Vulnerable Agents and Sustainable Security

P. Chmielewski
{"title":"Vulnerable Agents and Sustainable Security","authors":"P. Chmielewski","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2024.3465376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project explores an ethics for securitization. The ethical program benefits from the multi-dimensional significance of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Engineering practices are critical in this ethical project to assess and shape securitization. The ethics also develops the thought of Hannah Arendt and Elke Schwarz in order to focus on persons: both in terms of their vulnerability and their effective activities to shape a common world. Mark Coeckelbergh underlines the imagination’s socio-temporal role in narrating demands, past and future. Through their narration, vulnerable persons sustain their collective movement forward. Professional risk analysis enables persons to dwell even amid a world of uncertainties. Through skilled habits of design, engineering equips persons to build their enframing world. The plans and achievements of engineers create a syntax of systems that enables, amid plurality, discourse. For vulnerable agents and practicing professionals, their collaborative shaping of a world, not the securing of a nation, finds its ethical guide in the SDGs. The economic, social, and governance dimensions of these goals correspond to the dwelling, designing, and discursive practices of persons and societies. For these activities, the SDGs establish a trans-temporal and global context. Securitization requires ethical direction. The SDGs orient engineering practices so that persons in society through their collective activities are enabled to strive to maintain their common good.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"6 1","pages":"102-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10715735/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project explores an ethics for securitization. The ethical program benefits from the multi-dimensional significance of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Engineering practices are critical in this ethical project to assess and shape securitization. The ethics also develops the thought of Hannah Arendt and Elke Schwarz in order to focus on persons: both in terms of their vulnerability and their effective activities to shape a common world. Mark Coeckelbergh underlines the imagination’s socio-temporal role in narrating demands, past and future. Through their narration, vulnerable persons sustain their collective movement forward. Professional risk analysis enables persons to dwell even amid a world of uncertainties. Through skilled habits of design, engineering equips persons to build their enframing world. The plans and achievements of engineers create a syntax of systems that enables, amid plurality, discourse. For vulnerable agents and practicing professionals, their collaborative shaping of a world, not the securing of a nation, finds its ethical guide in the SDGs. The economic, social, and governance dimensions of these goals correspond to the dwelling, designing, and discursive practices of persons and societies. For these activities, the SDGs establish a trans-temporal and global context. Securitization requires ethical direction. The SDGs orient engineering practices so that persons in society through their collective activities are enabled to strive to maintain their common good.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本项目探讨证券化的伦理。该伦理项目得益于联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)的多维意义。在这一伦理项目中,工程实践对于评估和塑造安全化至关重要。伦理学还发展了汉娜-阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)和埃尔克-施瓦茨(Elke Schwarz)的思想,以关注人:既关注人的脆弱性,也关注人塑造共同世界的有效活动。马克-科克尔伯格(Mark Coeckelbergh)强调了想象力在叙述需求、过去和未来方面的社会时空作用。通过他们的叙述,弱势人群维持着他们的集体前进。专业的风险分析使人们即使在充满不确定性的世界中也能安居乐业。通过熟练的设计习惯,工程学使人们有能力建设自己的框架世界。工程师的计划和成就创造了一种系统语法,使人们能够在多元化中进行讨论。对于弱势群体和执业专业人员来说,他们合作塑造的是一个世界,而不是一个国家,可持续发展目标为他们提供了伦理指导。这些目标的经济、社会和治理层面与个人和社会的居住、设计和话语实践相对应。可持续发展目标为这些活动建立了跨时空的全球背景。安全化需要伦理指导。可持续发展目标为工程实践指明了方向,从而使社会中的人们能够通过其集体活动努力维护其共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Front Cover IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society Publication Information In This Special Issue: Data Breaches in the Cloud—Business Security and Risk Management What Is So Deep About Deepfakes? A Multi-Disciplinary Thematic Analysis of Academic Narratives About Deepfake Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1