The Impact of Cilostazol in Refractory Vasospastic Angina.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1159/000544943
Richard Z Lin, Rosanna Tavella, Sepehr Shakib, John F Beltrame
{"title":"The Impact of Cilostazol in Refractory Vasospastic Angina.","authors":"Richard Z Lin, Rosanna Tavella, Sepehr Shakib, John F Beltrame","doi":"10.1159/000544943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Refractory vasospastic angina (VSA) includes patients with disabling angina despite maximally tolerated calcium channel blocker and nitrate therapy. Randomised clinical trial evidence confirms the efficacy of cilostazol in refractory VSA, yet its use in real-world clinical practice is limited. This study evaluated the impact of cilostazol therapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with refractory VSA. Methods Between June 2016 and May 2022, 15 consecutive refractory VSA patients were initiated on cilostazol (50mg twice daily), with baseline and 3-month responses assessed via the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The primary outcome was a clinically significant reduction in angina frequency (ie >10-point improvement in SAQ angina frequency score) at 3 months. Results A clinically significant reduction in angina frequency was reported in 13 patients (86%) at 3-months, with 3 (20%) becoming angina free. Moreover, over 3 months, median SAQ scores improved for angina frequency (25 [IQR 15,46] to 75 [30,82]), physical limitation (53 [44,67] to 83 [56,92]), and quality-of-life (17 [4,29] to 50 [35,58]). Additionally, a 54% reduction in angina-related emergency department presentations and 50% reduction in angina-related hospital admissions was noted. Minor medication-related adverse effects were experienced by 3 patients, with no serious adverse effects noted. Cilostazol was continued in 14 patients (93%) beyond the 3-month follow-up period. Conclusions In patients with refractory VSA, cilostazol is well tolerated, improves patient-reported outcomes, reduces healthcare utilisation, and thus is an effective therapy in real-world clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Refractory vasospastic angina (VSA) includes patients with disabling angina despite maximally tolerated calcium channel blocker and nitrate therapy. Randomised clinical trial evidence confirms the efficacy of cilostazol in refractory VSA, yet its use in real-world clinical practice is limited. This study evaluated the impact of cilostazol therapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with refractory VSA. Methods Between June 2016 and May 2022, 15 consecutive refractory VSA patients were initiated on cilostazol (50mg twice daily), with baseline and 3-month responses assessed via the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The primary outcome was a clinically significant reduction in angina frequency (ie >10-point improvement in SAQ angina frequency score) at 3 months. Results A clinically significant reduction in angina frequency was reported in 13 patients (86%) at 3-months, with 3 (20%) becoming angina free. Moreover, over 3 months, median SAQ scores improved for angina frequency (25 [IQR 15,46] to 75 [30,82]), physical limitation (53 [44,67] to 83 [56,92]), and quality-of-life (17 [4,29] to 50 [35,58]). Additionally, a 54% reduction in angina-related emergency department presentations and 50% reduction in angina-related hospital admissions was noted. Minor medication-related adverse effects were experienced by 3 patients, with no serious adverse effects noted. Cilostazol was continued in 14 patients (93%) beyond the 3-month follow-up period. Conclusions In patients with refractory VSA, cilostazol is well tolerated, improves patient-reported outcomes, reduces healthcare utilisation, and thus is an effective therapy in real-world clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Cilostazol in Refractory Vasospastic Angina. The Association of Serum Iron with Congestive Heart Failure: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES 2017-2020. Prognostic impact of coronary calcifications in patients with recently diagnosed prostate cancer. Age-related outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with pure severe aortic regurgitation. Development of a Core Confounder Set for Real-world Essential Hypertension Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1