Systematic Review of Phase Aberration Correction Algorithms for Transcranial Focused Ultrasound

iRadiology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1002/ird3.112
Mingyu Wang, Zhouyang Xu, Bingbing Cheng
{"title":"Systematic Review of Phase Aberration Correction Algorithms for Transcranial Focused Ultrasound","authors":"Mingyu Wang,&nbsp;Zhouyang Xu,&nbsp;Bingbing Cheng","doi":"10.1002/ird3.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging modality with strong potential for non-invasively treating brain disorders. However, the inhomogeneity and complex structure of the skull induce substantial phase aberrations and pressure attenuation; these can distort and shift the acoustic focus, thus hindering the efficiency of tFUS therapy. To achieve effective treatments, phased array transducers combined with aberration correction algorithms are commonly implemented. The present report aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current methods used for tFUS phase aberration correction. We first searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies on phase aberration correction algorithms, identifying 54 articles for review. Relevant information, including the principles of algorithms and refocusing performances, were then extracted from the selected articles. The phase correction algorithms involved two main steps: acoustic field estimation and transmitted pulse adjustment. Our review identified key benchmarks for evaluating the effectiveness of these algorithms, each of which was used in at least three studies. These benchmarks included pressure and intensity, positioning error, focal region size, peak sidelobe ratio, and computational efficiency. Algorithm performances varied under different benchmarks, thus highlighting the importance of application-specific algorithm selection for achieving optimal tFUS therapy outcomes. The present review provides a thorough overview and comparison of various phase correction algorithms, and may offer valuable guidance to tFUS researchers when selecting appropriate phase correction algorithms for specific applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"3 1","pages":"26-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging modality with strong potential for non-invasively treating brain disorders. However, the inhomogeneity and complex structure of the skull induce substantial phase aberrations and pressure attenuation; these can distort and shift the acoustic focus, thus hindering the efficiency of tFUS therapy. To achieve effective treatments, phased array transducers combined with aberration correction algorithms are commonly implemented. The present report aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current methods used for tFUS phase aberration correction. We first searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies on phase aberration correction algorithms, identifying 54 articles for review. Relevant information, including the principles of algorithms and refocusing performances, were then extracted from the selected articles. The phase correction algorithms involved two main steps: acoustic field estimation and transmitted pulse adjustment. Our review identified key benchmarks for evaluating the effectiveness of these algorithms, each of which was used in at least three studies. These benchmarks included pressure and intensity, positioning error, focal region size, peak sidelobe ratio, and computational efficiency. Algorithm performances varied under different benchmarks, thus highlighting the importance of application-specific algorithm selection for achieving optimal tFUS therapy outcomes. The present review provides a thorough overview and comparison of various phase correction algorithms, and may offer valuable guidance to tFUS researchers when selecting appropriate phase correction algorithms for specific applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information White Matter Hyperintensities: Cerebral Small-Vessel Diseases and White Matter Microstructural Impairments Incidental Finding of Deep Vein Thrombosis on Routine Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging Physician Attitudes About Ultrasound-Guided Procedures Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1