection trustworthiness is equally important given the high sensitivity of this issue. This paper addresses the problem of APS failure detection using Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a highly intelligible and interpretable glass-box model. A dataset of operational driving data from 110 healthy vehicles, without any APS failures, and 30 faulty vehicles, with detected APS failures, was collected. First, essential preprocessing steps were developed to deal with the hierarchical big data and to extract indicative features. The main objective of EBM is to distinguish faulty vehicles from healthy ones based on those features while providing explanations for its decisions. The model succeeded in detecting most of the faulty vehicles with a small proportion of false alarms (roughly 5%); the overall accuracy was 91.4% and the F1 score was 0.80. In addition, the provided explanations were thoroughly investigated to evaluate the validity and trustworthiness of the model decisions. At the same time, the explanations themselves were assessed based on domain knowledge to prove their efficacy and relevance. When compared with a human expert analysis, these explanations highly align with the experts’ knowledge of the APS problem. The proposed methodology is easily adaptable for other time-series predictive maintenance applications across different fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 109441"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725001827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Air Pressure System (APS) plays a crucial role in heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs), supplying pressurized air to essential subsystems such as braking and suspension. APS failures normally lead to vehicles being stranded on the road with associated safety and financial risks. Although detecting these failures is essential to prevent such events, the detection trustworthiness is equally important given the high sensitivity of this issue. This paper addresses the problem of APS failure detection using Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a highly intelligible and interpretable glass-box model. A dataset of operational driving data from 110 healthy vehicles, without any APS failures, and 30 faulty vehicles, with detected APS failures, was collected. First, essential preprocessing steps were developed to deal with the hierarchical big data and to extract indicative features. The main objective of EBM is to distinguish faulty vehicles from healthy ones based on those features while providing explanations for its decisions. The model succeeded in detecting most of the faulty vehicles with a small proportion of false alarms (roughly 5%); the overall accuracy was 91.4% and the F1 score was 0.80. In addition, the provided explanations were thoroughly investigated to evaluate the validity and trustworthiness of the model decisions. At the same time, the explanations themselves were assessed based on domain knowledge to prove their efficacy and relevance. When compared with a human expert analysis, these explanations highly align with the experts’ knowledge of the APS problem. The proposed methodology is easily adaptable for other time-series predictive maintenance applications across different fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测气压系统故障的可解释人工智能方法
气压系统(APS)在重型车辆(hdv)中起着至关重要的作用,为制动和悬架等关键子系统提供加压空气。APS故障通常会导致车辆滞留在道路上,并带来相关的安全和财务风险。虽然检测这些故障对于防止此类事件至关重要,但鉴于该问题的高度敏感性,检测可信度同样重要。本文采用可解释的增强机(EBM)模型来解决APS故障检测问题,EBM是一个高度可理解和可解释的玻璃盒模型。收集了110辆没有任何APS故障的健康车辆和30辆检测到APS故障的故障车辆的运行驾驶数据集。首先,开发了处理分层大数据和提取指示性特征的基本预处理步骤。EBM的主要目标是根据这些特征区分故障车辆和健康车辆,并为其决策提供解释。该模型成功地检测出大部分故障车辆,并有一小部分误报(约5%);总体准确率为91.4%,F1得分为0.80。此外,提供的解释进行了深入的调查,以评估模型决策的有效性和可信度。同时,基于领域知识对解释本身进行评估,以证明其有效性和相关性。与人类专家的分析相比,这些解释与专家对APS问题的了解高度一致。所提出的方法很容易适用于不同领域的其他时间序列预测性维护应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Retraction notice to “Finite element evaluation of seismic response to RC interventions in historical masonry: Erzurum stone Granaries” [Eng. Fail. Anal. 178 (2025) 109727] Rotating bending fatigue analysis of 3D-printed PLA polymer composites: Effect of short fiber reinforcement and epoxy coating Wheel profile optimization for high-speed locomotives to suppress carbody hunting stability failure under complex wheel-rail conditions Guided wave characteristics and nondestructive testing of corrosion defects in threaded steel resin bolts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1