Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Hypoxemia in Patients After Esophagectomy.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/carj/4691604
Yumei Shen, Yi Xu, Fanglan Xu, Xiaofan Wang, Shanzhou Duan, Yongbing Chen
{"title":"Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Hypoxemia in Patients After Esophagectomy.","authors":"Yumei Shen, Yi Xu, Fanglan Xu, Xiaofan Wang, Shanzhou Duan, Yongbing Chen","doi":"10.1155/carj/4691604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who have undergone esophagectomy are at risk of developing hypoxemia and encountering postoperative complications. It is essential to ascertain whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy offers superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT). <b>Methods:</b> Clinical data from 80 patients who experienced hypoxemia subsequent to radical esophagectomy were retrospectively collected at our institution spanning January 2020 to December 2022. The whole cohort was divided into two groups: the HFNC group and the COT group. Following oxygen administration, we evaluated the variations in arterial blood gas parameters and infection indices within each group, in addition to scrutinizing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. <b>Results:</b> The HFNC group was associated with a better oxygenation index (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub>=41.779, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub>=16.760, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with the COT group. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of C-reactive protein (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub> = 17.603, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and neutrophil count (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub> = 4.395, <i>p</i>=0.039) in the HFNC group compared with the COT group after 3 days of oxygen therapy. Notably, patients treated with HFNC exhibited a markedly reduced risk of developing postoperative complications, especially pneumonia (<i>p</i>=0.039). <b>Conclusion:</b> HFNC outperformed COT in enhancing oxygenation and reducing carbon dioxide levels and infection indices among patients with hypoxemia after radical resection of EC and also lowered the risk of postoperative pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4691604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/carj/4691604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who have undergone esophagectomy are at risk of developing hypoxemia and encountering postoperative complications. It is essential to ascertain whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy offers superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT). Methods: Clinical data from 80 patients who experienced hypoxemia subsequent to radical esophagectomy were retrospectively collected at our institution spanning January 2020 to December 2022. The whole cohort was divided into two groups: the HFNC group and the COT group. Following oxygen administration, we evaluated the variations in arterial blood gas parameters and infection indices within each group, in addition to scrutinizing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Results: The HFNC group was associated with a better oxygenation index (F group=41.779, p < 0.001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (F group=16.760, p < 0.001) compared with the COT group. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of C-reactive protein (F group = 17.603, p < 0.001) and neutrophil count (F group = 4.395, p=0.039) in the HFNC group compared with the COT group after 3 days of oxygen therapy. Notably, patients treated with HFNC exhibited a markedly reduced risk of developing postoperative complications, especially pneumonia (p=0.039). Conclusion: HFNC outperformed COT in enhancing oxygenation and reducing carbon dioxide levels and infection indices among patients with hypoxemia after radical resection of EC and also lowered the risk of postoperative pneumonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Pulmonary Hypertension on Posttransplant Survival of Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis at High Altitude: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anxiety and Depression Among Astana Reinfected Patients at 1-, 3-, and 6-Month Follow-Up in the Post-COVID Center. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Hypoxemia in Patients After Esophagectomy. The Relationship Between Air Pollution, Meteorological Factors, and Eosinophil Counts in Peripheral Blood of Patients With Allergic Rhinitis: A Cross-Sectional Study. RPL39 Was Associated With Sex Differences in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1