Efficacy of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer to restore shoulder function in brachial plexus injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108811
Jacob Vincent , Alan Mathew , Renuka Chintapalli
{"title":"Efficacy of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer to restore shoulder function in brachial plexus injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jacob Vincent ,&nbsp;Alan Mathew ,&nbsp;Renuka Chintapalli","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transfer of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to the suprascapular nerve (SSN) is a common surgical intervention employed for restoring shoulder function in both obstetric and traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI). Despite widespread use, there is a paucity of evidence surrounding the efficacy of this procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of the literature in the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Patients had to have a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months. Cohorts containing patients with obstetric brachial plexus injuries were excluded. We extracted data on shoulder abduction strength, measured using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and range of motion (ROM) of shoulder abduction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 298 studies screened, 12 with 311 total participants met our inclusion criteria. The average age of participants was 27.03 ± 3.05 years and the male:female ratio was 25.4:1. All patients underwent surgery following TBPI and average time-to surgery was 5.91 ± 1.52 months. 66.37 % of patients achieved a post-operative MRC grade of shoulder abduction of ≥M3 with a mean MRC score of 2.67 ± 1.02. Average post-operative shoulder abduction ROM was 56.97 degrees. Average follow-up time for all reported outcomes was 24.64 ± 7.47 weeks. Nine studies comprising 243 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which revealed a cumulative weighted effect size of 56.83 degrees (95 % CI = 52.31, 61.34).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that SAN-SSN transfer is an effective intervention for the restoration of shoulder function following TBPI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 108811"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725000940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Transfer of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to the suprascapular nerve (SSN) is a common surgical intervention employed for restoring shoulder function in both obstetric and traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI). Despite widespread use, there is a paucity of evidence surrounding the efficacy of this procedure.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature in the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Patients had to have a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months. Cohorts containing patients with obstetric brachial plexus injuries were excluded. We extracted data on shoulder abduction strength, measured using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and range of motion (ROM) of shoulder abduction.

Results

Of the 298 studies screened, 12 with 311 total participants met our inclusion criteria. The average age of participants was 27.03 ± 3.05 years and the male:female ratio was 25.4:1. All patients underwent surgery following TBPI and average time-to surgery was 5.91 ± 1.52 months. 66.37 % of patients achieved a post-operative MRC grade of shoulder abduction of ≥M3 with a mean MRC score of 2.67 ± 1.02. Average post-operative shoulder abduction ROM was 56.97 degrees. Average follow-up time for all reported outcomes was 24.64 ± 7.47 weeks. Nine studies comprising 243 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which revealed a cumulative weighted effect size of 56.83 degrees (95 % CI = 52.31, 61.34).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that SAN-SSN transfer is an effective intervention for the restoration of shoulder function following TBPI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Neurological manifestations and complications of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: A comprehensive systematic review Augmented reality in cranial surgery: Surgical planning and maximal safety in resection of brain tumors via head-mounted fiber tractography Spinal synovial cyst: A retrospective analysis of 204 cases Bacterial DNA in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Investigating the potential role of periodontal and gut microbiota Nomogram for predicting cemented vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1